Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tennessee and the ‘15% Lie’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:41 PM
Original message
Tennessee and the ‘15% Lie’
Today’s Journal looks at the Senate contest in Tennessee: Race has long been a deciding factor in Southern politics, helping determine who is picked to represent the region in Washington. Now, parts of the upper South — including Tennessee, Virginia and North Carolina — are attracting significant numbers of people from other parts of the country who aren’t steeped in the region’s traditions but are drawn to good jobs, lower taxes, top-notch universities and affordable real estate.

The real test will come on Nov. 7. Polls have often shown African-American candidates scoring well in the polls only to fail to clinch the election. In 1990, former Atlanta Mayor Andrew Young drew wide support from white business leaders in his run for Georgia governor but lost in the Democratic primary. The same year, former Charlotte Mayor Harvey Gantt challenged Sen. Jesse Helms — one of the South’s most vocal opponents of racial integration in the 1960s — and was well ahead in the polls but nevertheless lost. Even former Virginia Gov. L. Douglas Wilder, who is the only black elected to a governorship in the U.S., won in 1989 by a much narrower margin — half a percentage point — than the 10% indicated in exit polls.

Some political scientists and strategists refer to it as the “15% lie” — when whites, bowing to societal pressure, tell pollsters they intend to vote for a black candidate but fail to do so in the voting booths. Indeed, several political experts believe that despite Harold Ford Jr.’s strong showing in the polls, some whites may desert him at the last minute.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/10/26/tennessee-and-the-15-lie/

How shameful. I'd never even heard of such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. In the privacy of the voting booth, voters are free to be racist without consequence
The alternative would be to get rid of the secret ballot, but that would cause more problems than it would solve (I oppose that idea).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. What decade is it again?
1930's? 1860's? I'm a little confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've also heard it as the "black tax"
that a black candidate needs a much higher percentage because they'll lose about 5-10% when the voter goes into the booth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, and it's not even a party thing.
Bobby Jindal (an Indian-American) was leading Blanco in Louisiana in just about all the polls.

Bada boom, bada bing. He lost 52-48%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I'm wondering if he will run against Blanco in 2007
Her popularity took a hit from Katrina (and don't expect her signing the abortion ban to help.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Jindal is everything the Republican party claims it is, so
he's going to either run for Governor again or for the Senate at some point.

Then again, if Ray Nagin got to keep his job, maybe Blanco will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder. It's easy enough to make excuses --
They could say "Nah, I find Ford to be fiscally irresponsible" or whatever; if they were really racist they would sooner find an excuse than to make everyone think they were voting for him.

I don't think I buy it -- sounds like another Diebold-type excuse: "Exit polls don't work anymore," "Democrats got too confident so they didn't turn out to vote," "Republicans lie to exit pollers," etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just Keep The Crap Flowing!! Is This True??? Is It Not True??
Is this just ANOTHER "excuse" for how they REALLY won an election they really DIDN'T win??

WILL IT NEVER STOP?? Just read the article by Greg Palast and find myself feeling helpless again! How is ANYONE supposed to get people to vote when each and every election has more lies, more fuzzing and more fraud???

Will my absentees that I turned in for my family really get counted???

I think I'm going to take a few aspirins and lay down for a little while. Better add some rolaids for the acid that is building up in the stomach too! And I won't forget the extra pillow to put over my head just in case I feel like SCREAMING!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. People also lie to pollsters about church attendance and whether they vote...
so yes, it's true. I'm not sure about 15%, but many people tell pollsters that they would vote for a black candidate because they want to be thought of as a good citizen. But then they either don't actually vote or vote for the opposition candidate in the voting booth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. all I've got to say is
GO HAROLD!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. doesnt that seem bassackwards? publicly displaying not just indifference but
anti racism and yet privately racist.

i dont think it smells like reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Try thinking of it this way: When you vote, you're communicating
with an inanimate object that cannot judge you--a piece of paper or a machine.

When you respond to a poll, you're dealing with a human being. If you know what the "socially acceptable" answer is, you're more likely to tell a live human being that answer rather than what you REALLY think. You might believe a telephone interviewer may be an African-American, or you may have picked up more subtle voice inflections that make you think the interviewer very likely doesn't share racist views. In that case, you would have to be a pretty bold bigot to answer questions about race with complete honesty.

Survey researchers are quite familiar with this problem, which they call "social-desirability response bias". See, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not only do I believe it
Unfortunately, I expect this for Ford (and I sincerely hope I'm wrong).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. my guess is they're floating the story they'll use to cover the fact that the
machines here will be rigged.

let's face it, the g.o.p. simply is not going to let a person of color occupy the senate seat that bill frist is leaving. if they have to make bob corker shoot that sumbitch with a pistol on election day, they're not going to let uppity harold ford receive the designation of being the first black senator from the south since reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is a well known phenomena
Dinkins was leading by much more than we won by in his first race and he was leading in his second race against Guiliani. The only race where this apparently wasn't a factor was Obama's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Obama was running against a black opponent
Edited on Thu Oct-26-06 04:58 PM by Ignacio Upton
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if this happens to Ford. However, and this is cynical, but Ford's skin is fairly light (he's biracial) so hopefully the ignorance of some voters can prevent that from happening (honestly, I thought he was white until I found out more of his background.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've seen it happen
It's not 15% in California, but Tom Bradley was leading George Deukmejian in the polls in the 1982 gubernatorial race and lost.

Deukmejian was an abysmal governor who dissed public education and cut its funding at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. "NEVER HEARD OF SUCH" ??? Race-Bias in Poll answers is NOTORIOUS
Edited on Fri Oct-27-06 10:24 AM by Sensitivity
If the "Southern Strategy" and the race-bais in polling is NOT happening
in the Ten contest, then THAT WOULD BE AMAZING.

The real question is whether FORD has been able to transend the usual
race-identity phenomona. It is possible -- because of his light complextion
and verbal polish -- that he has be able to do this.

Professional analysts would not bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. Shameful
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC