|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 12:57 PM Original message |
Lawrence O' Donnell Pissed - Pundits All "Combat Cowards" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Kewel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bill Clinton should not be included on t hat list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. A lot of people opposed the war and still ended up in Vietnam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Wrong on both counts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. But Hillary voted "yes" instead of "no"- despite her speeches. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Motivation matters.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. And and she was motivated to vote "yes" instead of "no." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. A reasonable position to take at the time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. At the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. You are wrong IMO... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Wrong- Bush was a known liar at the time- and his Iraq info was known to be lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. So again...your position then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. No-my position is that they should have voted "no" instead of "yes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. So... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Perhaps many hoped that thousands of people would not die? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. So...Clinton, Kerry, Edwards et al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Wrong- the resonable and fact-based postition would have been to vote "no" instead of "yes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I'm not talking about blogs- I'm talking about the debunking of Powell's lies to the UN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Cite your sources....conclude your argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. LOL! You need links that Powell's speech was proven to be lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Of course we now know they were lies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Wrong- we knew Powell was lying & using forged docs before the invasion. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Again...please cite contemporary sources... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Is your position then.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. My position is that she voted "yes" when she should have voted "no." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Why won't you acknowlede the logical conclusion of your argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. I adressed YOUR conclusions in post #34. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. On Hillary Bull - If she ends up with the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. She has an excuse- she trusted known liars-Bush/media instead of anti-war DEMS with the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Your position is tenable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Bill too did what was politically expedient back in his day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. That is not my argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Good point. It's a whole other thing to be a pro-war draft dodger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. Many Vietnam protesters answered their draft calls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. He didn't do it, but was crucial, PUBLIC support for Bush on HIS pre-emptive war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Excellent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Agreed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
32. O'Donnell was awesome on Scarborough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. They were in shock at first! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
37. Opposing war is easier when you're not one of the people needing defening, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC