Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which candidates would govern more to the left than they're campaigning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:53 AM
Original message
Which candidates would govern more to the left than they're campaigning?
Bush campaigned as a moderate and is "governing" as an extreme RWer. Which of the current candidates do you feel would govern more to the left than their current campaigns indicate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. are you kidding??
Every Dem on the pallette will be running to the center once the nomination is sewn up.

None of them would govern more tot the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleetus Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep.
I gotta agree with you. I think moving policy to the right once in power is a lot easier than moving it left. That's because the left is usually about puting people first, while the right is about strengthening current power structures. I'm not convinced a president could move the country very far left even if he did have a "secret" far left agenda as the original poster is suggesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I didn't exactly suggest a "secret" far left agenda...
Just seems like common sense that one would have more freedom after winning an election than during the campaign when needing to grab swing votes. Maybe it's just wishful thinking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. The ability to Govern to the left is entirely
dependent on the mandate from the election. This is EXACTLY why we should NOT be running a Northeastern Liberal Senator who at best will manage a narrow victory, and not help us carry sentate and congressional races in the South.

It is simply amazing to me to watch the Democrats make such a huge miscalculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You think?
I don't know that margin of victory is such an important factor. I would think the D/R makeup of Congress is a much bigger factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. coattails is part of the mandate as I mentioned
The other party does yield to mandates in Presidential elections, if it is clear on what basis the election is won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Huge miscalulation
is an understatement, the Dems are being shortsighted as usual. Dean saying that right now on Wolf Blitzer. The Dem powers that be want a candidate early, this is there goal and they are not budging from that. Wrong Wrong Wrong. They should let the electorate chose the candidate and let the *'s poll numbers continue to fall. My Sunday morning mantra Clark and Dean would turn DC upside down and empty the pockets of the politicians and the Dems don't want this as much as the Repukes don't want to lose the WH. Kerry will have no coattails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Huge miscalulation

Clark and Dean would turn DC upside down and empty the pockets of the politicians

You are seriously over estimating the power of the presidency. You can't "turn DC upside down" without a lot of help from congress, and NO Democrat is going to get any help from a republican controlled congress to do that. And anyone who runs as an "outsider", talking about upsetting the applecart, will get very little help from their own party. I watched that happen to Jimmy Carter. The democratic congress hamstrung him at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Kerry will win with 56% of the vote.
At least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I wish I could believe this
Just saw a poll where over 50% of people polled think that Clark or Edwards should not drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. How meaningful is that?

It's still the primaries, and the poll you're quoting has nothing to do with how Kerry will fare against bush.

And besides, I'm a Kerry supporter, and I don't think either of them should drop out. Certainly not both. We need at least one southerner in the race until the end.

And we've only had 11 primaries so far, and Michigan is the largest one to date (128 delegates). We haven't heard from Ca, NY, Oh, IN, Il, TX etc, etc. And even a Kerry supporter has to admit that anything could happen. Where would the party be, if everyone dropped out now, and Kerry (god forbid) dropped dead next week? (Or stuck his foot in his mouth, and was unable to extract it.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree, blm


And I think the best coattails would be provided by a Kerry/Clark ticket. I think we'd have a realistic chance of retaking the house. I think the Senate is out of reach, given which seats are being contested this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC