|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:11 PM Original message |
Bottom line is Kerry went and Bush didn't and it's an uncomfortable fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. Douglas Brinkley is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Douglas Brinkley is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not That Bush "Didn't" - He Had Daddy Pull Strings To Evade The Draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mn9driver (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Watch them spin it. They turned Gore's Vietnam tour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turkw (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. They did, but Gore didn't lead men into combat, Clark and Kerry did, both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enough is Enough (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. Also, Bush scored lowest on tests for getting into Guard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. Didn't hurt Clinton against Bush I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. 2004 Is About Commander-In-Chief Strategy By Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Were we at war back then? No? Didn't think so. Thanks anyway n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Uh...yeah we were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. WRONG. Clinton didn't even announce till Fall 2001. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Yeah? Kerry didn't announce until the summer, but was it any mystery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Wrong. He didn't start RUNNING until Oct.1991. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. The election wasn't until 1992. More than a year after the war was over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Since when do campaigns begin upon announcement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. And by Jan. 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. You're right. Never mind. I was getting my years screwed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Josh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Clinton got into the race in October 1991 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Wrong. Bush1 was a punk ass war criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. The point is, Bush has wrapped himself in the flag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. This was the Bush* statement on MTP this morning that bugged me the most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Sorry, it ain't going to matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. It AIN'T GOIN' AWAY. Whether you like it or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Kerry can run on Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Are you most voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Security issues will matter a lot more in this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
36. the difference: Bush lied/lies; Clinton didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
22. Fair enough. But Kerry is going to have to USE this during the campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. AP - Kerry Questions Bush on Guard Service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
29. Some Of The Military records of George Walker Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
30. No one gives a shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I am someone and I give a shit. Blows that theory out of the water n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Anyone that wants to resurrect Vietnam, will have to deal with war crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 10:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Please notify your local veterans of your opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. 58,000 dead GIs and 3 million dead Vietnamese, all died because of lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. So every vietnam vet would make a good president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. That's not what I said, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
34. Bottom Line- Kerry Voted For IWR And AGAINST Going Into Kuwait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC