The case for impeachment of Bush and Cheney for their war crimes and criminal surveillance program is Clear, Compelling, and Complete. It has been for years. It is time to introduce articles of impeachment and convene Impeachment Hearings to make the case finalize the articles.
Other committees can go forward with whatever investigations they wish, but those investigations cannot be allowed to interfere with or delay impeachment. If "oversight" investigations uncover additional impeachable offenses, members can introduce a resolution to add them.
We're not looking at another Watergate here, where "cover up" was the name of the game. Bush and Cheney are committing their high crimes and abuses in plain sight. They admit their crimes in their public statements.
The case for impeachment is simple. Feingold's Censure motiion could easily serve as a case for impeachment. When Bush and Cheney attempted to nullify the principle of consent -- the sole moral principle on which our Constitution is founded -- with their claims to Un-American and Unconstitutional unitary authoritarian power, they didn't excuse their crimes, they compounded them.
There is a reason that violators of Geneva are subject to the death penalty -- to give those with the power to inflict torture or wage a criminal war of aggression a compelling motive not to step anywhere near "the line."
Their claims to the power to "redefine" Geneva are rightfully rejected by other parties to the treaty, just as we would reject any attempt by any other party to arbitrarily redefine the conventions so they could torture Americans.
Their attempt to "redefine" Geneva in and of itself is an admission of their intent to violate Geneva with Malice Aforethought.
And, to those who assert that investigations are needed to "bring the public on board"-- your assertion doesn't fly. Any hearings that are not explicitly held for the purpose of examining their high crimes and labeled "impeachment hearings" will garner little or no attention from the broadcast media (other than C-SPAN, which few Americans watch). The only way to "bring the public on board" is to introduce articles of impeachment and to take them up in Impeachment Hearings.
Members of Congress who unnecessarily delay with unnecessary investigations, or who invoke some other rationalization for their refusal to call for impeachment and removal, should consider this:
Are you willing to tell those who are currently being tortured that they will just have to endure it for now because {rationalization of the day}.
Failure to stop war crimes when you have the power to do so, is itself a war crime. Now that you have the power to stop the Bush and Cheney's war crimes by impeaching (Reps) and removing (Senators), will you refuse to act, and thus become a war criminal yourself?
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/pat_k/13