Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman NYT: As Bechtel Goes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:17 PM
Original message
Krugman NYT: As Bechtel Goes
As Bechtel Goes

By PAUL KRUGMAN
November 3, 2006


Bechtel, the giant engineering company, is leaving Iraq. Its mission
- to rebuild power, water and sewage plants - wasn't
accomplished: Baghdad received less than six hours a day of electricity
last month, and much of Iraq's population lives with untreated sewage
and without clean water. But Bechtel, having received $2.3 billion of
taxpayers' money and having lost the lives of 52 employees, has come
to the end of its last government contract.

As Bechtel goes, so goes the whole reconstruction effort. Whatever our
leaders may say about their determination to stay the course complete
the mission, when it comes to rebuilding Iraq they've already cut and
run. The $21 billion allocated for reconstruction over the last three
years has been spent, much of it on security rather than its intended
purpose, and there's no more money in the pipeline.
The failure of reconstruction in Iraq raises three questions. First,
how much did that failure contribute to the overall failure of the war?
Second, how was it that America, the great can-do nation, in this case
couldn't and didn't? Finally, if we've given up on rebuilding
Iraq, what are our troops dying for?

snip

As for how this could have happened, that's easy: major contractors
believed, correctly, that their political connections insulated them
from accountability. Halliburton and other companies with huge Iraq
contracts were basically in the same position as Donald Rumsfeld: they
were so closely identified with President Bush and, especially, Vice
President Cheney that firing or even disciplining them would have been
seen as an admission of personal failure on the part of top elected
officials.

snip

Back in June, after a photo-op trip to Iraq, Mr. Bush said something I
agree with. "You can measure progress in megawatts of electricity
delivered," he declared. "You can measure progress in terms of oil
sold on the market on behalf of the Iraqi people." But what those
measures actually show is the absence of progress. By any material
measure, Iraqis are worse off than they were under Saddam.

And we're not planning to do anything about it: the U.S.-led
reconstruction effort in Iraq is basically over. I don't know whether
the administration is afraid to ask U.S. voters for more money, or
simply considers the situation hopeless. Either way, the United States
has accepted defeat on reconstruction.

Yet Americans are still fighting and dying in Iraq. For what?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a times select article
Just mentioning this for anyone not registered. Love Krugman. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The whole editorial here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thank you, beltanefauve! Information like this is critical, yet the NYT expects $$$$$.
People desperately need immediate access to information like this, to illuminate what is happening to us, and it absolutely shouldn't be hidden behind a pay firewall.

Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You're welcome
Other sites have tried to post "Times Select" and have been shut down, but Truthout.org seems to be able to prevail consistently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thank you, beltranefauve
And to The New York Times:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Read it here too

Krugman, Dowd, Herbert, Rich

Many of the Times Select columnists are posted here:

http://wealthyfrenchman.blogspot.com/

talking points:

As Bechtel goes, so goes the whole reconstruction effort. Whatever our leaders may say about their determination to stay the course complete the mission, when it comes to rebuilding Iraq they’ve already cut and run.

... the U.S.-led reconstruction effort in Iraq is basically over. I don’t know whether the administration is afraid to ask U.S. voters for more money, or simply considers the situation hopeless. Either way, the United States has accepted defeat on reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. So it is back to Domestic Fraud
Like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.

A friend of mine is still getting screwed on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Iraq= money for Bechtel, Halliburton and other contractors
That's all it was ever about -- oh, yes, and then there was the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, after cutting out 21 billion, they are now running with it n/t
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 02:37 PM by Uncle Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. When it comes to profits, they know they've hit the point of diminishing returns.
It's time for the war profiteers to cut and run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC