saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 01:57 PM
Original message |
Has the MSM made ANY mention of the Larry Craig outing? |
|
or does noone care? Was there really a video of him engaging in sex at Union Station? I was trying to listen to Ed Schultz yesterday but I had to leave .I came back to no information! What happened?
|
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I keep seeing vague references to this, but I'll be damned if I |
|
know what the hell happened.
Union Station?
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-19-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. Blogactive.com outed Sen. Larry Craig |
|
Supposedly he has personal accounts from his sex partners. :shrug:
|
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Woo hoo - those f-ing hypocrites deserve all this & more... |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Deserve what? It isn't even being mentioned! |
|
They are treating this as a non story.Now if he were a Dem, all hell would break lose.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. But why is his sex life any of our business? |
|
Gosh, we should just be real christian about him and let him continue doing what we disapprove of. After all he is a republican and a good god fearing christian bush supporter. I mean its not like he's a democrat.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Spokesman Review carried Senator Craigslist denial. |
|
I gather this is the daily paper that serves most of Idaho.
|
David Dunham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. More evidence is needed or Craig could sue the media for libel |
|
There is no solid evidence supporting this charge that has been presented so far. Without such evidence, any media reporting the charge could be sued by Craig for defamation and punitive damages.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. But what about the tape from Union Station? Wouldn't that be solid |
|
evidence? Or was there no tape?I wish I knew what happened on Ed Schultz yesterday! Anyone?
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-19-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. what tape. No tape has been produced. |
|
and Rogers doesn't refer to any tape on his website. Just to "men who say that they have physical relations with the Senator" and to "a man here in Washington DC who says the same" --
Who are these "men" -- don't know, since none are identified or have come forward. And as long as that's the case, this is a non-story.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-18-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Sorry David - they won't be sued. |
|
It is not about evidence - truth is the only defense necessary.
Keeping that in focus - blogActive has never been sued and he has outed several people.
Also, newspapers print gossip all of the time. Often in the past 6 - 8 years the gossip has started on the Drudge Report.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-19-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Without someone to back the story up, it's just a rumor |
|
The alleged sources have chosen to remain anonymous. No way the MSM is going to risk running it.
Was there really a video of him engaging in sex at Union Station?
So far there is just a rumor of a video.
What happened?
Just rumors, and Craig has basically laughed it off.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-19-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
10. as predicted -- not reported (and that's probably a good thing) |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-19-06 01:43 PM by onenote
The mainstream media isn't going to report an unsubstantiated outing. Not. Going. To. Happen. NOr should it.
If there was some substantiation, they might address it and Craig would have to respond. But as it stands, its an unsupported assertion by a liberal blogger -- possibly the easiest thing in the world for Craig to ignore (or if it was reported to dismiss as the unsubstatiated assertion of a liberal blogger).
Frankly, I view it as good news that this hasn't be reported since, without substantiation, its likely to blow up in our faces.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message |