Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In total agreement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Casandra Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:45 PM
Original message
In total agreement
I am in total agreement with Dennis Kucinich. STOP FUNDING THIS FIASCO! Yank the funds and keep them yanked. Deliver the message, it's over! There is already enough money to bring the troops home. Only money will be for reconstruction of their country (which we destroyed) Turn this over to the U.N. for the rebuilding..and beyond that, let the Iraqi's have at it! Someone will come out on top, surely.. and this will decide who runs the country.

Obviously, it's all a stall tactic right now, to keep us there. Still hoping, I guess for that 'black gold' to become prosperous to us (if they can keep the equipment up and running, in one piece long enough) Permanent bases..etc..etc... As long as the shrub is in charge, you can forget getting out of there. That is NOT his goal. He will sacrifice anyone and everyone he has to, if he thinks it can save 'face'...

The Dems are going to have to 'step up'..but will they? I have my serious doubts they will do more than 'enable' this joke of a foreign policy. Does it feel hopeless?? Yes, at times, it does!

Just my opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree 100% n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The problem is, without the US, the UN's dead in the water.
John Bolton's recess presence there was more than plenty evidence of how much this "administration" is committed to being seriously cooperative with the UN.

So, as much as I sympathize on principle and in theory, calling in / depending on the UN to pawn off the "Iraq problem" is neither a feasible proposition, nor exactly helpful for Iraq and the entire region. And that latter is the crux, AFAIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC