Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:17 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Edwards, Obama or Clinton? |
|
All will announce their candidacies I'm sure and all are top choices to receive the nomination(unless Gore runs -sorry to the Clark fans but I don't think he has a chance... yet).
|
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If those are the choices, I go with Edwards. n/t |
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
51. Considering the choices, I went for Obama |
|
I am in the Anybody But Clinton (ABC) camp.
|
bigluckyfeet
(559 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
General Clark. Has a chance.
|
calzone
(242 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
21. I'll skip the meal tonite, thanks |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 10:11 PM by calzone
none of the 4 choices look appetizing...now where did i put that cup-o-noodles?
|
Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
I can get behind that.
A styrofoam cup filled with foodlike polymers would certainly be a tangible improvement over the last few years..
|
PresidentObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Of those candidates. Edwards if Kerry doesn't run. If Kerry runs, probably Kerry.
|
zann725
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
19. Second that! Edwards WAS impressive today. Though curiously MSM doesn't consider Edwards a 'loser' |
|
from '04...like they do with Kerry. Yet it should be remembered, Edwards was HALF the '04 Ticket... equally responsible for that loss. But somehow MSM isn't going to "handicap" Edwards for that loss. THAT they'll reserve for Kerry alone.
JK, however, IS my first choice. But given Edwards' impressive 'sprint' from the 'gate' today, JK better SOON enter this race. Edwards made this a whole new ball game today. At the very least, from now on there'll be a little less "Hilary/Obama ONLY" dialogue.
|
DemDogs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
48. Edwards, whether Kerry enters on not. |
|
Message is right with Edwards. We can't have a better communicator. AND ELECTABLE. Sadly, Kerry doesn't have those
|
mnhtnbb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Out of the three--Edwards is top choice. Put Gore in--and he's my pick. |
SoFlaJet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
but if not Gore DEFINITELY Edwards over Obama or (I shudder to think) Hillary
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
5. B b b b but but but the MSM keeps telling us it is Clinton! |
|
How can so many be so wrong?
How about, we are tired of corporate owned MSM telling us how to think, what to buy and what bull to believe?
|
k_jerome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. you can rest assured, the DU CW pick will be out of the race first... |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. please explain to the great unwashed (like mois) what does CW stand for? |
k_jerome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. conventional wisdom. nt. |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. thanks. time for a shower. |
mloutre
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
7. sorry, you need a "none of the above" option n/t |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
8. None of those listed n/t |
Joey Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Although I like Edwards too. I think Obama would draw more support from minority voters. I hope Hillary doesn't run and stays in the Senate. She can do more good for the country and the Democratic Party in the Senate.
|
JeremyWestenn
(372 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think she's a good candidate and would make a really good President.
|
bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. one problem she's a SHE and a she at this piont willnot get elected... |
|
not in red state America.
|
MGD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
31. She has a far better chance of getting elected in red State America than John Kerry or Barack Obama. |
MGD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
29. Hillary is more qualified than Obamma and Edwards put together. |
|
I don't understand how supposedly progressive voters would support a white southern conservative Democrat like John Edwards over her. Obamma I can understand. Either way, I love her and will gladly support her.
|
SanFranciscoValues
(32 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
|
John Edwards is not a conservative democrat. Just because he was from the South, that doesn't make him a conservative. Did you even watch his speech when he declared his candidacy the other day? Universal health care? Lifting the poor out of poverty? Restoring our reputation in the world? Getting out of Iraq? How are those issues even remotely conservative? Personally, I would be happy with an Edwards/Obama ticket. I think America needs the kind of hope and optimism that such a ticket would provide. Clark would make a great Secretary of Defense : )
|
ChiciB1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
46. IMO.... This Past Year Has Shown Me A Very Right Wing Bent |
|
from Hillary! I really want her to "stay out of it" for now. There was a time when I felt she would be the best candidate, but now she is my very very last pick!
I call her DINO now. Besides, I don't like this line-up... Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush and now let's have ANOTHER Clinton! I don't think so, we MUST have more than two families in America you know!
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Between those three, I would probably choose Edwards... |
|
Tough call. But his ability to connect with his audience is undeniable.
|
Infinite Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
nickshepDEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I can't make up my mind between Edwards and Obama. |
SanFranciscoValues
(32 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hello, President McCain.
:eyes:
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Go with your heart in the primaries, go with your head in the general. |
Manifestor_of_Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Obama is too young and needs more experience.
Hillary is too right wing and voted for the Iraq war. She is too conservative.
Actually, I think Wesley Clark is FABULOUS!!!!!!
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
25. Righto with that Clark comment! |
MGD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
30. John Edwards voted yea on the Iraq War Resolution too. It's one of the few times he actually voted |
|
These are the only US Senators who voted against the IWR: Daniel Akaka (D-HI) Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) Barbara Boxer (D-CA) Robert Byrd (D-WV) Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) Jon Corzine (D-NJ) Kent Conrad (D-ND) Mark Dayton (D-MN) Dick Durbin (D-IL) Russ Feingold (D-WI) Bob Graham (D-FL) Daniel Inouye (D-HI) Jim Jeffords (I-VT) Ted Kennedy (D-MA) Patrick Leahy (D-VT) Carl Levin (D-MI) Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) Patty Murray (D-WA) Jack Reed (D-RI) Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Paul Wellstone (D-MN) Ron Wyden (D-OR)
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message |
tinfoilinfor2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
nebula
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Gore and Clark are the only decent choices.
|
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:44 AM
Response to Original message |
27. It's amazing how popularity here changes so rapidly back and forth. |
|
You would think that Edwards had announced today or something.
|
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit
(471 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |
28. I'd take Edwards out of these 3. |
hayu_lol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
Since we only have two declared candidates...shouldn't you have just put the Keebler Elf and Edwards on the poll?
CLARK
|
machka
(177 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
there's four. Vilsack and Gravel have also declared.
|
Malmo Blue
(113 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Hillary Clinton is leaning a little too much towards the right to get my vote. Sorry, Hil.
It would be awesome if Barack Obama became President, but he needs experience in American politics to become a Grade A Presidential Candidate. He would make a perfect Vice President, though. 8 years as VP under John Edwards would make excellent experience for the White House.
I guess you all know where this is going... Yes, I endorse Edwards. He has climbed up several ladders in society, political and economical, and now he wants to help the American people up these ladders. Two years ago, I was dreaming about John Edwards as Vice President of the United States. That was then... Edwards/Obama in 2008? Yes, please! :)
|
mucifer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. Obama was the only one who spoke out against the war before it started |
|
He wasn't in the US senate so he couldn't vote. But, He made his opinion known that we shouldn't invade.
|
Malmo Blue
(113 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
36. Re: Obama was the only one who spoke out against the war before it started |
|
Too be honest, I did actually support the war in Afghanistan when it started. I don't know why, guess I was scared.
The point is: Everyone makes mistakes. Edwards' mistake was supporting for the war, and he has apologized for it. Nobody's perfect, but it's certainly a lot better than Bush' "stay the course" 'strategy'.
Obama opposed the war in Iraq, that I approve of. I've always thought the invasion was a big mistake.
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
scorpion1477
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
edwards i guess...obama is still a blank page as far as I am concerned and I will never trust Senator Clinton
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
41. None of the above. choice (d) |
LWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Narrowing of choices does not force a choice from that narrow field; it leaves room for abstention, write-in, or 3rd party choice.
|
fuzzyball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
43. If Gore was included in your list, he wins hands down eom |
Beacho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But will vote for ANYONE on the ticket come the general election
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
he's the only one of the three that has a chance of winning. This country is not progressive enough to elect a black or a woman.
|
MODemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
49. My vote's for Edwards |
|
Just talked to my son-in-law in California, who was once republican leaning; but now, that Edwards is in the race and he has it all "sorted out", he's going to work for John. I like John Edwards, and his wife. John is smart, decent, charasmatic and honest. If he doesn't make it as the presidential nominee, maybe he will be the vice-president. John Edwards 2008 :thumbsup:
|
CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
50. Obama or Edwards, one of them MUST be #1 on the ticket but... |
howmad1
(959 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
52. Considering the list of losers the rethuglicans are offering...... |
|
.....it's an embarrasment of riches for the Democratic Party. Let's hope we don't screw it up by choosing someone "electable". Dream ticket? Gore/Edwards, Edwards/Clark. For sure winners.
|
JeremyWestenn
(372 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message |