Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Last Scare Tactic (Mary Lyon)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 05:07 PM
Original message
The Last Scare Tactic (Mary Lyon)
Edited on Tue Oct-31-06 06:01 PM by Tace
By Mary Lyon, From The Left -- World News Trust

Question: What’s a scarier boogeyman than Osama bin Laden?

In the waning days of the midterm election campaign, increasingly desperate republi-CONS have found one last nightmare scenario. It’s not Iraq, not terrorism in general, not gays, not Democrats asleep at the switch while that congressional page pedophilia raged away (because naturally THAT one was the Democrats’ fault, too), and not only that we’re all gonna die if Democrats take the House. Nope. None of the above. It’s that old favorite GOP fallback that’s ALWAYS worse than bin Laden: the IRS. “Be afraid! Be VERY afraid! The Democrats are gonna raise yer TAXES!!!”

It’s ironic that the republi-CONS who claim they can keep everybody safer, and insist that tax cuts are the salvation of the Western world, have made us less safe in a large part BECAUSE of tax cuts. The historical trend before George Junior was for taxes to increase with the onslaught of war. After all, that war always had to be paid for, and it was typically a last-resort “extra” as opposed to the standard equipment war has become by now. We were more secure, overall, because we could afford stuff that taxes funded, whether it was guns for the soldiers or butter for the hungry. That was, of course, before the dawn of the Bush II Era, when our much-vaunted “MBA President” and his greedy, cheapskate cronies mismanaged us into a combined international AND fiduciary catastrophe.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m no fan of the tax man. Certainly I’d rather pay less in taxes than more. I’d rather pay less for anything than more. Anybody would. But there are obligations to face when you share an interest in a greater whole (“greater,” supposedly, in every sense of the word) like this nation and its present and future well-being. And as the “Democrats are gonna raise yer taxes!” scary stories are shouted at us from every conservative politician in the realm, that’s the one issue the Democrats have yet to hit back against. They’re finally showing backbone about the war, terrorism and national security, and even the moral issues that have been GOP bread-and-butter matters for ages. They’re fighting back on the “stay the course” flip flop, and against many of the dirtiest campaign commercials in memory. But they haven’t tackled the tax issue yet.

Just once, I’d like to see one of our guys stand up and explain exactly WHY it is that we have those annoying taxes to face, to begin with. Maybe they’re a necessary evil, but the word “necessary” comes before the word “evil” in this cliché for a reason. As Ronald Reagan came to power, fiendish thinkers like Newt Gingrich were already working it. He was the guy behind the “Wisdom of Chairman Newt” -– a nefarious little black book of catch phrases, slogans, and buzzwords to use as cheat-sheets for a kind of political “Mad-Lib” game. There was a list of good and positive words and phrases to be used whenever one spoke of anything conservative, reactionary, or Republican. There was a corresponding list of negatives for use to describe all things liberal, progressive, or Democratic. Taxes, as expected, got lumped into the bad group –- as in the term “tax RELIEF” -– implying that taxes were something you needed RELIEF from, ie: something bad. And because nobody’s ever tried to attack this general strategy head-on, that misrepresentation has been allowed to stand, unassailed, for almost three decades. Americans need some help connecting the dots, because taxes do not exist in a vacuum. Our Dems need to get specific and explain WHAT we pay those taxes FOR:

more

http://www.worldnewstrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=511
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, Tace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lower Taxes And More Services
I think it's possible to frame taxes as something to be minimized in the context of excellent services, such as universal health care and environmental protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The important thing is that people talk about this and come up with
different ways to word it or talk about it than just leave it at the knee-jerk level of "GAK!!! They CAN'T raise my TAXES..." Maybe we can figure out something really worthwhile, and effective here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is not a good day for me to be replying to this. I don't see DEM
Edited on Tue Oct-31-06 07:38 PM by bobbolink
leaders doing much of anything, so I ain't holdin' my breath!

Yanno, sometimes I just wish the people who are *ALWAYS* on the side of poor folk, who *ALWAYS* struggle for the integrity of this nation--The Congressional Black Caucus--would just form their own group, take on these issues strongly, and have a think tank that would come up with the ideas you're wanting, and SHOVE 'EM IN OUR FACES!!

They're the only ones with the collective spines, they're the only ones with heart, and I wish they could just take over and get it done!

See, I told you this wasn't a good day for me to talk about this...

:cry:

Thanks, Mary... ya done it again... and Thanx, Tace, for getting this here!! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Kick for the MOST worthy and esteemed Congressional Black Caucus.
The only consistently visible backbones on the Hill are in that group. Great of you to give them credit. They've been there when everybody else was making excuses, or just plain scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. My Goodness! 128 Views, and nobody sees anything to respond to?
Taxes, schmakses, eh?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Well, don't lose hope!
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 12:18 AM by calimary
At least it's being sampled. Hopefully we can eventually turn the tax argument around. It's not taxes, per se. It's what those taxes help pay for. That connection is scarcely ever made. At least I don't remember seeing much in that regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. one last (sad) kick... I guess the whole tax boogeyman
won't get fought by these dems..

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hey, it's still worth pursuing. Some of these things start slowly.
The tax issue is not as sexy as some of these. That's why it hasn't taken off (not JUST talking about my thread here, either). Sex by itself sells. Controversy sells. But economic stories are tough. Hard to explain, boring, hard to grasp, takes too much time, etc... But you've gotta start somewhere.

Thanks for your kicks, sweetie!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Well, it sure "takes off" with the RW! If Dems don't get it together,
that's still the issue to lose on.

Oh well...

You made a great effort!! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. You hit it exactly right - their tax cuts made this country LESS SAFE and
will likely collapse the military eventually, as well. Then we'll have corporate armies in place to defend the country at "market prices" no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-31-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The only problem with that is - where's the accountability?
Edited on Tue Oct-31-06 10:39 PM by calimary
With corporate entities now enjoying "personhood" status, they can be shielded from all kinds of liability and responsibility for their actions. There should be windfall profits taxes reinstituted on the oil industry, the pharmaceuticals, and the insurance monolith. And obscenely large CEO salaries should be taxed up the yingyang. It's neither fair nor kosher that they should be so lavishly compensated when the little guy at the bottom suffers, gets laid off, or loses pension, benefits, and insurance.

One would think that even a wee bit more moderation would be the order of the day, to head off possible trouble in the future. They could take a lesson from the Romanoffs, for one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. A difficult subject handled with aplomb! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks! And you're so correct - it IS a difficult subject, especially
since the pre-programming has been so effective, and has been allowed to stay in place, unchallenged, for SO DAMNED LONG. It'll take crowbars and dynamite to get people to start thinking differently about this kind of issue. MAN are we swimming upstream on this. But we have to. At least we have to start. It's a subject that just HAS to be broached. Even if we don't get very far with it - and stay stalled for a long time.

Thanks for the kick! The raw material was inspired straight from people HERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. They're so predictable, aren't they?
:hi:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yep. At least they're consistent.
:headbang:

Is it next Tuesday yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I hear ya...
:headbang:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. tax FAIRNESS...
...fiscal RESPONSIBILITY. Somebody has to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes. That's the point. Somebody DOES have to say it.
It needs to be said. It needs to be brought up. It needs to be discussed. And it needs to be faced. Seriously. Someday, maybe, when the REAL adults are back in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC