MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:27 PM
Original message |
Edwards is saying Gore lost 2000 election |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:36 PM by MIMStigator
Edwards said he should be nominated since no democrat has won a presidential election without 5 southern states. Which 5 did Al Gore win?
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
mohc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. In the same sense that he lost the election |
|
Which makes this discussion pretty silly.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. I think it was one o' them there |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
_Jumper_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't think that he was counting 2000 as a win |
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
55. I'm not sure that most Americans think that Gore won either |
beyurslf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
6. No democrat has WON without 5 states. |
|
Is Gore the President right now?
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
forgethell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
Even admitting that * cheated, lied, stole, whatever - * sits in the seat of power, lives in the White House, and sends the troops wheresoever he wills, and Gore does not.
Maybe we had a "moral victory", maybe Gore legtimately belongs in the White House, and maybe Bonnie Prince Charlie was king. But WE LOST. So why are we quibbling about this?? I have never understood what we are accomplishing by this except raising our blood pressure.
the thing to do is make sure the right guy wins in 2004, not whine about past injustices, even the 2000 election. But hey, that's just me. You guys have fun.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. If Al Gore had won one, he'd be president today. |
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. If you need to hear Edwards say Bush wasn't elected, |
|
listen here: http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/03/03-12edwards-audio.htmlIf memory serves, it's in the first ten minutes of the Answer portion.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Then what is his point about democrats needing 5 southern states? |
|
It's crappy he is saying Gore lost.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
The electoral college elects the POTUS, and they chose GWB. Edwards is absolutely correct.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
As I pointed out in a previous post, the electoral college elects the POTUS, and Sen. Edwards is absolutely, 100% correct in saying no Democrat has been elected as POTUS w/o winning at least 5 Southern states.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. his 5 state comment means he thinks Gore lost Fla |
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
25. His comment means nothing of the kind. n/t |
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
30. Did you listen to the Commonwealth Club Q&A? |
HFishbine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think he meant to say five southern states or |
|
five supreme court justices.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Al Gore did NOT win in 2000. n/t |
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. your candidate Dean says he did |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:39 PM by MIMStigator
:shrug:
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Do I look like Howard Dean? |
|
He has his opinion, and I have mine.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. your opinion that Bush won Fla is wrong n/t |
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
Well, did I? Provide the relevant quote where I said that.
|
citizen snips
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Edwards did not say that. |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:46 PM by MATTMAN
He did say that the dems need 5 southern states to win does not mean Edwards said Al Gore lost.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. no he said no democrat has won without 5 southern states |
|
he didn't say a democrat needs 5 this time but won before without them
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. And Sen. Edwards is correct. |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:48 PM by Padraig18
No Democrat has ever been elected POTUS w/o winning 5 Southern states. The POTUS is elected by the electoral college----NOT by popular vote. American Government 101.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
39. That's absolutely LIBELOUS! |
|
How dare you call a Democratic presidential candidate that? :grr::nuke::wtf:
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
48. Completely out of bounds! |
spooky3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
56. Thanks, Padraig18, your attempts to help |
|
are appreciated by this Edwards supporter.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
|
I don't dislike Sen. Edwards at all, and this sort of crap is uncalled for, IMO. :hi:
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
tobius
(947 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
|
repuke enabler..."? wow... a bit quick on the trigger there cowboy.
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
28. I don't understand this thread, Gore lost in 2000 and he didn't win 5 |
|
southern states. What's the point?
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. The point is to stir shit. |
|
Isn't that pretty obvious? :shrug:
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:58 PM by Padraig18
Edwards is speaking a historical truth--- NO DEMOCRAT HAS EVER BEEN ELECTED POTUS WITHOUT WINNING 5 SOUTHERN STATES--- EVER!
|
DU GrovelBot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |
31. ## Support Democratic Underground! ## |
|
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive. Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you for your support. - An automated message from the DU GrovelBot
Click here to donate.
|
leyton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He may have won the popular vote in Florida, but it was never certified that he did, and Constitutionally speaking, he lost. And besides, if he had won five Southern states, he would be in the White House right now (and this forum wouldn't exist!). And he didn't, and so he's not.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
KFC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Gore won zero southern states in 2000. One if you give him Florida.
Well short of 5 either way.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. I don't give him florida the people of Fla did |
|
The supreme court and Edwards took it away
|
markus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
His legal strategy would not have led to a recount that would have handed him the election.
A state-wide recount would have given it to him.
Sad, but true. He lost on a technicality, but lost.
That doesn't make the behavior of the Bush Administration any less henious. I'm not crying in my tea cup. I'm banging it against the bars demanding my freedom from Bush.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. the state wide recount was what the supremes stopped |
|
it was already in the process
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
|
there was never a state-wide recount in Florida, nor was the process of doing one even begun.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
42. Just out of curiosity |
|
do most of the people posting on this thread even know that this message board was founded on the premise that the 2000 election was stolen? Do most of you even care, or is your only purpose here to score a point for your candidate no matter what he says?
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
46. WTF does that have to do with ANYTHING? |
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
47. I am shocked anybody is letting Edwards get away with |
|
agreeing with scalia theft so he can try to get nominated
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
51. E-D-W-A-R-D-S I-S C-O-R-R-E-C-T! |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 04:03 PM by Padraig18
Should I give a American Government 101 lesson here in how the POTUS is elected? I assumed that most people learned that in 8th grade.:wtf:
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
49. Did you listen to the Commonwealth Club Q&A? |
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
52. not interested in anything scalia enabler Edwards has to say now |
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
54. especially since it would disprove your premise? |
|
Is this motivated by noon exit poll results?
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
59. premise is that Edwards using scalia theft to benefit himself |
|
he wants people to think they have to nominated him because nobody has won without 5 southern states but Gore won without 5 southern states. If you say he's only saying they didn't get to be president WHAT'S HIS POINT?
he's using scalia theft to try to get nominated.
|
tobius
(947 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
DemDogs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
57. Desperation does not look good on you |
|
Clark is gone tonight, tomorrow, whenever. And if Clark supporters want to keep shooting blanks until the end, so be it. You are twisting what Edwards said. Listen to him again. He says pundits say that Democrats need to win in the South because (the pundits say) we haven't won without five Southern states.
|
Skinner
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |