Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Senate: DeWine's Imaginary Cash Advantage Over Brown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bob Geiger Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 08:43 AM
Original message
Ohio Senate: DeWine's Imaginary Cash Advantage Over Brown
It sometimes seems an unalterable truism in the American political system that, unless a Democrat happens to have been born into an incredibly wealthy family, his or her Republican opponent will always have more cash in the bank with which to wage a scorched-earth smear campaign to victory. Similar to how much better women often have to be in the workplace to keep pace with a less-qualified male, Democratic candidates need to constantly be one better than their GOP foes to run a competitive race.

Unfair to be sure but, in a system bought and paid for by corporate entities and lobbying groups, it's an advantage that Republicans always seem to have.

And even in the wake of news that the national Republican party is bailing on Mike DeWine in the Ohio Senate race -- basically conceding the contest from three weeks out to Democratic Congressman Sherrod Brown -- the GOP and the press continue to regard it as a non-event, based on the whopping cash advantage DeWine is said to enjoy over Brown.

"Mr. DeWine has proved to be a successful fund-raiser on his own, and, with $4.5 million on hand, already enjoys a large financial advantage over his Democratic opponent, Representative Sherrod Brown," said the New York Times story Monday, in which the Republican party is described as moving on to more winnable races in Missouri, Tennessee and Virginia. "He is not dependent on financial support to keep campaigning."



After all, the thinking seems to be, Federal Election Commission (FEC) reports for the period ending September 30 say that DeWine has $4.5 million in the bank, compared to the $1.3 million held by the Brown campaign. Republicans must also reason that no matter what the polls say about Brown being significantly ahead among Ohio voters -- including a stunning CBS/New York Times poll released Tuesday night, showing Brown with a 14-point lead -- a $3.2 million cash advantage will buy a lot of doctored 9/11 video and photoshopped pictures of Brown having tea and couscous with Osama bin Laden.

Well, not so fast. When you look under the hood of the DeWine campaign, it appears that lofty estimates of his bankroll may be quite exaggerated. Indeed, DeWine may be so light in the wallet that he's at most even, or at worst, behind Brown in cash on hand.

Media analysts familiar with the Ohio Senate race have confirmed to me, after a canvas of every television broadcast and cable outlet in the Buckeye State, that two things are true: Sherrod Brown has reserved more than $2.5 million of air time for the final two weeks of the campaign. Likewise, Mike DeWine has booked $3.3 million of broadcast and cable time for the two weeks ending November 6.

The critical difference? The Brown campaign already paid for their time back in the third quarter (July-September), while DeWine has yet to pay a cent for his time -- hence DeWine's contrived cash advantage over Brown.

It's a bit like a coworker and I both coming to work with 20 bucks in our pockets, both destined to spend $10.00 on lunch, but I go at noon and he goes at 1:00 PM. Sure, he'll have more money than me at 12:55 PM, but that's not going to last very long.

Similarly, equalizing these campaign numbers by deleting the $3.3 million that DeWine still needs to pay for his only hope of defeating Brown from his recorded, third-quarter cash on hand, shows that Bush's Republican rubber-stamp suddenly has only $1.2 million in the bank compared to Brown's $1.3 million.

Ouch.

But by not actually purchasing his air time in advance, the DeWine camp has been able to sustain the illusion that they're flush with a lot of money that can be used to sidetrack Brown in the final weeks of the campaign and, at the same time, hide DeWine's lackluster fundraising performance. In other words, that's $3.3 million worth of smoke and mirrors.

In addition, FEC documents reveal that Brown outraised DeWine in the third quarter, pulling in $2.9 million compared to the Republican's $2.7 million.

So what do all these campaign-finance back flips mean? They mean that Senator DeWine is in deep crap financially and in a place that no incumbent wants to be -- way down in the polls and with a checkbook too light to make up the gap. And with the Republican National Committee pulling out and abandoning him to leave office a two-term Senator, it's going to be a long three weeks at DeWine campaign headquarters.

You can read more from Bob at BobGeiger.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dewine has to bet, loan and lose or take it on the chin at the booth
Everyone remembers another famous Ohian whose campaign never did recover from it's presidential campaign debts. Dewine will soon have to make the call, take out loans to try and win the race or fold so as not to be saddled with debt that he may never be able to pay back. His ability to pay loans off will be greatly diminished should he lose Nov.7th. It looks like the RNC and RSCC have both pulled the trigger. Dewine's hyper negative ads have proven to be a bust. The only option left is to cheat by rigging the vote count. Looks like Blackwell has provided a big assist with purging the votes but it looks like the the Democratic party is onto their scheme by pushing absentee voting HARD. The next tactic will be scarce voting machines throughout the state of Ohio. Phase II MUST be that the State Democratic party is methodically reviewing the secretary of State's plan for voting machine distribution throughout OHIO and immediately filing complaints and challenges were blatant shortages exist. There's only 20days left, THIS SHOULD HAVE ALREADY STARTED. IF IT HASN'T I URGE DU ACTIVISTS TO CONTACT OHIO STATE DEMOCRATIC OFFICIALS TO IMMEDIATELY BEGIN EXAMINING THE OHIO SOS VOTING MACHINE PLAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUBYASCREWEDUS Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. You can smell
the desperation in the DeWine camp. He has hired little old ladies to do television commercials attesting to the "honesty" and "integrity" of Mr. DeWine. Today, former beloved Browns Quarterback, Bernie Kosar, was heard doing a commercial also attesting to the character and integrity of Mr. DeWine. That's funny considering that I work for a couple of Republicans who often receive campaign literature and campaign contribution requests. They should only see the smut coming from the DeWine camp and the RSCC. I, too, hope that the Brown and Strickland campaigns as well as the entire Ohio Democratic party is on to Blackwell and his dirty campaign tricks. I know many people who are voting absentee. Let's hope all votes are counted - correctly. Ohio cannot survive another term of DeWine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RonHack Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Need some context here.
I wonder if 100k -200k really makes a difference?

I mean, how much does a political ad, in the various media currently used, worth?

When you spend a couple of million, does being short a few ten thou REALLY matter?

What's your take, Bob?

For me, it does. On the other hand, I'm not running for office, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw DeWeeny on TV last night. He looked very scared.
Looked like Rove had just told him, no can fix the ballots in
Ohio this year. Will look too obvious. Sorry about your luck DeWeeny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC