Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOT LEAVING IRAQ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:31 AM
Original message
NOT LEAVING IRAQ
Do the Democrats get it yet? He's NOT LEAVING IRAQ

It seems to be slowly dawning on Harry Reid that Commander Codpiece has no intention of giving up on his not-so-Excellent Adventure in Iraq:
"I just didn't feel there today, the president in his words or his demeanor, that he is going to do anything right away to change things drastically. He is tepid in what he talks about doing. Someone has to get the message to this man that there have to be significant changes."
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16198013.htm

Someone needs to get the message to Harry Reid that the only ones who can send that message are the new Democratic congress, and they're going to have to make their point quite forcefully or be ignored, just as the Iraq Survey Group is going to be ignored. How many times can people watch the same behavior and not see it for what it is? Bush will change nothing. NOTHING.

From US News:
"We have a classic case of circling the wagons," says a former adviser to Bush the elder. "If President Bush changes his policy in Iraq in a fundamental way, it undermines the whole premise of his presidency. I just don't believe he will ever do that."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20061208/ts_usnews/bushreactiontoreportworriesfathersaides

It hasn't been that long since Bush invited numerous former officials from various administrations to consult on Iraq, including former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. These officials knew going in that there was small enough likelihood that their recommendations would have a significant effect on policy on the ground, but they surely must have been shocked when the Pretender whisked in for brief photo-ops before and after and filed their advice in the nearest waste receptacle. Just like his rearranging the deck chairs after a narrow squeaking victory in 2004, just like his firing of Donald Rumsfeld, it was a surface ploy designed to draw attention to the illusion of change, designed to draw people's eyes away from the fact that nothing is going to change. It was a move as devoid of substance as his puerile speeches. HE WILL CHANGE NOTHING.

As Josh Marshall notes:
"What a pitiful coward this man is. Maybe if I just sort of shuffle the papers a bit and clear my throat everybody will get off my case. That's his response."
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/011466.php

None of this is news to anyone who has watched this pathetic specimen for the last six years. Two countries are held captive to this infant's psychopathic ego, and the discourse in Washington, carefully polished by an utterly corrupt news media, is still all about finding ways to avoid declaring that the President is a Dangerous Nut. Let all Americans be clear about that now: Bush is a Dangerous Nut. He has progressed beyond the Nixon Zone, a bad place where the president uses the law to protect himself and his cronies, rather than to serve the country. He has progressed to a place where the US Army is a substitute for his own shriveled penis, and he thrusts it anywhere he feels like making his manhood known.

Bush tells aides he doesn't want to "outsource" his role as commander in chief. Some Bush allies say this is a way to buy some time as the president tries to decide how to deal with rising pressure to alter his strategy in Iraq and hopes the critical media focus on the Iraq war will soften.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20061208/ts_usnews/bushreactiontoreportworriesfathersaides


NOT LEAVING IRAQ.

The only reliable key to Bush's behavior is what he does when challenged: he folds. Donald Rumsfeld is the perfect illustration of this. He was sacrificed to keep Bush afloat amidst overwhelming unpopularity, and that unpopularity is deepening across the country as more and more people come to the disturbing realization that the president is indeed a Dangerous Nut. It matters not that there is one less dangerous nut in the administration as long as the Dangerous-Nut-In-Chief remains resolute about his disastrous war. The only way to make this bastard understand is to peel away his key aides through scandal and downfall, just as Nixon was deprived of all his men. That is the only message that will resonate with this desperate idiot.

The new Democratic congress must investigate and aggressively prosecute all the corruption emanating from the top layers of this administration. Nothing less will get his attention.

He must be challenged.

They must also make further funding for the fiasco contingent upon immediate troop reduction. Fight him hard and make him pay for every dollar that his useless war machine demands. Make him beg. Humiliate him, because nothing else will make him respect anyone. If things progress far enough, he will change course, but not willingly, and not without one hell of a congressional confrontation. You, Mr. Reid, and you, Mrs. Pelosi, and all of your colleagues, must get up on top of his back and box him about the head and ears, repeatedly, until you are certain he hears you.

George wants everyone off his back. That is all he will accept. No changes, no concessions unless forced by hard circumstance. He is a child, and ultimately he must be treated as such. The Democrats have less than a year to challenge him if they want the White House, less than a year to even attempt to tackle six years of perfidy and plunder. Less than a year to make George Bush understand: we won't get off your back until we are OUT. OF. IRAQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. When will the Dem leadership stop treating him as they would treat a sane person?
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 12:37 AM by Fridays Child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why is it that they ever expected
him to listen to reason? Didn't they learn that he is not a man of his word from the IWR vote? So many of them that voted for it said later that they took him at his word, that he wouldn't use force until all other alternatives had been tried and yet they really expect reason from him now. It doesn't make sense. It was a mistake of judgement then and worse now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. no hidey-hole for shrub
We will MAKE him take the blame for his atrocities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Corporate america wants to stall any plans to leave Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wrong: bu$h Will change something...
Pissypants Will make it worse.

Unless:

Investigate. Inform (quickly). Impeach. Indict. Imprison all PNACers.

(Libby is first in line... Don't stop there!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. the BushCo agenda for Iraq is permanent control of a) the oil, and . . .
b) the region (thus the permanent bases and the world's largest embassy) . . . neither of these will be accomplished if we leave -- so we're staying . . . at least as long as they're in control . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit Donating Member (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush will go down with the ship. It's obvious. He isn't jumping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. 'Crazy' George needs a reality jolt!
He really believes he's on the throne, and it's all about his 'vision'. He's the problem, and should be removed. And don't forget his a-hole buddy, Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush will change nothing. -- The ball is now in the Dems court...
We voted them in let's see what Pelosi and the "new" crew are made of?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC