Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary/Obama 08!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JeremyWestenn Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:15 PM
Original message
Hillary/Obama 08!

Who's with me people?

It's my prediction that that is what our ticket shall be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, if the media gets to pick the candidate...we might be stuck with it.
I will NEVER vote for Hillary for president.

is that clear enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeremyWestenn Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Then you will be voting for the Republicans.

Plain and simple. If you don't vote for the Democrat, and seeing as how we have never in the history of our nation really had a viable winnable third party candidate since Gods know how long ago, you will be casting a vote against the Democrats which means you will essentially be giving an extra vote for the Republicans.

If you do that... Why are you posting on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Voting for a third party is not the same as voting Republican
I think in too many cases, the sad truth is that voting Democratic is the same as voting Republican. There are too many Zell Millers and Joe Liebermans in the Democratic Party.

People always tell me that voting third-party is a waste of my vote. My perspective is that nearly everything in our American system is in need of reform. I think anything I do which does not express my discontent is a waste of time. Therefore voting for one of the two major party candidates is a wasted vote because it does not do anything to reform our primitive and short-sighted system. This is not true in all cases, but I see too many races where it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeremyWestenn Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If it helps the Republicans win then it is to the core helping the Republicans.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 11:08 PM by JeremyWestenn
When you'd rather have the Democrats in Congress as oppose to them. And if you would rather all Republicans and Democrats, or the majority, were out and replaced with third party candidates then why on earth are you on Democratic Underground?

I'm confounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Not necessarily.
In my state, for example, the ticket you've prescribed would lose by 20 percent of the vote. Period. End of discussion.

Therefore, my vote for a third-party candidate wouldn't effect the outcome in my state what-so-ever.

In conclusion, my vote wouldn't help or hurt them; therefore, it doesn't "help" the Republicans, either. It just allows me to vote my conscious. It would be different if there was only a 1 percent margin or so, but that ticket wouldn't even break the 15 percent differential here, so I needn't worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. not if i vote third party.
i can't vote for a candidate i don't support.
and hillary's vote for the iwr(for starters) means that she gets NO vote from me, EVER.
you can use whatever twisted logic you need to spin that whatever way you want it.

and then squat on it, why don'cha...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeremyWestenn Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You can still try to pretend your vote will count.

Because it won't. All it will do is count for the opposition against Hillary(If she indeed gets the nomination) and subsequently it will be a vote for a Republican.

You can use whatever twisted logic you need to spin that, whatever way you want.

Then squat on it, why don'cha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. whatever twisted logic you need to use to stroke yourself is fine by me-
why don't we wait and see if hillary slithers her way into a nomination in the first place- i'm betting it won't happen. and definitely hoping it won't happen, because we're going to need someone A LOT stronger than her to clean up the mess the current mis-administration is going to leave behind, PLUS prepare us for the future that global warming has in store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Of course, Kerry and Edwards also voted for the IWR. Did you go Green in 2004?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. well it would seem so, wouldn't it...?
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 11:24 PM by QuestionAll
i also knew that being from illinois, my non-vote for that ticket really wouldn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. I'm only 18, so I didn't get to vote in '04
But yes, I would have voted for Ralph Nader (who wasn't on the Green ticket but ran independent). Someone here on DU actually convinced me a few days ago that Kerry was strongly against the war and that his vote for the IWR was highly qualified and critical of the path the Bush Administration was taking at the time. I didn't know that in '04, and so that would have been one of the reasons I would have voted against him in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I guess unified isn't a Liberal word. How sad you are biased.
Why do you hate America?

Would you rather have McCain or Rudy the phony as pResident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. "hillary" is DEFINITELY NOT a liberal word.
why don't we wait to see who the candidate is before casting people out for not supporting hillary's divine right to the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Whatever, I see the Thuglicans. influence is already starting
Why do you hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Indeed - why not wait to see who'd one really wants in the general - a Dem or
real GOP.

"hillary's divine right to the nomination" may not play out, or if it plays out, it may annoy - but she is a true good left of center - not center - Dem -

and those who say otherwise are blowing smoke and prefer to see good political moves like taking the steam out of a Constitutional flag vote via a Federal law bill as raging support for things from the right.

I know her head was in the right place on Health in 93 before Bill ordered a task force that could not look at single payer national health - if it is still in that right place, why are the folks so quick to dump her?

She is the only Dem to beat McCain in a real National Poll - albeit the poll had her middle name included on the Hillary line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. if you think that hillary and the other dlc-oids are left of center-
then you've got a pretty twisted notion of just where the "center" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. I guess we disagree - I base my opinion on the social and economic positions
Hillary has taken over the last 25 years.

On what issue is the center to her left? She was the only person in the room pushing single payer national health in 93 (it was my professional business to know this fact at the time).

Perhaps because she is not "out now" on Iraq she is right of center? On this one she is right of myself - but I don't think she is right of center with phased withdrawel.

In any case, we will need to agree to disagree. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. I refuse to vote for someone I don't support
I don't care if it means Satan will become president, or worse, George W. Bush. As far as I know, the electors in my state aren't bound by the popular vote anyway, so a presidential vote doesn't count anyway. It has absolutely no legal bearing on the outcome of the election, it just becomes a suggestion on whose name the electors should put down. But since so much of what I do is in protest of our egregiously misguided system, I don't see a reason to cave and vote for the lesser of two evils. I'd rather vote for a definite loser who doesn't offend my conscience.

BTW, it "conscience," not "conscious." Conscious is an adjective (or adverb) meaning aware or otherwise possessed of one's sensory faculties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like it! :-) but no firm support until I hear the health care plan and the SS wage cap removal
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 10:33 PM by papau
(with the health care plan using insurance companies for administrative services only as we do now for Medicare) and income taxation changed so we are treating investment income the same as wage income as to tax rate - stopping the current taxing of wage income at a higher rate than investment income - investment income that is going 90% to the rich and corporate.

A quick walk away from Iraq if it has not happened already, getting the Afghanistan government to be in control of more than the city of Kabul, a redo on the IMF and the WTC and the World Bank to get environmental, minimum wage, union rights, and human rights at the front of the line in any development or trade proposal, and pressure on Israel/PA to accept Taba/Geneva as currently written, all the while reining in our CIA adventures against any country not kissing the ass of the rich and corporate - would be the foreign policy I'd want to hear they are supporting.


Oh - one more thing - I also want a plug-in hybrid under my tree 12/25/08.

Yep - the above would "buy" my vote for that ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GenDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm in!
Just finished working on Hillary's senate race and really like Obama a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. How 'bout .......... "Someone else/Obama"
Because the way you had it....

Hillary/Obama 08!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd prefer to have someone less polarizing than Clinton
I hope she isn't the nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hill The Republican Shill - How About a Dem At The Top of the Ticket?
- Still supports the Iraq War
- "Free" trade - adios jobs!
- Both "Patriot" Acts
- One of the two draconian bankruptcy laws
- Likely proxy attacks on Howard Dean at the DNC (hasn't disclaimed them)
- Fled like a terrified pup from censuring Bush

and so forth. We need a Democrat for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. thanks but no thanks
there will be a good cantidate to run for the office of presadent and vice , this just is'nt going to be the one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Why would Obama sink his chances with being on a ticket that loses in a landslide
I think Obama is smarter than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
20. Anyone Else/Anyone Else 08! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm thinking it'll be Obama-Richardson
Not necessarily my favorite ticket (although I could be quite happy with it); but it seems a pretty logical ticket, unless it'll turn off too many white voters that there isn't any full-blooded white man on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Obama/Biden or Richardson
Would be an odd couple but Obama could use Biden's foreign policy experience same with Richardson.

It's great there is a line of diverse democrats to pick from. Napolatino, Richardson, Obama, Clinton... there is nothing wrong with this picture. Have you heard of ANY diversity in the Republican lineup. Didn't think so :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama-Clark is the sickest ticket out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. Gore/Obama is a kickass ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. NOW you're talking! :)
Hillary, no way, ever. Gore/Obama...YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. i sure hope not
opportunism + inexperience? not a good bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. One word:
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
30. It won't be Hillary/Obama. It'll be Hillary OR Obama
I doubt if either one wants to be VP. I think Hillary would make a fine president if she could find a way to win the general election. I think Obama would make a great president, and I think he WOULD win the general election. IMO, Barack Obama is just the medicine this country needs to re-unite it and heal the divisive wounds from 8 years of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am the polar opposite of "with you" on this.
We do want to win, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Is that you, "Corporal Cueball"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clinton or Clark, if nominated, will pick the other. It's a done deal and has been for years. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. How about
Two Candidates that would actually win the fucking election.

That would be a good place to start...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC