Let's stop messing around.......

[guidod]

I say Gore/Obama for 2008, who else agrees with me?

[bigwillq]

1. I like Obama as a VP choice in 2008

Then he could run in 2016.

[Fridays Child]

2. While it's not my dream ticket, I would enthusiastically support it.

[bigwillq]

4. What's your dream ticket?

:shrug:

[Fridays Child]

10. With the emphasis on dream, it's...

[guidod]

12. Gore/Dean is good...

...I think Obama is a rock star right now and would bring in a lot of the young vote.

[Casablanca]

20. Agreed, except for the Obama == rock star meme.

Gore/Dean or Dean/Kucinich. That's the ticket.

[guidod]

11. Gore/Obama!

:dem:

[Lasthorseman]

3. Ok

Gore yes.
Obama+patriot act renewal.....eeewwww...not nice.

[Infinite Hope]

5. Obama should wait. He's too eager. 2 years and then a presidential run?

Besides his lack of experience, he'll look extremely opportunistic once his honeymoon period ends.

[guidod]

13. Lincoln

was in a state congress for 2 years. I don't go for t hat argument. :shrug:

[Infinite Hope]

14. But Lincoln's presidency wasn't as glorious as it's made out to be.

It was full of turmoil and aside from the war (toward the end, at that) it was seen as an ineffective administration.

[guidod]

17. I was just trying to point out

that I don't think the experience is an issue.

[Infinite Hope]

24. You're right, that can certainly be true.

Experience is "relevant, but not determinative."

[liberal N proud]

6. Edwards/ Obama

But if Gore/ Obama was the ticket, no problem voting for them.

[etherealtruth]

7. I'd go for Gore and Obama ...

I really would like a Gore John Edwards ticket. Gore/Obama is good, too

[AtomicKitten]

8. In my world, I just voted 50,000 times.

[SaveElmer]

9. Not my number 1 choice...but

Certainly one I would have no trouble getting enthusiastic about!!!

[nickshepDEM]

15. Nope - Obama/Dont Care

If he doesnt run I'll take Edwards/Dont Care

[Clarkie1]

16. I think that would be a strong ticket, actually.

Just not my first choice, or the ticket most likely to achieve victory.

So....no.

[Bullet1987]

18. ...

It was full of turmoil and aside from the war (toward the end, at that) it was seen as an ineffective administration.

The war was going to happen regardless. North vs South sentament had been festering for years. There was little Lincoln could do about that except preserve the Union...which he did.

[bowens43]

19. Gore is a loser. We don't need retreads.

[BeFree]

22. Gore is a winner

We are the losers. You need to get that straight.

[ms liberty]

28. Drive-by insult strikes again...

Again, I ask: Do you have any actual reasons for disliking Gore? Reasons perhaps based on reality, not on your unsubstantiated opinion?

I repeat: AL GORE WON IN 2000.

[Jennicut]

21. Gore Obama, Gore with anyone

is fine with me, i just want him to run. Hillary is more of a retread than Gore is. We need another Clinton like we need another Bush. There are many, many people who lost races and have come back 2 or 4 or 8 years later and won them. Reagan. Nixon. I think Obama can help energize people because he is fresh blood and Gore has the knowledge and experience. I would go for it.

[eppur_se_muova]

23. Gore/Anybody but Liebermann again.

(Not that I for a moment think there's a chance in Hell Holy Joe would get it, but for the record...)

[Infinite Hope]

26. It should have been Feingold the first time. It was between him and Lieberman.

And he chose Lieberman...I'd guess at the insistence of party officials.

[eppur_se_muova]

27. Feingold would have been a great choice. Talk about lost opportunity. nt

[Renew Deal]

25. I don't disagree

:shrug:

[ms liberty]

29. I say Gore/Anyone...so it works for me!