Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Maryland Democrats kill VVPB in the Legislature?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:37 PM
Original message
Did Maryland Democrats kill VVPB in the Legislature?
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 12:45 PM by Old and In the Way
Gov. Erlich(R) from Maryland just made that statement on Cafferty's CNN show. Is this true? If so, what didn't he tell us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What?
I have no idea what VVPB is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Voter verified paper ballots.
He said that the Democrats in the state legislature killed the bill. I smell bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. jinx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. huh? Can you elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. .
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 12:57 PM by baldguy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ok....I must be really old, I never heard of this game and I don't get the
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 01:35 PM by Old and In the Way
context for it in this thread.

duh....I just see where the same posts are duplicated. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks
I live in Maryland and I doubt that is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Voter Verified Paper Ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, in the state senate
The House of Delegates passed it, but State Sen. Mike Miller, the Senate leader, killed it. Both House and Senate are controlled by Democrats.

Linda Lamone, the state elections commissioner, is a Democrat and has been the main proponent of Diebold in Maryland. She has also helped promote Diebold to other state election commissioners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks....that's really too bad...I hope Maryland Democrats
reward Mike appropriately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Legislature fought hard for
paper verification, the Senate killed it. Ehrlich originally was very against having a paper trail and threaten to veto any bill that crossed his desk. The Senate was looking at a 20 million dollar and up bill from Diebold to add receipts and Diebold refused to even think about any reduction in price and a veto with not enough votes to over ride it. Linda Lamone(D) has been a strong backer of the machines. Ehrlich tried to fire Lamone and replace her with a hand picked Republican. (Google Ehrlich's practice of firing Dems and replacing them with Republicans everywhere he could.) Lamone went to court to get her job back since Ehrlich did not have the power to fire her the way he did. She won and kept her job. Ehrlich cried, whined and threw a petulant fit, like he does every time he doesn't get his way. The legislature tried to get a verified paper trail for a while longer and though it fell off the pages of the newspapers I know for a fact some have not given up yet. As for Ehrlich the 20 million dollars Diebold wanted was one of his reasons for threatening a veto and he didn't see the need to spend all that money.
But eventually as Ehrlich found out HE wasn't going to have a faithful party member in charge of elections in MD he started pissing and whining that the vote could be stolen and we had no way of verifying it. Course he is in a race with a very popular Dem now for Gov. and he has decided to do the standard Republican thing and rewrite history to claim he was against not having paper verification from the beginning and wanted to fix it. Unfortunately it is working since the papers and news here didn't really cover it very much until this election. Both sides now have lawyers at the ready and we may not know who is Gov. until days before they are sworn in unless there is an overwhelming turnout at the polls.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks CC....excellent comments.
I figured there was more to the story than what this guy was saying. Sounds like a desperate Republican who knows how to exploit an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC