MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 12:58 PM
Original message |
Clark next on CNN Late Edition! |
laruemtt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. what a stark comparison |
|
to * this is gonna be............
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
21. The first half was great. Clark is putting *'s feet to the fire on Iraq. |
|
Bring It On, Bring It On, BRING IT ON!
|
Nashyra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Thanks I was looking for my other post |
|
to update. The introduction was actually postive.
|
slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. good! can't wait to see what he has to say! |
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Thanks saywhat... :bounce:
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
laruemtt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 01:06 PM by laruemtt
to that MTP debacle! this should be good
oh he can't - taped. what a gorgeous smile!
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Wolf taped him BEFORE MTP???? |
|
Hmmmm....I wonder why. Maybe so Wes wouldn't be ALLOWED to pound back on Bush's baloney?
|
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Jeebuz...why does Wolf ask the same damn ?'s over and over |
|
does he think he'll get a different answer!!! Wes is in the damn race whether Wolf and CNN like it or not.
|
slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
10. he's doing great so far! |
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. thanks slinkerwink :) |
|
wish they'd let him talk more about domestic issues.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yep, thanks slinkerwink |
|
Dean was very good as well. We need an outsider in the WH!
|
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I cannot understand, under any circumstances, how people could watch Dean and Clark on Blitzer today and then even consider voting for anyone else.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
13. "Bush was looking for a pretext to go to war with Iraq" Clark said. |
|
He accuses Bush of having a "reckless policy".
|
Anwen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Clark is doing great! |
|
And gosh he has a nice smile! :D
|
texasmom
(490 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Clark is doing GREAT! |
|
Fabulous points about the voters he will bring into the party.
Powerful statements about the legitimacy of this war--"since when do we go into a country when we don't like the leader." (paraphrased)
"You don't go to war unless there's NO OTHER alternative."
Jeez...he's such a fabulous American.
|
Leilani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
is this guy good?
No one in the race speaks as well as Clark on issues of national security.
The Repubs will use this issue & pound it. Wes is our best defense against the issue.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
17. We've got a President who doesn't want to be held accountable |
Nashyra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Did they die in vain? |
|
His answer was awesome. * needs to be held accountable.
|
jean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. We've got an administration that is quick to take credit |
|
and unwilling to take responsibility. (paraphrased) Wes Clark is so clear spoken and direct without being strident.
There's more of the interview after the break...
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
18. omg... I am crying.... |
|
Wes is sooooo fucking great. chimpass* is NOWHERE near his league!
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Powerful responses from Clark |
|
He's really nailing the administration. This is his best interview so far. Coming on the heels of shrubs earlier interview, I hope Clark is widely quoted this week.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
27. Clark is the absolute best! |
|
Supreme Allied Commander of NATO just said AWOL took US to war for all the wrong reasons,and SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!
:kick:
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He's crystalizing the feelings of a MAJORITY of Americans on how they're now feeling about Shrub!
Wolf trying to get him to say the 530 soldiers "died in vain." Wes says they didn't die in vain because they were following the orders of the CiC - and that the CiC was wrong!
Excellent! If Wes doesn't get the nomination, he should get Sec of State!
|
Tactical Progressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Clark handles press questions so very well |
|
He just keeps getting better and better at it.
This is one long interview. I thought it would be your typical three minute segment, but they're coming back after the break and it'll be twenty minutes at least.
I really wish the primary and caucus voters would pay more attention to Clark.
|
democracy eh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Now that Wolf has run out of polls to reference |
|
and Clark is answering questions of substance, he is doing fantastic
wow a lot of air time for both Clark and Dean
it is awesome that they are getting the first response to the MTP with the bumbling chimp
"this administration is quick to take credit, but has a hard time taking responsibility"
|
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
26. "90 day" for an investigation...''If our intellilgence is so bad, then |
|
you want to put an investigation on an urgent basis"....(sic)
So logical, so true.
All Patriot, No Act..........NO BULLSHIT
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Amen! That was a perfect answer |
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
33. It was a good answer and something other Dems should say as well |
|
given the threat posed by adversarial governments in the world and the continuing proliferation of terrorism...should we wait 6, 8, 10 months to figure out what's wrong?!?!?
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
30. One answer was particularly good... |
|
"The president doesn't want to be held accountable"
That's very true.
Hey Clark folks! He's running out of time!
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. Thanks Ter, We're not giving up. |
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
35. I don't care if you're giving up or not |
|
I said Clark better hurry, or he won' have a chance, and he won't have much of an impact.
He's good but he'd better get better fast.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
41. As you know, things can change |
|
Clark is a fighter, we'll see after Super Tuesday.
|
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
32. asking about abortion |
|
Who the hell is a fan of abortion? I understand his view, and WES and I are both pro-choice.
|
democracy eh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
38. rights AND responsibilities |
|
I missed part of his answer, but that is how I understand his position
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Wes calls it "not relevant."
Fair answer. Why take the bait?
|
Nashyra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
Very Presidential stay away from the fray. He is not saying no to the VP candidate.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. it was the perfect answer from a candidate..... |
|
stay out of the fray and hopefully the media will expose the dirt on aWol*
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
39. so Clark doesn't think it's relevant? |
|
maybe he could talk about the fact that Republicans would call for the impeachment of any Democrat with the foggy memory and bad paperwork that denotes Bush's lackluster service record.
|
democracy eh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
43. 30 year old issues aren't necessarily relevant |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 02:20 PM by democracy eh
many folks will pass it off as ancient history. Besides, Chimpy has done more than enough bad things in the past 3 years to focus on.
maybe he should have said "there are more relevant issues, than AWOL" doesn't mean its not an issue
It is more than appropriate for the media or others to call Bush out and let the American people draw their own distinctions between the Democratic nominee and that vegetable in the oval office.
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
44. wait a minute...Bush is ALREADY attacking Kerry on 30 year old events |
|
why is everyone trying to distance themselves from the AWOL thing??
Once again...if the parties were reversed, we'd have 24/7 coverage of why the Democrat was a deserter!
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
45. I think its like this |
|
You don't go after it unless you know the answer, kinda like the OJ trial and the Glove.
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
47. BUT! That would make MOST questions off-limits |
|
I mean, Clark doesn't know for certain that NO weapons will be found in Iraq....maybe he shouldn't criticize Bush over it??
No...you know that's a ludicrous option. I feel the same way about this AWOL thing...if Clark has nothing else, he's got general's stars...I think he would be uniquely qualified to criticize someone for having a spotty service record.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
49. Theres a difference between questioning Intelligence |
|
and policy decisions and calling the POTUS AWOL, don't ya think?
|
Leilani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
50. Clark has already taken bullets on this issue |
|
for the Dems; he stood by Michael Moore after deserter comments, & took a pummeling from the press.
At that time Kerry did the Texas Two-Step, & said it was over the top. Wes was left hanging in the wind, so Kerry could look Presidential.
|
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
like, nice try...but I'm not going there with you today, ya freaking idiot.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
I missed it where he posted a ?CNN? poll on whether people thought the AWOL charges were true. Linked anywhere? What were the #'s?
|
texasmom
(490 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Yahoo Headline: Clark Predicts a Win in Virginia or Tennessee |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message |