BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 09:38 AM
Original message |
GOP talking points hitting LTTE in a paper near you |
|
Who would the terrorists vote for? Wow, how easy is it for that man about town kenny the mehlman to get lemmings to do his footwork for him? Watch for more of this brilliant strategy in the next few weeks, as brave republican chickenhawks sit on their asses and type us a letter saying "we" must fight the terrorists.
|
TheFarseer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Why is the answer so obvious to them? |
|
This implies a type of braindead that disturbs me. If they ever thought about the actual results of the war on terror, they would not be so certain who the terrorists would vote for.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The gop would be swept back into office in record numbers |
|
by the terrorists. Who has been a greater friend to their cause and their success then barbara's shame?
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Naturally the terrorists would vote Republican.... |
|
The republicans have ZERO evidence to substantiate their claim on "protecting us". In fact.. the truth is exactly the opposite of what they say. So far Republicans have been 100% ineffective against terrorism.. and in some cases. such as the Iraq fiasco,,, Republicans are in fact helping terrorists.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. But the gop has been 100% effective in turning out the ignorance vote |
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Even the ignorant are not that stupid |
|
some are even starting to wise up to all the republican cock-ups
|
TheFarseer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. The only evidence they have is |
|
that we haven't been attacked for 5 years. First of all this is not even technically true considering the anthrax attacks. Secondly, after the attack in '93 we weren't hit for 8 years - until the golden boy GW came into office. If they get to count Kobar Towers, the USS Cole and the embassies in Africa - which were on foreign soil, then we get to count the attack in Bali, the attack in London, the Madrid bombing and about 1 billion attacks in Iraq.
I'm sure you already know this, but I had to vent :)
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
We are dealing with the intellectually challenged.
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. lack of evidence isn't evidence of ANYTHING |
|
and republicans have done a whole lot of NOTHING
(except spend OUR money and trample OUR constitution)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |