Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

J.Dennis Hastert may retire in March

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 12:27 PM
Original message
J.Dennis Hastert may retire in March
Right now its only talk. But Hastert has been grooming Tom Cross a State Senator to take his place. Cross is a far right Bush Supporter all the Way. Here is hoping Hastert goes. John is thinking about running again. This would be a head to head race. I like John a Veteran with a heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. When a Rep. leaves in mid term, doesn't the Gov. appoint someone to finish
out his term? I thought that was the one BIG advantage of electing Dem Governors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep But a Special election will be called
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Appointed Senators
Appointed Senators

The 17th Amendment to the Constitution (1913) established direct election of senators, as well as a means of filling vacant Senate seats. If a vacancy occurs due to a senator's death, resignation, or expulsion, the 17th Amendment allows state legislatures to empower the governor to appoint a replacement to complete the term or to hold office until a special election can take place. There are a few exceptions to this rule. The states of Oregon, Wisconsin and Massachusetts do not allow the governor to appoint, but rather require special elections to fill a vacancy. Oklahoma allows the governor to appoint under certain circumstances, and a few states require the governor to appoint a replacement of the same political party as the previous incumbent. Typically, a replacement holds office until the next scheduled statewide election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. House of Representatives procedure
Edited on Tue Jan-02-07 12:48 AM by LiberalFighter
Source

The Constitution provides for cases in which House seats become vacant in Article
I, Section 2, clause 4:

When Vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive
Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.
The Constitution thus requires that all House vacancies be filled by special election.
There is no constitutional provision for the appointment of interim Representatives.
Scheduling. The responsibility for scheduling special elections is vested in the
state legislatures (2 U.S.C. 8):

The time for holding elections in any State, District, or Territory for a Representative
to fill a vacancy, whether such vacancy is caused by the death, resignation, or
incapacity of a person elected, may be prescribed by the laws of the several States and
Territories respectively.

House vacancies that occur in the first session of a Congress are invariably filled by
special elections. The responsibility for ordering a special election is vested in the
governors of the states. Most states also either set a window of time, or prescribe an exact
number of days after the vacancy occurs, in which nomination procedures and the special
election must be held. Within these constraints, state governors and election authorities
generally attempt to schedule special elections for a regular election day, in the interests
of economy, convenience, and increased voter participation.

Procedures governing vacancies occurring during the second session of a Congress
differ from state to state, and are largely dependent on the amount of time intervening
between the vacancy and the next general election. For instance, if a House seat becomes
vacant within six months of the expiration of the previous incumbent’s term, many states
allow the seat to remain vacant for a time, providing for a special election to be held on
the regularly scheduled election day, at the same time that a regular election for that seat
for the ensuing Congress is held. Other states, under these circumstances, do not provide
for a special election, and the affected seat remains vacant until the ensuing Congress
convenes the following January.

Nominations. Nomination procedures for House of Representatives special
elections vary as widely among the states as do those for the Senate. Some states require
a special primary election to determine the major party nominees, while minor party and
independent candidates generally qualify by filing a requisite number of petitions for
general election ballot placement. A plurality is sufficient to elect in most primary states,
but some southern states require a majority to nominate in the primary. If no candidate
attains a majority, then a runoff, or second, primary is held at a later date, in which the
two candidates winning the most primary votes compete for the nomination. Others
provide for nomination by such party-established procedures as party congressional
district caucuses and conventions, or meetings of party committees or interested party
members in jurisdictions comprising the affected congressional district.

General Elections. Special general election procedures for the House of
Representatives generally mirror those for the Senate, with some variations. Once again,
in most states a plurality is sufficient to elect in the general election. Several states,
however, have adopted procedures for House special elections that effectively conjoin the
nomination and election process, sometimes in combination with other variations. These
include California, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas.

CRS-5

All qualified candidates for House special elections in California compete in a
special primary, regardless of party affiliation. Nomination is by petition. Any candidate
receiving more than 50% of the vote in the primary is elected, and the general election is
canceled. If no candidate receives the required majority, the single candidate of each
party receiving the most votes competes in a special general election, wherein a plurality
of votes is sufficient to elect. In the event that candidates of only one party compete in
the primary, a plurality is sufficient to elect, and there is no general election.8

As noted previously, Georgia requires a majority to elect in all congressional and
statewide special elections. If no candidate receives 50% of the vote, then a runoff, or
second, election is held between the two candidates gaining the most votes.9

Louisiana procedures for House special elections are the same as those applying to
its Senate elections. All candidates who qualify for ballot access compete in the primary
election, in which a majority of votes is necessary to elect. A candidate receiving 50%
of the vote is declared elected. If no candidate receives a majority, the two candidates
receiving the most votes, regardless of party affiliation, compete in a second election,
termed a general election. Louisiana mandates the all-parties primary for regular as well
as special elections.10

Texas provides for an all-parties special primary election to fill House vacancies.
All candidates qualifying for placement on the ballot participate in the election, in which
a majority is necessary to elect. A candidate receiving 50% of the vote is declared
elected. If no candidate receives a majority, the two candidates receiving the most votes,
regardless or party affiliation, compete in a second election, termed a runoff in Texas.
Unlike in Louisiana, in Texas the all-parties primary is unique to special elections.11

Winners of House special elections held concurrently with those for the ensuing
Congress are often not sworn in as Members of the House of Representatives, since
Congress has usually adjourned sine die before election day. They are, however, accorded
the status of incumbent Representatives for the purposes of seniority, office selection, and
staffing.

Staff Disposition. Staff of a deceased or resigned Representative are compensated
until a successor is elected to fill the vacancy, performing duties under the direction of the
Clerk of the House (2 U.S.C. 92 b,c).


Copied and pasted as is from source. Typos not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gov only place a senator in place if one leaves.
Reps have to have a new election. So lets get the candidate and support him to overcome the Hastert plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ahh, OK, thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. John is the best of America
Hope the Hasert voters are pleased now that they voted to keep their pork and their good ol'boy and they end up with neither.

I really hope John runs again. I will support him in anyway I can.
After the election I received a thank you letter from John with a REAL signature. It was really sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. John Laesch came closer to winning than anyone in 6 years..


According to the info on his website!


2002
Larry Quick (D) 47,165 (26%)
Dennis Hastert (R) 135,198
Total 182,363

2004
Ruben Zamora (D) 87,590 (31%)
Dennis Hastert (R) 191,618
Total 279, 208

2006
John Laesch (D) 77,065 (40%)
Dennis Hastert (R) 114,385
Total 191,450


I hope Hastert does retire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe it's just more than his tender little ego can bear - to come back
to Congress in January as one of the rank 'n' file. No title. No leadership. No nothing. And worst of all, he'll have to watch "his" gavel being wielded by a GIRL. A Democrat no less. And one from (gasp!) San Francisco!!! If he does leave, I'll bet that's the reason why. He just won't be able to take it. He should have quit while he was ahead. Now he leaves - as a goat. In fact, he should already have resigned, having presided over a huge disaster for his party. Even newt did that after the impeachment/persecution of Clinton ran aground in the Senate. He failed to see it through to completion, AND there was lots of shit that came out in the meantime about how many times he'd cheated on, and dumped, a SERIES of wives.

Perhaps denny thought he could (pardon the visual pun) stomach it. But if this is true, evidently he's thought about it for awhile and has concluded he can't handle it, after all. If so, good riddance. He's set up nicely in any event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You sayin' he's a chicken?
...LOL, I love this part..

"And worst of all, he'll have to watch "his" gavel being wielded by a GIRL. A Democrat no less. And one from (gasp!) San Francisco!!!"


~~~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. In order to "spend more time with his family"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC