|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:27 AM Original message |
Any Democrat who trusted this fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. You'll vote for neither, because plenty Dems will see through 'em - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't share........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. I'm afraid I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. have faith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bush had a +90% approval rating just a couple of years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. "Approval" isn't synbonymous with "re-elect." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. yeah but they weren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. Millions of people were against IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Do you think that if every Dem had voted against IWR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. red herring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Let me get Miss Cleo on the phone to find out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I don't need to use your sources such as Miss Cleo to figure this out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:33 AM Response to Reply #14 |
41. This matters not. Kerry and JE voted YES and thus are accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
39. This is a false question....they could have stood against it, and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestMomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. I stood against it in my personal life and was ostracized at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
43. Every dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
46. yoyo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
53. Is opposing Bush enough? Is that their only responsibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. What does our party stand for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Didn't watching Dean teach you anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. What does Dean have to do with it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. If the Dems had voted against * to go to war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
57. The U.N. inspectors were allowed back into Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. No such provisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
19. I didn't hear you castigate Tom Harkin who endorsed Dean. He voted yea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Shhhh. We ain't supposed to know that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. All the Dems that voted for this war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
44. I agree. And no War-Dem will get my vote as long as one who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. non-issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. What is this....Dean-lash? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. The poster wrote: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Whether you like it or not, Dean fired everybody up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
24. General Clark didn't object to the IWR yea vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. but he didn't actually vote for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. touche, Terwilliger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:14 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. You hold John Kerry to every word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Bush's responsibility doesn'tr change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. The point is the media and the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
27. That's as bogus against Kerry and Edwards as when Clark was being accused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:24 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Execute it properly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:41 AM Response to Reply #32 |
48. What guarantee do we have that any elected official will follow the Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Yes, it's an act of faith whenever you empower a President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Bush took an oath to obey the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Clark supporters do keep it in context as far as I can tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I believe that Wes Clark got it right in the NYT reported statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. He did get it right. There is no doubt about it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. For the record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #33 |
45. That's why I said it. Most Clark supporters were consistent about context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:56 AM Response to Reply #33 |
52. Thanks for noticing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
62. I was with the draft Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. What's bogus about people voting behind a buffoon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
58. No. I'm saying BLAMING them for IWR is bogus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
56. Deleted message |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
42. Did Russert mention that the interview was not live? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:25 PM Response to Reply #42 |
59. I said that at the outset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
47. This guy is a JOKE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 12:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
60. a very bad joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
49. I forgot how dumb and deceitful this guy is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
styersc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
51. The government officials who "ceded warmaking power" to Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC