Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who are the rethugs the most afraid of in 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who are the rethugs the most afraid of in 2008?
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 04:31 PM by caledesi
My own opinion after trolling freeperville is that they were so afraid of Hillary, now the big fear is Obama. You can tell by the amount of threads and the endless, repetitive comments from OxyRush.

I may have forgetten some running. Feel free to include under OTHER.

NOTE: Not your favorite candidate, but who you honestly feel scares the rethugs.

edit: usual stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure they're afraid of Obama . . .
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 04:32 PM by MrModerate
He's well spoken and not batshit crazy or sociopathic, which puts him up on any of the leading 'Licans.

But Obama is scary because he's hot right now. And maybe he'll stay hot and be taking the Oath of Office in January 2009.

But it's still Hillary they're most afraid of, and once Obama cools off a bit, you'll see that fear reemerge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is what the Bugman Delay predicts: Clinton/Obama fwiw nt
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 05:25 PM by caledesi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Obama has made it very clear he is not running for VP..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's why they keep pushing him down our throats?
Hardly.

The media won't mention the person they're most scared of.

(P.S. I don't dislike Obama, at all. I just find your logic a bit off.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Clark has his own mouthpiece on Faux. It drives the freepers nuts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. They must be most afraid of Kucinich
by that logic.

Actually, I think that's true of the corporate media, who don't want his ideas getting to the public. I don't think that's true of the Republicans in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. They're usually most afraid
of who they talk about the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That hasn't been my experience. They can't wait to smear
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 04:55 PM by caledesi
Hillary and Obama. They are afraid of the least mentioned? Laughable. There are so many threads about Vilsack. :sarcasm:

Furthermore, why is it that the rethugs are sending out the "swiftboat" brigade to find "dirt" on Obama?

They are disgusting - telling others to find "dirt" on someone.

edit: usual stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. You're fooling yourself
They don't give a squat about Obama, who couldn't be elected president of his street.
They're scared shitless of Clark, Gore, etc.

Obama is nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. If the Right is afraid of Clark, why does FOX News employ him
giving him free air-time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. BINGO!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. BTW, I there are a decent amount of threads about Clark.
They hate him of course. I Like Clark.

We have so many great candidates. Must be driving the rethugs crazy.

Clark
Clinton
Obama
Edwards
Richardson
Gore...list goes on.

Who do they have? Uh, McCain (who neo-cons hate); Guiliani? (he is so liberal)...the list goes on. They are not happy with any of their candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. clark of course
that's why he's ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooga booga Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I believe that Clark will flip some red states
Pretty scary stuff from a Republican point of view.

By the way, the name of the game will be flipping Red states to Blue to capture that all important 270 electoral votes.

We gotta capture the White House this time, gang. Your guy. My guy. Whoever it is. We gotta get the big one into the boat this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clark....as it is as if he doesn't exist, this 4 star Democratic General during times of war....
Maybe they ignore Wes because he is such an oximoron based on the very carefully cultivated CW? :shrug:

Here's my longer answer, if you care:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2983884&mesg_id=2984064
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. Meh...fighting dems got less than 10% wins
Military experience doesn't mean anything to the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. A Southern general with a populist message who isn't afraid
to get back in the faces of the Republicans and their media lapdogs?

The person they're most scared of is who is most viable, yet gets little to no mention in the media. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
43. No shit. The war busted the GOP's chops. Clark is number one...
Edited on Sat Dec-16-06 12:59 AM by BikeWriter
on the list of people equipped to get us out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulip Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. FR Bayh, Bayh ,Bayh
They know he's got a clean record and they fear him. They have been trying to figure out ways to attack him since he made Kerry's short list in 04. Free Republic coined the term Bye Bayh. So whenever I read that phrase on a liberal board I know they are doing their job at selling negative info on Bayh on the net.

From FR site:

"He is our biggest threat. Bayh would carry Indiana. With Richardson as V.P they would also carry N.M. That's two Red states turning blue."

"I gotta agree with other Hoosiers here. Bayh did a few good things in the past (like sponsoring the president's Iraq War resolution in the Senate). But he's done a lot more that's harmful, and now he's gone way off into the fringes of the left."

"He's hugely popular here. Just won re-election with over 60% of the vote."

"Indiana was a strongly red state for Pres. Bush.
A real opponent for Bayh needs to be found."

"IN MY HUMBLE OPINION:

1) he's nice looking (and don't say that doesn't count for anything anymore); 2) people remember his daddy; 3) he graduated from IU; 4) when he and his wife (Barbie Doll) had their twins while Pretty Boy was in office, the Indianapolis media (biggest and most powerful in the state) made a huge deal over them; the media family facade continues to this day.

I voted for Pretty Boy the last two times he has run for office. Today, I am really upset at my decision to support him. Planning to drop a taxpayer e-mail his way this afternoon."

"Yup. He has sided with the nuts of the party."

"I have called in several times ton Garrison's show to say that he is NOT a moderate. He talks "Hoosier values" in Indiana, then does whatever the Rat bosses tell him to.

He probably thinks he is safe because he just got reelected. I also think he is going to run in 2008 for the presidency.

We had better have a charismatic guy to run against him. He will be a formidable opponent."

"In his first term, he voted against President President Bush's tax plan, John Ashcroft's nomination for AG, and other measures.

At one point Senator Bayh would appear on MSNBC Hardball on the left with Katrina and the rest of the Red Army.
But in Indiana he is still considered it's golden boy.

I will actively work against his presidential primary bid if he announces one."

" Put down that blue highlighter and step away! Indiana for Bayh would represent a tremendous and ahistorical Rep to Dem swing. In order to get nominated, Bayh will have to leftify himself beyond Hoosier recognition. The Republican candidate will hopefully not be without his own appeal.

Way too soon to be handing Red states out to any Dem Ticket."

"Evan has successfully positioned himself (pretended) as a moderate in the Bill Clinton mold. Most here know he is a true lefty, but he is not likely to be unelected anytime soon ...

Actually, he could be a threat on the '08 ticket as a VP. The MSM would adore him as a 'moderate' from the heartland, etc."

"Actually, he could be a threat on the '08 ticket as a VP. The MSM would adore him as a 'moderate' from the heartland, etc.

They said the same about John Edwards not too long ago."





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's nothing to fear - hell, we might as well be voting
for a Republican if that's what his record truly is (and I don't know - this is from the Freeps, after all, who aren't necessarily the smartests policy wonks in the jar).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Bayh is a red herring. Puhleeze... Hey C2008, notice that these
are all the "fear" responses. There are some that just say Evan who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. As a fello' Clarkie, I have to agree with Tulip on this one..
The question has nothing to do what Democrats think about our candidates, but which ones the THUGS would fear the most.

Bayh is incredibly intelligent, and an unbelievably eloquent speaker. If he runs, he could do very well with moderates, centrists, and Independents.

THAT is the very type of candidate the freeps don't want us running. (Which is what the question was)

My guesses on who they would MOST love as our candidate is: Clinton, Kucinich, Kerry

My guess on who they would not like to see competing with whoever they wind up with is: Clark, Bayh, Edwards

Richardson? I'm not sure about just yet..

The questions is hard to answer this early out because we need to see our candidates on the trail. PLUS --- we don't even know yet what our final list of candidates will look like!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulip Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'd agree with Edwards & Clark
I would have to wade into freepville again to explore my hunch. I think freepers may feel able to fight Clinton and Obama if they put up McCain. I like Clinton & Obama alot but I'm trying to think like a freep.

Probably the ticket they'd fear the most against a McCain ticket might just be Edwards/Bayh. The next feared ticket may be Bayh/Clark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I might agree on its face.....however, in looking at that pairing closer (edwards/Bayh)
Picturing Bayh as Edwards' pit-bull Veep or viceversa is a hard image for me to conjure up.

I just don't see how Edwards and Bayh's (both voted for the IWR) become a threat to McCain/Giuliani, as they both would be trying to outhawk the hawks to prove their "Manliness". :shrug:

They may both be somewhat good looking (to those with that sort of taste), but I don't see the gravitas that would "scare" freepers or the media when it got right down to it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. More importantly, who could tell them apart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulip Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Add Clark to the mix and.......






They all look like they could be catalog models. But that's not the question. It's who the other side fears. And I think they'd fear a Bayh/Clark ticket big time.

Quick comparison.....

Bayh/Clark: Well liked Dems From Red States in the Midwest & South, Clark: Retired general who led NATO and led missions in Vietnam wounded 3 times, Rhodes Scholar,& Clark is signed on and infiltrated Fox News, Bayh: Senator on the Intelligence, Armed Services, and soon to be on the Energy Committees, Special Committee on Aging, helped Indiana go blue in 06, attended state school IU and law school Univ. of Virginia and a former governor.

McCain/Giuliani: West and North East... Senator, veteren, POW, Armed Services Committee, Senate on Indian Affairs, Committee on Science, Commerce & Trans. Giuliani: Time person of the year, NYC mayor, cut crime in NYC significantly & both are a little more to the middle...and support several pro Dem issues.

If I was in Freepville I'd be concerned about a Bayh/Clark ticket. The quotes in my first post are from Free Republic on Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Well stated. I specifically said to vote for the candidate that
rethugs will fear most, not your favorite.

Evan Bayh? Right. He's smart, but a cadaver.

BTW I am not exactly a Clarkie. I haven't decided yet.

I used to be a Deaniac, but we do know how that turned out. He's in the right place though.

I like Obama and could easily visualize a _______/Obama ticket. Oh yes. Exciting, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. Then you missed my point.
Why would they be scared of Bayh. If those are, indeed, his positions, then they'll HAVE a Republican president. Why wouldn't they like him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Bayh is as exciting as a vibrator in need of new battery
Tell Mama, I'm for Obama! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Yoo Hoo... Indiana... Bayh has a question for you.....

"Can you repeat what you just said?"



...."Did you REALLY compare me to a broken vibrator!?!?"

.....
....
...
..
.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrTriumph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Who are Republicans most afraid of? A special prosecutor.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. The GOP is confident that their Gawd, Guns, and Gays axis of propaganda
will come through for them once again, although it failed in 2006.

Honestly, I don't know who the GOP would fear the most. If Iraq is a total catastrophe in 2008, as I expect, the GOP should fear all of the Dems listed on this poll.

I voted for Gore, because he has a command of the most important national security issue in the century: global warming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timetoleave Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I think Gore...
because he is the one a lot of republican talking heads say they hope we put up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. George W Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyBob Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Indeed, Bush and his idiocy
are becoming ever more apparent. The ship is sinking, time to remove the cement shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. Probably Gore.
The results of the poll are laughable though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Why are the results laughable? Just asking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Well....
I laughed at whoever selected that Kucinich was their biggest fear.

I mean.. I seriously like the Congressman. But as presidential material?

It would be a kick for the person who selected him as the THUG's biggest threat to explain why they think so..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. no, they don't fear Kucinich
but they do fear what he represents. And the really funny thing is that so does the Democratic Party establishment.

If you go back and read the post where Kucinich was mentioned as the greatest threat, you'll notice that the suggestion was offered with a certain amount of irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. General Clark.
They aren't afraid of Hillary or Obama, they want Hillary desperately to be the one because they know they crush her and they have a ton of material to use against her. Obama too, would be easy for them to slander by playing the race card and the Islam card. Clark, on the other hand, has no real weak points for them to exploit, is highly qualified and would fight them at every step. A real leader who knows how to talk to red America is their worst nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. They don't fear Hillary. They hate her.
And they want her to be the nominee. Their hate-radio jocks have been bashing Hillary for so long its just kind of an automatic thing. The toy has been wound up and they'll keep going for a long while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. George Bush N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. Bayh
Because despite their best smear attempts, they know that several of the swing states that are inaccessible to Hillary and Kerry would break in Bayh's favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. The "New" Fighting Al Gore
He's so smart and angry, but channels his anger into awesome speeches. Has a great sense of humor and he will win dems & independents over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC