babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-20-06 11:58 PM
Original message |
How do we register our discontent if Congress votes for more $$ for Iraq? |
|
How can we combat that? Does anyone have any suggestions? Petitions?
|
BluegrassDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Pulling money for Iraq would be a huge political mistake |
|
We would be on the defensive and be bombarded with accusations of not supporting the troops and leaving them defenseless. That wouldn't be true of course, but that would be the accusations. That's not a way to start the '08 campaigns. If we did, we could lose the Congress and quick as we won it.
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Why the hell do we need to win congress if we won't do the |
|
right thing when we get it?
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I don't happen to agree. If * is going to get away with whatever he wants, |
|
I'd like to see him try to do it without money. The majority of Americans are sick of this war, our deficit, our dead and maimed. If not approving a new bill for more war is authorized, Americans might applaud. It could also be viewed as protecting troops if the pull-out starts sooner rather than later.
|
hijinx87
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. indeed, it is an unbelievably thorny issue |
|
if the Congressional dems defeat the funding bill, they probably get nailed exactly as you say. if they vote for the wrong bill in order to fund it, then the congressional democrats are suddenly complicit (on some level or other) in this whole ungodly mess.
this will take legislative skills of the first order.
it seems to me the solution is to vote in favor of funding legislation only if it contains concrete dates for troop draw down, and ultimate removal.
that way we end this disaster without giving the rethugs a club to beat us with in 2008.
|
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Oh geez, more political posturing while innocents die. |
|
Look, if we followed that advice, we will wind up staying in Iraq for many more years. This very same sentiment is what helped to drive the Vietnam war on for so long. You can't play politics with the lives of thousands upon thousands of innocents:shrug: You simply can't. Will it cost the party politically, I don't know. But quite frankly with people on all sides dying due to this absurb war, we don't have the luxury, or the moral authority to sacrifice others' lives for political gain, we simply don't. How do you tell a parent that their son died for Democratic gain?
Besides, the majority of people in this country want the war to end. This is why we have majority positions in both houses, because the American people want the troops home ASAP, and they want this achieved by any means possible. I suggest that we heed their wishes:shrug:
|
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message |
6. A very simple, Constitutionally sanctioned way of making our displeasure felt. |
|
Don't vote for those who wish to continue this war. This is why we have primary and general elections:shrug:
|
bluehighways911
(67 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 02:52 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Why Do You Have To Wait |
|
Tell them now. I think we are to blame. We just sit and watch.
And I don't mean all, you know who you are, but a lot of us. Why sit here all day and say, did you see what Bush did. Well Duh, what did you expect. And the same thing will happen tomorrow, unless we stop him. And your only hope is getting the Dems on board.
Tell your reps how you feel.
Organize groups to tell them.
Get your community involved.
I know the last two are not easy. But if you want something bad enough.
Is the netroots only going be useful for elections. Or are you going to start taking responsibility.
|
fuzzyball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Nominate Kucinich for president in 2008...there is nothing better |
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 03:22 AM
Response to Original message |
9. we whine and get in endless circular arguments with the DLC apologists |
|
whose job is to defuse the progressive energy here
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-21-06 03:31 AM
Response to Original message |
10. America won't abandon troops in the field |
|
When Congress cut funding to S. Vietnam, most of our troops were already out. In addition, funding was only cut in half, not completely. I don't expect anything different as we try to get out of Iraq.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |