Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would we be in Iraq today if Congress had done their job?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:46 PM
Original message
Would we be in Iraq today if Congress had done their job?
Not only with giving up their authority to declare war but their lack of oversight of any kind? Their "rubber-stamping" of billions and billions of dollars for unexplained expenditures in Iraq? Their total disregard of $9 billion missing dollars?

If the Congress had asked the questions they should have and if they had done their job, would we be in the mess we find ourselves in today in Iraq? I hope the lesson has been learned. I hope the Democratic majority does not turn into a subservient branch of the White House, as the Republicans did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. Our leaders have let us done on so many levels. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, I doubt it and
* likely wouldn't be there for a second term either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, I think Shrub would have invaded Iraq anyway!
He has done EVERYTHING he wanted to do by mis-interpreting the laws and giving him supreme authority "as CIC in a time of war". He was hell bent on invading Iraq even before he got into the WH, and between him and Gonzo and the rest of 'em, they'd have found a way!

As far as the oversight...or lack of it, I can hear the excuses now. We can't give THAt kind of confidential info to Congress! It jeopardizes national security. They've been using that BS on almost all the issues that did manage to be questioned.

yes, the Pubs rolled over for ShrubCo, and I wonder if it's because of what he has on a lot of them? I doubt we'll ever know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Congress had done their job...
way the fuck back when, and enforced white collar crime laws, if Reagan-omics hadn't opened the door to mass-theft..further enriching already way too rich people.. if the people actually got to elect candidates who weren't pre-approved by the ruling elite..if..if..if
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed and Well Said.
This didn't just start with the 109th Do Nothing Congress. It's been a game of smoke and mirrors for far, far too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. After 9/11
Bush thought he was invincible. He was going to run the country in his own way. Congress saw his numbers increase & they felt we should allow him to do what he wants because we clearly cannot ever have the people against us again. In other words they felt they had a dictatorship that will have elections every now then because of the law, but people are so happy with them they will keep on re-electing them. But how the mighty have fallen. Soon we will have this country running again with the principles the fore-fathers intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Congress and the media.
At least a few people in Congress were doing their job. A majority of Democrats voted against the Iraq War. The media chose to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. no.
And those of them, current and past, who hold higher aspirations, should not be rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC