itaintoveryet
(147 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 02:54 PM
Original message |
|
of Lamont Vs. Lieberman ? haven't been able to find anything.
|
TheVirginian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
TheVirginian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Most recent poll: Lieb. 49%, Lamont 37%, Schles. 8% (American Research Group 10/20) |
itaintoveryet
(147 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
he could be losing to that traitor - who exactly is voting for him ? are the democrats in CT not supporting Lamont after voting for him in the primary ?
|
TheVirginian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. CT voters are 49% Independent |
|
Lieberman is attracting the majority of Republican support, over half of the Independent support, and maintaining about 40% of the Democratic support.
|
Hav
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
While we are at polls and good sites, does anyone know what happened to www.election-prediction.us ? I couldn't check the site out for several days (I'm not even sure anymore whether I typed the URL correctly). It was a great site with infos to all races and I can't access it anymore.
|
TheVirginian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. The site moved; I'm not sure where to. |
|
www.pollster.com has been very good, though. The site also provides a lot of insight into the art of polling.
|
Hav
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Yes thanks, I checked it out after your first post and it's an excellent site, too. The other site also had information about how much money the candidates still had and comments for the races which I always found interesting.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message |