Bad news for LIEberman?

[Nightjock]

More than 86,000 new voters may affect close congressional races

snip<
In a state with three close congressional races, more than 86,000 new voters -- more than twice as many Democrats as Republicans -- have registered since May, state officials said Wednesday.>snip

http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/11/01/more_than_80000_new_voters_could_affect_close_congressional_races/?rss_id=Boston+Globe+--+Globe+Northwest


I can't stand the lying sack of excrement. I hope this is good news!

[AzDar]

1. Oh, please let this be good news for Ned...Lieberman is an affront

to the Democratic process and MUST GO.

[Horse with no Name]

2. When it all comes down to it

Nobody ever likes the brat who won't go home at the end of the party.
Good for Connecticut Democrats.

[blm]

3. This is my hope. Conn. can't be stolen like Ohio where there were over 300,000

new voters for 2004.

[Greeby]

5. CT threw out E-voting

If it were easy to steal, then Lieberworm would have done it in the primary. I have my suspicions that certain Shrub-loving "Democrats" are able to call in the election theft system to steal the primary when a progressive challenges them (the races that make me most suspicious being Cuellar v Rodriguez and Edwards v Wynn)

[Totally Committed]

4. A new day, a new hope!

Go, Ned!!!!

TC

[gratuitous]

6. Naw, all those new voters are motivated by one thing

Retaining the status quo. People engage in new and different activities like registering to vote and casting a ballot because they're so happy with the way things are going.

At least, that's the line the GOP was selling about all the new voter activity in Ohio in 2004. Sounds like bullshit to me, but what do I know?

[LSK]

7. is this sarcasm?

:wtf:

[gratuitous]

8. I refer you to the last sentence of my post

"Sounds like bullshit to me, but what do I know?"