Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:22 AM
Original message |
Poll question: How much of Hillary's support is because she is a woman? |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 02:37 AM by Clarkie1
O.K., somebody had to ask it sooner or later (getting flame-retardant suit on).
I think it would be a great thing for a woman to be President of the United States, but
1. The idea of "political dynasties" in America really turns me off. I think it's unhealthy in a liberal democracy, frankly.
2. I'd like to see the first woman President achieve her dream independently of her husband's former achievements, popularity and name recognition. I think it would be a lot healthier and send a more positive message to young American girls that they don't have to be married to a President in order to become President (also see #1 in this regard).
3. I know they say all's fair in love, war, and politics, but Hillary is benefiting vastly from Bill's connections and $$$ raising capability. This just doesn't seem fair to other candidates who are "making it on their own," however the saying goes (see also #2 in this regard)
So now, back to the original question....
|
TwentyFive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Depends on gender of the voter. Costs her votes among some men - picks up some from women |
|
I'd say the gender issue is about a wash. If it was an advantage, more women would be running, no?
|
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I suspect it's a net advantage among Democrats. |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 02:32 AM by Clarkie1
Naturally, Democrats as a group would be more enthusiastic about electing women and/or minorities than Republicans, I think. Of course, that's a broad statement and there would be many exceptions to the rule.
|
TwentyFive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. No, I think you're correct. GOP men hate/fear women, its almost in their platform. |
|
Besides the religious right who view women's role as subservient to men, many GOP men have issues about women in authority. I'll bet there are more than a few GOP congressmen who pay hookers to perform kinky activities on them with whips & black rubber gloves. Kind of like that John Bolton thing, ya know?
|
smirkymonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:31 AM
Response to Original message |
2. How much of her opposition is due to her gender? |
|
I would say quite a bit more.
|
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message |
5. A "certain gender?" What, it's UNMENTIONABLE that she is a female? Sheesh... NT |
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. nah...I was just trying for a more interesting and wordy title for the thread. nt |
election_2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Half is because she's a woman, the other half is because she's a Clinton |
|
She has done nothing in the U.S. Senate that qualifies her to be president above and beyond anyone else who could run for prez (I'm excluding Obama, because I think he'll decide against running).
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The people I know who like her, like her because they just like her |
|
and not because she's Bill's wife or a woman. People in northern NY where I live fell in love with her like no other politician I've ever seen. She's got that kind of magic, whether you want to believe it or not.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |