Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean was labeled "unelectable" very early on because he opposed the war...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:17 PM
Original message
Dean was labeled "unelectable" very early on because he opposed the war...
and passed civil unions in his state.

Now, a year later, almost every candidate is acting like the war was a mistake (at least the way Bush handled it) and support civil unions.

Why did the unelectable label stick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Bill Maher was right (although I hate to think he was)
and Dean was like John the Baptist. He led the way, but wasn't meant to be The One.

Kerry? I dunno, I have no enthusiasm for Kerry. I'm not sure why he's getting more votes. Maybe because he's tall and seems more "presidential" or seems more experienced or whatever.

My guess is that Dean had a lot of die-hard support early, while a whole bunch of people were still pretty undecided. When the time came to decide, I think people were looking for an alternative to the front-runner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. If you will recall......
The media had written Kerry off about 4 months back and all but had Dean cinching the nomination. That "electablility" buzz word was created just before Iowa. And it was reapeated over and over and over again. You heard "electability" at least 10 times for every 5 minutes of coverage. Wonder why the media didn't tag Dean as "electable" back when they were appoining him before a vote was cast and no one mentiond then that Kerry possesed "electability" as they do now. IMO the public has been duped and the media is swaying as hard as it can. It's so very obvious. I have talked to so many people that are "strategically" voting. Trying to anticipate how the rest of the country will vote instead of voting their preference. And no, I am not pushing a Dean should be winning theme. The same "sway" or influence of the media has had it's toll on the other candidates as well. Clark barely gets any press time, Kucinich surely doesn't Sharpton gets zero and Edwards get's little. It's completely shameless. And if any of them are lucky enough to get a second of press time it generally is spent defending themselves against the media attack dogs instead of talking about policies or issues. A classic exaple of what this country has become. Most have decided that instead of doing the research and making up your own mind it is far easier to let the media do your thinking for you. That is a sad sad state of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rationality Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ratings, Ratings, and the DLC obligarchy
Dean held the lead until a few days before Iowa, so the DLC and the news networks had to keep trumping it up until they got something interesting, like Dean's complete 180 in his popularity.

But that's just my theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was (a)before his time, (b)too negative, (c)undisciplined as candidate
Dean really could have locked the nomination down by February 3rd. He had it not quite in the bag, but somewhere very close to the bag. He didn't fall apart because he was targeted but because politically speaking he couldn't take a punch. Better to find out in January than October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, Dean Took a LOT of Hits Before Iowa
So many that I was starting to become convinced he had the kind of teflon that could get him elected. Eventually, they just accumulated.

He WAS targeted and needed perfect tactics and image management to respond effectively. He was not successful. And he didn't see the dangers from his rising negatives.

Dean can still win, but it will take a scandal or effective political hit on Kerry in the next couple of weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Interesting thought, Ribo, my only thought is that he imploded so fast
that it smaks of something suspicious. I've never seen a candidate start out the gate like he did and implode this fast. That's what make me feel.....something isn't correct about all this...

No, sour grapes (the DU meme) just thinking that having been through quite a few elections that this just has a taint of some kind. :shrug;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'll take B and C
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 11:42 PM by eileen_d
Don't know about A. I don't know when Dean's "time" is or will be.

If I ever considered Dean "unelectable" it sure wasn't because of his opposition to the war. It was because of his personality and style. He's a real "love-him-or-hate-him" type IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. what punch are you referring to?
I saw him take punches constantly as the media discovered him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. You're rewriting history, it was when Dean started lying constantly
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 11:39 PM by Bombtrack
and people started realizing that somebody who wants to raise taxes on the middle class and retract a statement every 2 days is not the smartest choice

He also came from among the if not the worst states a democratic candidate could come from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I've been paying attention to the race for a year
And that is exactly why Dean was labelled unelectable back then.

I was screaming my damn fool head off to anyone who would listen that Iraq was a HUGE mistake, but the pundits spoketh: "Iraq war is AWESOME! Dean is unelectable!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Thinking that somebody ever actually said "Iraq war is awesome" shows how
warped your perception about Dean has become, how badly you've baught into his campaigns propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Whatever
Before the Iraq war everyone was crowing about how anyone who opposed it was a peacenik traitor, or worse. Dean was one of them and spoke for me when other candidates held their tongues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I second that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. No.....I never heard Dean tell me or the public a "lie." I think you're
wrong on that, and don't know why you think anyone would find that believable..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. He lies about everything
his whole campaign was based on the lie that he is the only "real" democrat in the race. And he lies about things here and there like him coming up with the trent lott joke that James Carville told him in "K street" and saying Jimmy Carter invited him to Georgia, when his campaign asked to come. The latter 2 show it's a pathological thing and because anybody with any self control would have known that he would be found out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Taxes
If anyone thinks that we will be able to get this country out of the mess it's in and keep these so called tax cuts they are dreaming. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A measly tax cut, which by the way was not a tax cut at all for most average people. I got one of those piddly 400.00 checks. guess what, I had to add it as income this year, my child tax credit was NOT 1000.00 it was 600.00 (deduct the piddly 400.00) and wa la, I owe the IRS money. I got a 400.00 government loan and now I have to pay it back with interest. That ought to boost the economy. Put the taxes back where they were and keep my grandmothers and my parents social security. I for one am more than willing to pay a little more in tax than to see my grandmother and parents cut off after working their entire lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. the only "lies"
came from sound bites intentionally twisted by the press to imply something other than what he was really saying. That he needed to clarify what he said so much was ample evidence of targeted media bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. because of other actions
such as wasting all his money, his lack of control on his temper (though I disagree with that one), negative attacks and the fact that he was the frontrunner for so long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. yeeeeeeargh!
Dean is still going strong in many primaries, getting over 20% of the vote. If Dean would have acted like he did after New Hampshire in Iowa instead of the red-faced vein-popping stuff, it seems plausible he may have recovered and won states like Michigan and Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. red faced vein popping stuff?
Is there anyone here can that can explain to me about the red face vein poping actions? I am assuming the Iowa speech is what is being referred to. Did anyone see it other than on television?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nankerphelge Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Negative press stories repeated ad nauseum
The same thing that happened to Gore in 2000; the Dean "angry" scream is the equivalent to the Gore "I invented the internet" story. Both were media creations that were used in lieu of real reporting on real issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rationality Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. CORRECTUMUNDO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tobius Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. "Media creations"
- has a nice ring to it. Unfortunately, if you go back to that night and the next day on this forum; and many other forums that are more Dean centric, you will see the palpable fear and interest the "yell" evoked. That evening was Deans national intro to many people across America that had never seen him speak before. All they had heard was he was the front runner who had questions about his temperament. That performance solidified it and the incredible "around the watercooler" interest was reflected in the network,cable and internet news that followed. Even die hard supporters put together websites dedicated to musical re-mixes of the yell. Hell, Dean even went on Letterman,- I guess as part of this grand conspiracy.

"Men readily believe what they want to believe."
       -- Julius Caesar, Commentaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. A couple of other observations:
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 11:55 PM by fabius
Media had it in for Dean because he said he would "break up media monopolies". Needs to be done, he spoke the truth, it made him a target.

The Media and IWR supporters had it in for Dean because he said he said capturing Saddam didn't make the country safer. He spoke the truth, it made him a target.

Gephardt, Kerry and Edwards had it in for Dean obviously because they had to beat him or at least cut his lead down. It worked.

The big Dean campaign mistake IMHO was the apparent lack of a "Plan B" for the campaign. Everything was staked on Iowa and NH, when it didn't pan out there appears to be no solid fallback plan. A stronger push in WA earlier could have narrowed Kerry's lead, or even gotten a win. We had tons of Dean volunteers from Oregon to "electioneer" outside the caucuses (in Vancouver WA) but we couldn't do anything once the caucus started. There were no arrangements to give people rides to the caucuses, etc.

Another thing I got from some statistics appears to be Dean has not successfully connected to minority voters in the contests so far. This is a matter of message and personal style, I guess, and would have to be corrected to win the GE. Also I think the Kerry military background helps with certain audiences. We talked to an older man in WA, a vet. and he said, "Kerry will bring our troops home".

One thing Dean lacks in a "modern political marketing" sense is a personal story line. He basically made a mistake to not reveal himself to the voters. Kerry has a story (war hero) Edwards (Daddy worked in a mill), Clark (general turned politician, Republican turned Democrat), all these have appeal and build trust. Bush even has a story - all phony but some believe it. Howard Dean needed to build a story around himself. Seems dopey but that seems to be how it works.

As far as Deaniacs locally here in Portland OR, we're committed to a long-term movement of some kind, or liberal wing of the Democratic Party as suggested by Will Pitt. We're not giving up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'll kick to that post, brother
I think you're 100% right on the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Dean was attacked because he was the front runner
Don't try to romanticize his downfall by saying he went down for an idealistic cause which the stupider-than-me gaggle of Americans simply weren't good enough for.

Remember that Dean rode a wave of a great deal of free press which garnered him 3 magazine covers while Kerry was struggling just to get on the radar. "Aloof" and "wooden" were thrown around like "angry" was for Dean. I can recall more than one time when TV interviewers tried to make Kerry look like a high lunatic on the IWR issue. I remember when WP ran a story about how aloof Kerry was because he ordered a Philly cheesesteak with Swiss.

As far as Deaniacs locally here in Portland OR, we're committed to a long-term movement of some kind, or liberal wing of the Democratic Party as suggested by Will Pitt.

It would relieve you to know that Kerry is to the left of Dean. So yay for liberalism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. still dont know why DK is thought to be unelectable he has positions
which liberals and conservatives like ex anti patriot act anti free trade (no one likes their job taken to india)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
27. Dean was typecast like one of the Brady Bunch kids
Using the anti-war candidate theme worked for a while, but then that is all he was known as. Dean had many other good ideas unrelated to the war, but no one could see past the anti-war message which consisted of "I was right and you were all wrong". He appeared to be a one trick pony to many people. Thats what happened.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. This is right on
"I was right and you were all wrong" - perfect characterization of Dean's anti-war position, if not his whole candidacy.

What amuses me is that some people don't understand why Dean's self-righteousness is not attractive. It turned me off immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC