Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Detroit caucus sites ; black leaders call for new elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:03 AM
Original message
Detroit caucus sites <snip>; black leaders call for new elections
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 12:24 AM by Tinoire
Detroit caucus sites stay open extra two hours; black leaders call for new election

By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
The Associated Press
2/7/04 6:11 PM


LANSING, Mich. (AP) -- The leaders of four black statewide groups may challenge the results of Saturday's Democratic caucuses because some caucus sites weren't open or had been moved, Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus Chairman Derek Albert said.

"We feel very strongly that African-Americans were disenfranchised today. ... You had people running from site to site looking for where they could vote. ... We're calling for a new election," he told the Associated Press.

<details snipped>

"This is worse than in the '60s," said Albert, who also is chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus. "This is horrible. This election needs to be stopped. Because this is not right."

<snip>

Dean state director Daren Berringer had said changing polling places at the last minute hurt voters, especially in low-income areas such as Detroit where people might not have arranged transportation to get to a caucus site outside their neighborhood.

"They're walking to their polling place, and they're finding their caucus site has been changed," Berringer said. "The sites in Detroit and Southfield are in minority areas. This is direct voter disenfranchisement."

<snip>

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/news-11/1076181242303271.xml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Black leaders angered by changed caucus sites
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 12:21 AM by Tinoire
Black leaders angered by changed caucus sites

By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
The Associated Press
2/7/2004, 11:09 p.m. ET


<snip>

"We just went through this in Florida in 2000. Michigan should be above this. The Democratic Party should be above this. We're not going to tolerate this."


<snip>

Democratic caucus sites in the city of Detroit were to stay open an extra two hours Saturday, until 6 p.m. EST, to make up for the inconvenience of sites being changed. During the extended hours Saturday, residents could vote at any caucus site in Detroit rather than just the one they previously had been assigned.

But a check of several Detroit sites found them closed after 4 p.m.

<snip>

Howard Dean state director Daren Berringer had said changing polling places at the last minute hurt voters, especially in low-income areas such as Detroit where people might not have arranged transportation to get to a caucus site outside their neighborhood.

<snip>

Lorenzo Morgan said that he and his wife called the Democratic party's toll-free number and were told to vote at one caucus site, only to find it closed. The couple had to drive around to try to find their right caucus site.

"They're afraid even to tell us where to vote," said Morgan, 66, as he came into a caucus site at Bethany Baptist Church in Detroit to vote for candidate Al Sharpton.

<snip>

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/politics-0/1076202545100572.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Democrats disenfranchising Democrats?
I would be banned for what I would like to say about any who would pull that. Especially for what I would like to see done to them.

These are voters we need in November. And we especially need them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm not liking this one bit either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
This needs to be investigated fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edwards4President Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another reason internet voting is a problem
It only makes it significantly easier for those who can afford computers and are proficient in the internet to vote while everyone else (largely minorities and low-income voters) are left to fend for themselves in the face of these kind of obstacles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. agree, it might be possible in the future
but you have to first make sure the current system is fair and equal as can be. any advances should advance all. the digital divide is a big thing and we need to work in closing that gap also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Confusing, wtf was going on up there?
Damn blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. "This is worse than in the '60s,"
said Albert, who also is chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus. "This is horrible. This election needs to be stopped. Because this is not right."

Worse than the 60s, shades of Florida 2000.

If this eats into enough Kerry and Dean votes, people might pay better attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. this isn't good press for the Dems
:( Why were only the minority polling places closed, moved, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. i think minority/poor areas more affected
because michigan had internet voting, so the more affluent areas had more advantage in this area. they can just go home and vote if there is any confusion or even if the weather is bad or other such thing. there is a digital divide still so these type of problems would of course end up hurting those without access as they can't just go home and vote as the more money areas can. this is one reason i don't support internet voting at this point. we need to close the digital divide first, and make the current system as fair as can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontBlameMe Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Nope.
You had to register by Jan 31st to vote online. If people in the more affluent areas didn't register, they would have had to find the new site, too, assuming theirs had changed. They would, however, have better access to transportation than those in low income areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. What!??
How can democrats, after Florida 2000, allow something like this to happen? How can they stand by the results of a caucus where something like this happens?

What does the DNC have to say about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I'll come to Detroit. Oops! I won't.
In literature, that would be called "foreshadowing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Interesting
Who's accountable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC