Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

re: Webb (One hero, not two mutineers...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 12:14 PM
Original message
re: Webb (One hero, not two mutineers...)
Edited on Fri Oct-27-06 12:26 PM by troublemaker
In THE CAINE MUTINY the defendant is upset with his attorney (Jose Ferer) for letting Fred MacMurray's lies about not being involved in the Mutiny go unchallenged. Ferer says, "We want one hero, not two mutineers."

___________

It is not productive to dredge up republican smut in fictional works for three reasons. 1) The MSM is not going to run with this crap unless it is made an issue with two sides, such as a spat about whose books are dirtier. (The equivalency argument provides a media narrative we don't want.) The Foley thing should have brought home the futility of "everyone does it" arguments on hot-button issues. Raising Gerry Studds didn't help the Republicans. Raising Lynne Cheney doesn't help us. 2) Webb's work is not really FICTION insofar as it involves real experiences about real things that happened in the course of his heroic service to his country. The seemingly salacious smear-quote is NON-FICTION... it's reportage of an actual custom that, as Webb said on WTOP, he saw with his own eyes. It is not a sexual fantasy. Lynne Cheney's work is sexual fantasy. Raising Cheney as an repost implies that Webb's work is sexual fantasy, which it is most emphatically not. And 3) Libby and Lynn Cheney are not on a ballot anywhere.

Think about why a real person in Virginia would cast a real vote.

The best outcome is that this moronic attack get nowhere, so it doesn't help to broaden the battlefield into a free-for-all over whose books are smuttier. Democrats always lose "pox on both your houses" arguments. We want one hero, not two pornographers.

If, for some reason, this crap becomes a story then it's not all bad... Just as the Corker ad opened the door for Harold Ford to go on TV and say, "I believe in God," if it gets traction this bogus controversy opens the door for Webb and his proxies to go full bore on his Vietnam record, which is spectacular. (The Navy Cross isn't something you get for just showing up.)

But the best thing is to not create a he-said she-said type narrative at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. UPDATE: Having sampled some of the reaction
Edited on Fri Oct-27-06 01:05 PM by troublemaker
I can say that the democratic response is completely ass-backwards. I just say someone billed as a democratic strategist highlight "fiction" and "Lynne Cheney" in one sentence on Fox while acting hopelessly embarrassed.

This is not complicated, folks.

It is NOT the product of Webb's imagination. It is an ACTUAL NON-FICTIONAL REAL LIFE Cambodian tribal custom he witnessed first-hand and described in a book. It is NOT comparable to Lynne Cheney.

This is like calling the editor of the Encyclopedia Britannica a Nazi because there's a Hitler entry in the encyclopedia.

THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS BANNING HUCK FINN AS RASCIST BECAUSE THE NOVEL HAS THE WORD "NIGGER" IN IT. A description of real life is not advocacy, nor is it fantasy or immagination.

Get it straight, for heaven's sake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC