Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"How the Dems Won"...an eye-opening op ed. Nice one.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:26 AM
Original message
"How the Dems Won"...an eye-opening op ed. Nice one.
I knew some of these things, like the radio ads on religious stations, but I did not realize how Steve coordinated some of the committees with the DNC.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/zito/s_480368.html

Democrats knew they needed to get their ducks in a row and at least have a decent showing for the 2006 midterm election. The entire House, one-third of the Senate and a score of governors' seats were up for grabs, and they were staring at a U.S. map that was a sea of red.

First order of business was to place aggressive leaders at the top of their party infrastructure: Howard Dean at the Democratic National Committee, Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and New York Sen. Chuck Schumer at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Emanuel and Schumer both had one job: to get people elected on Nov. 7.

Dean's job had a different timeline and different intensity; it was and still is -- unless James Carville gets his way -- to build the party and to make it competitive again. He has to do as many things as possible, as quickly as possible, yet do it over the long term. This means investing in infrastructure -- investing in things that pay dividends for the party, not just in 2006 but beyond.


The rest is interesting, but this part especially.

Democrat strategist Steve McMahon, of McMahon Squire Associates, worked with both the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the midterm cycle. Among other things, McMahon was responsible for the national committee's "values messaging" in the reddest of red states. The strategy was to go after the hearts and minds of rural Christian voters through radio -- and it worked. There was no screaming, no partisan attacks; the tone was neither shrill nor harsh. Rather than use traditional political advertising, McMahon's operatives wrote short radio ads, read by a local voice that people hear every day, that were embedded into a radio station's weather, sports, news and farm reports.

In nine red states including Virginia, Ohio and Indiana, some 5,000 of those ads reached an audience of 9 million to 12 million people, all of whom were hit at least three times. That's a lot of voter contact. And Democrats bought out the entire advertisement inventory, so Republicans could not copy them if the GOP got a scent of what was happening.

"These were not overly partisan messages," McMahon says. "They were not shrieking negative ads. They were simple messages that began with 'Are you tired of ...' or 'Think about this ... .' "


She goes on to say that you would think Dean would get some credit for all the work, but that was not the case. It was a collective effort, yet only Schumer so far has menioned his name.

She then goes into calling the Carville attacks just about what they are, and she may be right...we have seen no response from those she mentions.

This is a new DNC, working in a different way. Dean refused to pay for TV attack ads for Rahm and Chuck, and they were working on the ground with other kinds of ads.

What Carville did this week was painful. It was totally unfair. Maybe it happened for the best, we will see. Read the op ed...interesting.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee... How Could They Overcome Dean's Failure (of Rumsfeldian Proportions)?
(Sarcasm, of course)

Deans's DNC did a great job. Heck, they won!

The Carville/Clinton crowd ran the DNC for 12 years and lost every election. An actual Dem took over, and we won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Read the end of the op ed. She refers to who is behind Carville.
Also notice the Dems used the strategy of buying up the ad time on the radio. Cheaper, just talking to them, but effective.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Of Course It's Hill The Shill
Even Rahm's distanced himself from Carville's vile spew - but Mrs. Clinton's silence is deafening.

This garbage will be incessant for the next year or so - the Clinton's have never been known for their subtlety, and they're well funded by their patrons in the Predator Class. I only hope that actual Dems can hold fast against their crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Defend whoever they attack
That's the key. That's what I believed it was important to defend Murtha. I'm convinced that attack came from the Clintons because they also didn't want a strong anti-war voice leading the House Dems. I also don't think it's any accident she called Kerry's joke "inappropriate", any opportunity to kick the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I did not like what she said about Kerry.
I don't think that either of them have weighed in on Carville, except to say (and I can't find the source) that he did not "clear" it with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Hilary continues to
alienate me with what I perceive to be an ingratiation with Corporism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Of course it is
I wanted to buy up cheap classified ads with a simple - "You Might Be A Democrat If - you believe health care is a right." And similar messages. Simple and cheap, and constantly reminding people of who Democrats really are. That's the constant drumming of the message we need in the reddest of the red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Excellent Idea!!!!
I live in a now Southern red state, & this idea is wonderful -- to creep some doubt into the Red voter mind. They live in doubt anyway, why not capitalize on it! Foxworthy rules here! Those of us in the South in particular can use this as a chipping-away strategy for 08.
I intend to begin this week! Thanks, Sandnsea!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. RIGHT ON!!
that is exactly what we need...over and over and over...not attacking anyone...just quietly making the point...brilliant idea!!
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. I love it when reason works!
about damn time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I thought of an similar campaign on a grander scale, but I LIKE this!
Great grassroots campaigning and we can afford to do it individually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like McMahon's a very smart individual.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Tom, his brother, was head of DFA, then moved to DNC.
I like Tom better, really. Steve's a strategist, Dean trusts him, a lot of bloggers have mixed feelings. But credit where due. Tom is exec director of the DNC now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unlike the repukes, the Dems were on in droves baby!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. A lot of us
would be very unhappy to see Dean get shut out by Carville. Dean has been extremely capable, and deserves a lot of the credit for us winning both Houses. Dean should stay, but Carville can go, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I agree, but unfortunately Carville, is a media "darling" and will always be
an invited guest. What Dean needs to start doing is to start showing up where Carville is and start demanding to be heard as well..

Or he needs to "withold" dems from these shows. he might have enough sway with the Non-Carville-ites to get them to go along.. A few months of boring guests with nothing to say but the same ole thing, might just convince a few people.

I was glad to see him spread the word about REAL values.

The phony values that republicans have had a monopoly on are just that ...PHONY.

Real values don;t need to be religious..they span all religions..

Repibllican "values" always mean that somebody's gonna get screwed..

poor people
black people
school kids
gay people
women
immigrants

They are the party of divisive, hateful people, but probably those people actually think they are righteous people, so they just need a "values transfusion"..of different values..

dean did a great job.. I just hpe people let him continue the task.. It takes a LONG time


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. We can also go on the offense against Carville. We need to call those shows WHEN HE'S ON THEM.
The only point we need to make is this: "What did James Carville do to get the Democratic majority in both houses?"

That's it. It will embarrass him terribly bbecause for once he won't have a thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. We need more charismatic pundits who the talk shows will put on instead of Carville.
They put him on in part because he's knowledgeabel, in part because he's colorful. We need others like him but more authentically Dem who will compete with him for airtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. What's really interesting about this article is that the Pittsburgh Tribune Review
is Scaife's rag. He basically funded the impeachment process against Bill Clinton.

What The Trib had to say about Howard Dean is very nice, correct, and well-deserved. It's wonderful that they actually had something good to say about Democrats, which is a rarity with that paper.

Scaife sure doesn't like the Clintons, does he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Well, since people now post NewsMax and Washington Times here..
as well as World Net Daily, and many others...and they do with regularity...I figure it is good that there is something nice there.

I remember when those media were not allowed to be posted here as sources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. hey neen!
yeah, the Trib has been strangely "fair and balanced" lately! :rofl:

that's so funny. I can't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Her Bottom Line judgement:
"But remember: When Carville and the Clintons rolled into Washington in 1992, Democrats had the majority; two years later, under Clinton leadership, their majority was swept under the bus."

The Clinton/Carville gang seems to believe that winning elections is the result of splitting the difference between reasonable positions and crazy ones. The result is, IMO, half crazy, and results in no clear distinction between the parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. typical leftwing spin there
Remember, when Carville and the Clintons rolled into Washington, third party candidate had just gotten close to 20% of the vote. Public opinion of the entrenched power in Washington had been on the decline for two decades. It was the 30+ year entrenched power that caused the worm to turn - not 22 months of Clinton governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. another eye opening op-ed by the same author
Political debate inside the Beltway has kept the average American unaware of the progress in Iraq. And time has dulled our recollection of our own struggle toward a democratic republic... Yet politics has buried the successes in Iraq. John Kerry is the perfect example of a verbal bomb-thrower. We expect the inane from Howard Dean, but Kerry should just plain know better.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_402532.html

Interesting the OP would believe this author, who is pushing the rightwing spin that the media just isn't reporting the good things about the Iraq war, who called John Kerry a verbal bomb-thrower (a Bill O'Reilly line) and Howard Dean "inane."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Amazing...you research every post of mine, trace the writer's other posts..
She and Kathleen Parker...both giving credit. I say good for them.

It is amazing to me that everything I post, you must go back and do a history.

Yet one day you chided me for posting a writer that you quoted on your own blog.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. LOL! No, I'm familiar with this writer. But just so everyone knows your honesty...
Show us further examples of what you claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Subtle, yet simple and compelling, to any Republican with a grain
of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. recommended for greatest
this strategy is what we have needed, and failed to do, over the last several election cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC