Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats like Iraq commission's report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 08:51 PM
Original message
Democrats like Iraq commission's report

Democrats like Iraq commission's report

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 44 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Democrats in Congress, encouraged that a special commission will recommend a major reduction of U.S. troops in Iraq, say its report next week will serve as a jumping-off point for pressing their case that a withdrawal should begin in 2007.

Plans beyond that are elusive among members of the majority-in-waiting. Democrats are divided among themselves — and with President Bush — about how many troops to withdraw, when, and where to reassign them.

Snip...

"Sounds to me like they're going in the right direction," Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn., said of the commission.

Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., said he was encouraged by the sense that the group would recommend a troop redeployment.

Snip...

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said, "I hope that in the coming weeks the White House will engage in good-faith discussions about how to proceed that will seriously consider the ideas put forward by the study group, as well as other proposals."

Snip...

Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, who has argued that Iraq should be split into republics, will become chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee in January. He said he was concerned that the report "may miss the most important point," a political agreement about the structure of Iraq's government.

Snip...

Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., said he was troubled by reports that the group would not recommend a timeline for redeploying U.S. troops. "Not including a flexible timetable ... would be a mistake that weakens both our efforts to help Iraqis reach a political solution in Iraq and our national security," he said.

more...


Nothing has changed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pig meets lipstick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just curious: what would you have liked them to say?
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 09:03 PM by jgraz
ETA: To me it sounds like they're being diplomatic while not letting go of their presumed push for withdrawal/redeployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know the headline states that, but
are all the Democrats quoted pleased with the report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Ahhh -- little slow on the uptake
You should send that to FAIR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is VERY helpful..
My biggest concern was the Bush would be able to maintain the status-quo position, resist calls for withdrawal, and maintain the troops there UNTIL the Democrats cut funding (ala Vietnam). Then when Iraq dissolved into sectarian violence and warlordism the repukes could blame the democrats for the humanitarian suffering and for 'abandoning Iraq'.

This 'non-partisan' commission gives us some leverage to push for an end to the madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is the Iraq Study Group for/against Junior?
I'm wondering which scenario is more accurate:

A. Bush Sr gets tired of his son's failures. He tells Junior that daddy's heavyweight friends
are forming a group that will release a plan for staggered withdrawal. Daddy tells Junior
that he has no choice but to go along--or else the group--and its elite military and political
members will shine the spotlight of failure on Junior and his war.

-or-

B.) The Iraq War Group was formed to control dissent of the war and stop Junior's polls
from eroding into single digits. Daddy didn't like people bad-mouthing his
son, so he galvanized his friends and is using their political and military clout. The Iraqi
War Group members are knowledgeable and prestigious on all matters political and military.
They'll back Junior's policies, in order to make Junior look like less of an abysmal failure.
It's a big crutch--comprised of Daddy's friends--that will keep Junior propped up and backed
up by well-known, affluent movers and shakers.

Is the Iraqi Group more A or B?...Or possibly some other option (C?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The report is due next week, but he's already rejected them. My guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. C) Baker and HW....
have formulated a plan to maximize Carlyle Group and Royal Saudi profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC