Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody else seen this batshit crazy Republican email?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:16 PM
Original message
Anybody else seen this batshit crazy Republican email?
Received from two right wing friends:

Published: October 22, 2006

Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer. First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class."
She went on to say, "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq, our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time highs. What this really means is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans just to put money in their own pockets."

When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded, "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs. There is no question these windfall profits and income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class. Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich. We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income to flow to the rich."

When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401K's and the stock market she replied, "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more 'trickle down' economics claiming that, if a corporation is successful, that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous. How much of this 'trickle down' ever get to the unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs."

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower Federal Income Tax taxpayers off the roles and increase government income substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent she replied, "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'."

A Bush spokesperson responded to this interview by saying, "Mrs. Pelosi has set a new standard for the spin business."

====================

They're at it already and we aren't even in office yet . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reply all and demand they provide links to the quotes.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly - those all sound made up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Did better than that. Researched the whole thing and pretty much
took it apart--only interview Pelosi gave on Oct 22 was with 60 minutes and nothing in the email was in that interview. Could not find a single reference to any of the "quotes" on any of the Internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Next time don't do their work for them. Make them do it...
...and then when they come up short, they either have to admit to their email list that they have no proof - or they have to shut up.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Only problem with that is that they don't so any homework.
They blindly drink the cool aid and pass this stuff around.

I explain to them that they put their name on this shamelessly stupid stuff and anybody who reads the forwarded email assumes they are shameless and stupid themselves.

They won't do any work, they blindly assume that if it came in an email and it fits their world picture it MUST be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good. Get 'em on record making that point. Remember...
Edited on Mon Dec-04-06 02:47 PM by ClassWarrior
...you'll probably never convice them. It's the other people who are receiving this crap from them who you want to convince.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually getting back to 60% on the top would be a good idea
along with taking the bottom 30% straight off. That plus indexing the whole mess to inflation so they can't just do another stealth tax on the middle class like they did with the AMT.

Not of course that Pelosi has proposed any such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Way too many red flags in that one.
"When questioned about recent stock market highs..." by WHOM?

Bad capitalization, punctuation, etc. Classic hallmarks of freeper e-mail fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. .
That sounds to be made up, designed to be a Repubs nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Remember the Repub talking point that Clinton had stimulated the economy
too much, so it had to crash?

Friggin' morans can't even keep their ideology consistent, much less get it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. amazing that republicans feel obligated to make up crap
comma, to lie, cheat and steal because if you're a republican the means always justifies their righteous ends.

Maybe just a teensy bit ironic too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heidiho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sore Losermen!
That's what I keep saying when anyone says those kinds of things to me - they don't like their own medicine - I guess it tastes bitter to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is false and has been debunked by snopes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Snopes didn't have it when I got my first copy. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. REPLY TO ALL WITH THE SNOPES LINK
Edited on Mon Dec-04-06 10:36 PM by Skittles
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp

ASK THEM WHY THEY ARE SO READY TO BELIEVE WHAT COULD BE EASILY DISPROVED WITH 10 SECONDS' RESEARCH ON THE INTERNET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Snopes is great for debunking right wing e-mail propoganda!
Pelosi is not the only victim of this. If you do a search on Snopes on "ACLU" or "Hillary Clinton" you'll find some really despicable right-wing e-mail fabrications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Almost sounds like a parody
The right wing doesn't let the truth get in the way of a good story when it comes to e-mail propoganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC