Iraq troop buildup idea worries generals

[babylonsister]

December 20th, 2006 1:30 am
Iraq troop buildup idea worries generals

By Robert Burns / Associated Press

WASHINGTON - A White House laboring to find a new approach in Iraq said Tuesday it is considering sending more U.S. troops, an option that worries top generals because of its questionable payoff and potential backlash. President Bush said he is ready to boost the overall size of an American military overstretched by its efforts against worldwide terrorism.

The military's caution on shipping thousands of additional troops temporarily to Iraq is based on a fear that the move could be ineffective without bold new political and economic steps.

Commanders also worry that the already stretched Army and Marine Corps would be even thinner once the short-term surge ended. Bush's newly expressed interest in making the military larger would have little impact on that worry because it will take much longer to add substantially to the size of the military.

Generals also question whether sending more troops to Iraq would feed a perception that the strife in Iraq is mainly a military problem; in their view it is largely political, fed by economic distress.

Rep. Ike Skelton, the Missouri Democrat who will become chairman of the House Armed Services Committee next month, echoed those sentiments Tuesday. "I'm convinced the Army and the Marines are near the breaking point," Skelton said, while expressing skepticism that a big troop surge would be worth the trouble.

more...

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=8710

[WannaJumpMyScooter]

1. But, according to DOD, the idea came from

the Generals?

:shrug:

[babylonsister]

2. Sounds like another example of dimson claiming to listen to the

military powers while not really doing so. I don't know about the DoD, but the Joint Chiefs have major misgivings about the possibility of this 'surge'. :grr: