Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For the record--the Ford pardon of Richard Nixon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:17 PM
Original message
For the record--the Ford pardon of Richard Nixon
It was said at the time you couldn't pardon an innocent man (at the time we still blieved in "innocent until proven guilty"). Gerald Ford proved otherwise and the rest is history...

President Ford's Pardon of Richard Nixon
September 8, 1974

Ladies and gentlemen:

I have come to a decision which I felt I should tell you and all of my fellow American citizens, as soon as I was certain in my own mind and in my own conscience that it is the right thing to do.

I have learned already in this office that the difficult decisions always come to this desk. I must admit that many of them do not look at all the same as the hypothetical questions that I have answered freely and perhaps too fast on previous occasions.

My customary policy is to try and get all the facts and to consider the opinions of my countrymen and to take counsel with my most valued friends. But these seldom agree, and in the end, the decision is mine. To procrastinate, to agonize, and to wait for a more favorable turn of events that may never come or more compelling external pressures that may as well be wrong as right, is itself a decision of sorts and a weak and potentially dangerous course for a President to follow.

I have promised to uphold the Constitution, to do what is right as God gives me to see the right, and to do the very best that I can for America.

I have asked your help and your prayers, not only when I became President but many times since. The Constitution is the supreme law of our land and it governs our actions as citizens. Only the laws of God, which govern our consciences, are superior to it.

As we are a nation under God, so I am sworn to uphold our laws with the help of God. And I have sought such guidance and searched my own conscience with special diligence to determine the right thing for me to do with respect to my predecessor in this place, Richard Nixon, and his loyal wife and family.

Theirs is an American tragedy in which we all have played a part. It could go on and on and on, or someone must write the end to it. I have concluded that only I can do that, and if I can, I must.

There are no historic or legal precedents to which I can turn in this matter, none that precisely fit the circumstances of a private citizen who has resigned the Presidency of the United States. But it is common knowledge that serious allegations and accusations hang like a sword over our former President's head, threatening his health as he tries to reshape his life, a great part of which was spent in the service of this country and by the mandate of its people.

After years of bitter controversy and divisive national debate, I have been advised, and I am compelled to conclude that many months and perhaps more years will have to pass before Richard Nixon could obtain a fair trial by jury in any jurisdiction of the United States under governing decisions of the Supreme Court.

I deeply believe in equal justice for all Americans, whatever their station or former station. The law, whether human or divine, is no respecter of persons; but the law is a respecter of reality.

The facts, as I see them, are that a former President of the United States, instead of enjoying equal treatment with any other citizen accused of violating the law, would be cruelly and excessively penalized either in preserving the presumption of his innocence or in obtaining a speedy determination of his guilt in order to repay a legal debt to society.

During this long period of delay and potential litigation, ugly passions would again be aroused. And our people would again be polarized in their opinions. And the credibility of our free institutions of government would again be challenged at home and abroad.

In the end, the courts might well hold that Richard Nixon had been denied due process, and the verdict of history would even more be inconclusive with respect to those charges arising out of the period of his Presidency, of which I am presently aware.

But it is not the ultimate fate of Richard Nixon that most concerns me, though surely it deeply troubles every decent:and every compassionate person. My concern is the immediate future of this great country.

In this, I dare not depend upon my personal sympathy as a long-time friend of the former President, nor my professional judgment as a lawyer, and I do not.

As President, my primary concern must always be the greatest good of all the people of the United States whose servant I am. As a man, my first consideration is to be true to my own convictions and my own conscience.

My conscience tells me clearly and certainly that I cannot prolong the bad dreams that continue to reopen a chapter that is closed. My conscience tells me that only I, as President, have the constitutional power to firmly shut and seal this book. My conscience tells me it is my duty, not merely to proclaim domestic tranquillity but to use every means that I have to insure it. I do believe that the buck stops here, that I cannot rely upon public opinion polls to tell me what is right. I do believe that right makes might and that if I am wrong, 10 angels swearing I was right would make no difference. I do believe, with all my heart and mind and spirit, that I, not as President but as a humble servant of God, will receive justice without mercy if I fail to show mercy.

Finally, I feel that Richard Nixon and his loved ones have suffered enough and will continue to suffer, no matter what I do, no matter what we, as a great and good nation, can do together to make his goal of peace come true.

Now, therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from July (January) 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth.


Watergate Info

And Nixon's response...

I have been informed that President Ford has granted me a full and absolute pardon for any charges which might be brought against me for actions taken during the time I was president of the United States.

In accepting this pardon, I hope that his compassionate act will contribute to lifting the burden of Watergate from our country.

Here in California, my perspective on Watergate is quite different than it was while I was embattled in the midst of the controversy, and while I was still subject to the unrelenting daily demands of the presidency itself.

Looking back on what is still in my mind a complex and confusing maze of events, decisions, pressures and personalities, one thing I can see clearly now is that I was wrong in not acting more decisively and more forthrightly in dealing with Watergate, particularly when it reached the stage of judicial proceedings and grew from a political scandal into a national tragedy.

No words can describe the depths of my regret and pain at the anguish my mistakes over Watergate have caused the nation and the presidency -- a nation I so deeply love and an institution I so greatly respect.

I know many fair-minded people believe that my motivations and action in the Watergate affair were intentionally self-serving and illegal. I now understand how my own mistakes and misjudgments have contributed to that belief and seemed to support it. This burden is the heaviest one of all to bear.

That the way I tried to deal with Watergate was the wrong way is a burden I shall bear for every day of the life that is left to me.


(same source)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon should have gone to prison
I sincerely hope that whoever wins in '08 doesn't extend a pardon to Bush and his ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. In hindsight, Ford's statement is rife with GOD's will
and guidance. I take that as cover for preordained, premeditated outcomes.

And see Ford asking God for forgiveness during the administration of Nixon's Pardon.
Moreso, Ford is hoping one fine day, the sky doesn't fall in on his head for what he is about to do,
at the behest of the Bush-Cheney gang.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ford was one of the best of his ilk ,let's not forget his ilk. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ford robbed Nixon of his right to due process --
Isn't that an impeachable offense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Crimes never investigated, criminals never punished
and the lesson learned? We are today suffering the direct consequences of that pardon, of that moment in history when those in power took the easy out, avoided the tough decisions. Will we repeat this again? Will we have another blockade on truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Daniel Shore just talked of Haig's implication in "the fix"
on NPR It was great to hear some truth after all of the BS today. Haig went to Ford and pretty much gave him a tutorial on Presidential pardons before Nixon resigned. What a coincidence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Gee I guess DS must be one of us Bad DUers
bashing the dead and refusing to go along with the Great Ford bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. what did I miss?
Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 05:09 PM by leftchick
am I bad for pointing out "the fix" like DS did?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes many of us are very bad.
Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 05:14 PM by Warren Stupidity
It seems that not going along with Great Ford is bashing the dead and is dreadful behavior and most likely we are all freeper trolls. Who knew?

See the greatest page for some hints.

Here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2983980&mesg_id=2983980
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I would LOL if I
wasn't busy :puke: ing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Well...

...I haven't bashed the dead, but I REFUSE to go along with the Great Ford Bullshit.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. So the problem is when they go to bury ceasar with praises
are we supposed to sit down and shut up about his crimes? Is that dead bashing? I would have been happy to shut up had I not had that lying war criminal al haig on the tv this am telling everyone "there was no deal" and having the usual mindless talking heads endlessly blather on about what a Great President Gerry was. Ford was an amiable oaf who cut a rotten deal to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Excellent!!
"Ford was an amiable oaf who cut a rotten deal to be president."

Well Said!

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. To me

...it's not bashing. It's speaking my opinion, Ford sucked.

Yes, there was a deal and it was wrong...it was wrong then and it's still wrong. I won't put Ford on a platform to worship, I don't know if he was a "nice guy" in everyday life and frankly I don't care.

And no I don't feel that we should have to sit down and shut up because some people here don't want to hear bad things about the dead.

As for me, I'm avoiding the news channels today....the Ford love fest is more than my stomach can handle.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Yes. Sit down and STFU for one freakin day.
Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 06:01 PM by Richardo
Be a decent human for 24 hours. I dare you.

You may resume your incessant caterwauling tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. No thanks.
I'll not take your advice, even though you presented it in such a thoughful, cogent manner. When the lies get told is the time to stand up and call bullshit, not later. Ford: amiable oaf, nice guy, lousy president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. At the time, I drew a political cartoon about this...
I was doodling one afternoon and drew caricatures of Ford and Nixon grinning and patting each other on the back. The caption read, Thanks for the presidency!...Thanks for the pardon! I wasn't too politically astute at the time, but this whole ordeal struck me as fake and contrived.

I might still have that cartoon somewhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. hey, when it went down I was only 15!
and even I knew the fix was in. I would love to see your cartoon. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I initially registered as a Republican for the 1972 election...
I was one of the first 18-year-olds to register (actually I was 19 when I voted). I registered "R" because of family tradition (my grandfather was a Kansas farmer). I switched to "I" for the general election and voted for McGovern. I was a registered "Independent" for 20 years until 1992 when I registered as a "Democrat" to vote for Paul Tsongas in the primaries. After Bill Clinton got the nomination, I stayed a "D" and voted for The Big Dog. When the Repubs took Congress in 1994 I remained in the Democrat Party as I saw the horror that awaited the nation at the hands of the neo-con fascist Repubs. This feeling was multiplied many times when Bush stole the White House in 2000...

That's my political journey...for what it's worth

It's been several years since I saw my cartoon. I believe it's in a box along with high-school yearbooks and autographed baseballs from Little League. Just where the box is, or if it even still exists, I don't know...:( Perhaps some day...some day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
California Griz Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've never forgiven Ford
for pardoning Nixon. I believe it was a defining moment in our last 60 years. It showed the rest of these creeps that if you play it right you can get away with anything. It wasn't the end of our national nightmare it was the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. There's something incredibly creepy about that...did you notice
"In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth."

What the hell is that? I've never seen that on any other official proclamation/declaration/ statement from the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I think it was because they were gearing up for the bicentennial
at the time. Yes I agree it is bizarre, almost as odd as the claims that there was no deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. the bicentennial makes sense, i suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. It's very common.
Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Is it?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061221.html

no such date structure there.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061220-7.html

no such date structure there.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061214-7.html

no such date structure there.

First three E.O. on the current white house page, last three issued by Dumbass.

Care to point us all to examples of this very common usage in executive orders?

So when Dumbass sheds his mortal coil will you be there telling us what bad sorts we are for pointing out what a criminal he was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. I refer you to these 5 randomly-selected proclamations...see last paragraph of each
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 08:30 AM by Richardo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. i've read loads of presidential statements, and i've never seen that before.
can you provide another example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. yes today's proclamation of national mourting
by the shrub
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Please see my response to WS above.
I think you'll find it in every presidential proclamation, but the WH website does not show proclamations of passt presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC