Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have BushCo significantly increased port security spending?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:30 AM
Original message
Have BushCo significantly increased port security spending?
Has any money been provided and if so how much, and also in terms of other aspects of security? We have allowed them to shuffle billions of the Treasury into Mil/Indus pockets, so how much has gone into actually attempting to prevent another attack within the United States? Does it even approach realism or is it utterly insufficient?

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Peake/21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. the check bounced n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's actually a good point. The economy is in real trouble if they continue spending
for two more years.

Now about security spending versus transfers to the Mil/Indus complex?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, on the Left Coast,
funding for was REDUCED from Long Beach (huge, major port), Oakland and, iirc, Seattle. DHS has been nothing but a slush fund for Republican district pork. California, as usual, is being "punished."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. John Clancy
wrote a book about a Japanese soldier flying a plane into the Capitol building a few years prior to the 9/11 disaster. He also wrote a book about a nuclear weapon entering the USA through a port & being detonated in Baltimore. If a writer of fiction can see a danger why can't the US government do more to defend the ports. The fact is we are spread to thin. Not enough money to help protect us because we are making our country less safe by being in a stupid war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good Points. And we need to look at it now, instead of bemoaning it when it's too late.
So it's way out of proportion, quite obviously so? There is nothing in Iraq except oil and future terrorists by our hand.

Note that if there is another attack, that BushCo and their base will profit. This appears to be all that they care about, and is all that they do. If it appears obvious now, we need to do something to protect ourselves where the government can't/won't. It's our responsibility to take care of ourselves as best we can. If something happens, we can't blame those who stand to profit for not protecting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. None of the Homeland Security projects have been properly funded.
Port security was one of the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC