Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC has played the "Harold, CALL ME" ad several times DAILY since the RNC "canceled" it...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:25 PM
Original message
MSNBC has played the "Harold, CALL ME" ad several times DAILY since the RNC "canceled" it...
I have to wonder sometimes how stupid the American public is supposed to be. How can something be "canceled" if it's in "heavy rotation?"

That Harold Ford ad has been on TV EVERY day since its premiere. MSNBC has been running DAILY "Worst of the Attack Ads" features, which...of course...give them the opportunity to run the ad...over and over and over again.

I don't know if Fox and CNN have been pulling similar stunts...I just know that I keep on MSNBC for "background noise," and I've seen / heard the Ford ad several times DAILY for the last week.

I've got to say that a Harold Ford victory tomorrow will CERTAINLY qualify as one of the sweetest in the bunch. The time has come to draw the curtain on the "Karl Rove Legacy."

:patriot:

MSNBC's Shuster made no distinction between true and misleading claims when discussing "five nastiest ads" run during election

http://mediamatters.org/items/200611030012

Republican advertisements

Introducing the first Republican advertisement, Shuster reported that "a corruption investigation has reached associates of Democrat Bob Menendez (NJ)." Shuster then aired an advertisement by Menendez's Republican opponent, Thomas Kean Jr., in which the announcer claimed: "Bob Menendez believes sometimes you just have to break the law ... Is that why ... he wants to give your Social Security money to illegal aliens? Or why he's under federal criminal investigation?" The ad appears to be referring to the Senate immigration bill, which, as Media Matters noted, would do nothing to change the current prohibition on illegal immigrants receiving Social Security benefits. Shuster's report that the investigation has "reached Menendez associates" is vastly different from Kean's claim that Menendez is personally "under federal criminal investigation." As CBS News reported on October 26, "it is unclear whether the allegation is true."

The second Republican advertisement was by challenger Paul R. Nelson, attacking Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) for voting to fund specific NIH grants. Shuster reported that Kind voted to "maintain peer-reviewed research standards at the National Institutes of Health. The standards cover all research." The vote cited in Nelson's advertisement corresponded with an amendment by then-Rep. Pat Toomey (R-PA) to H.R. 2660, which would have forbidden spending on specific NIH grants. Kind voted against the amendment.

However, the advertisement misled on the nature of the studies. The advertisement claimed that "Ron Kind voted to spend your money to study the sex lives of Vietnamese prostitutes." According to the American Psychological Association (APA), that grant was for "the first HIV prevention intervention study targeting Asian commercial sex workers at massage parlors in the U.S." Of another grant, the advertisement said "Ron Kind spent your money on masturbation habits of old men." According to the APA, that grant was for "a new analysis of data originally collected in the late 1980s" to study "sexual function and how it changes with age." The APA noted that "without a better understanding of age-related changes in men's sexual function, physicians may assume that declines in function are normal when they actually reflect early symptoms of diseases such as diabetes and heart disease." Deutsch said of Nelson's advertisement: "My favorite one is the candidate who is paying for masturbation habits of old men and pornograph -- I mean, the way these people connect these dots, it -- it's really sickening. ... I think people are sick of this stuff. And I think consumers are not stupid."

The third Republican advertisement was the Republican National Committee (RNC) advertisement featuring a scantily clad white woman posing as someone who "met" Senate candidate and Rep. Harold Ford Jr. (D-TN) "at the Playboy party," and who invites Ford, an African-American, to "call" her. As Media Matters has documented, the Los Angeles Times reported that "critics said the ad ... plays on fears of interracial relationships to scare some white voters in rural Tennessee"; former Republican senator and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen, on the October 23 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, said the ad made "a very serious appeal to a racist sentiment"; and NAACP Washington Bureau director Hilary O. Shelton also has denounced the advertisement. Shuster misleadingly reported that the advertisement "was so over the line that the Republican National Committee pulled the ad off the air." In fact, according to the Chattanooga Times Free Press, the RNC did not admit it was "over the line"; rather, RNC spokesman Danny Diaz "said the party was replacing the ad as part of a normal 'rotation.' "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. This one is going to get real down and dirty


This is the tip of the iceberg. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait till 08, I'm sick of it allready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC