Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:29 AM
Original message |
This whole "Dems have no plan for Iraq" really pisses me off ...... |
|
Why should the Democrats have a single, broadly supported plan?
The Republics don't.
There's Bush's 'plan' (which would be a joke were it not actually implementable at the say-so of a psychopath).
But what's the Republic plan? They *never* had one - unless you count weilding the Great Rubber Stamp as a plan.
What we have, instead, are series of 'plans'.
Name a politician and s/he has a plan. Some are very similar. Some are well meaning. Some are made of nothing more than pure political calculus. Some, like McCain's, are out in left field. But if you want 'plans' you have the overwhelming task of choosing one from the hundreds that are out there.
This whole damn "Dems don't have a plan" is Rovian crap being catapulted by the Three Monkey Media.
I'm sure you know this, too. What gets me even more than that the meme exists is that even now, as our people get more face time on teevee, NO ONE calls this meme for the crap that it is.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. And there is a need for a plan not fabricated in conservative land |
|
because "conservatives" fucked things up so bad in the first place. bush lied, we went to Iraq based on "conservative" values (like lying and the slaughter of thousands,) things suck in Iraq now and its imperative that someone else have a plan. The "conservative" mind never ceases to amaze.
|
theoldman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I can guarantee you that we do not know Bush's plan. |
|
It would be stupid for the Democrats show a complete plan.
|
Arkansas Granny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Bush doesn't have a plan. He just reacts in a way that he hopes |
Arkansas Granny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Bush will not acknowledge a plan that does not mirror his own |
|
thinking. If your plan agrees with his plan, then we have a plan. If it does not agree, it's not a plan.
|
mhl6277
(10 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
they say they welcomed alternative plans for success - right, just like they welcomed the baker-hamilton plan. it's flat-out double talk. anything that involves pulling out troops, or planning to pull them out, is stamped "failure," so the talking point goes. unfortunately, "failure" has already happened. another 20,000 troops is not changing that, and pretty much everyone agrees.
|
yy4me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
6. You are right, and the reason the repub's keep saying it is that |
|
they have no idea what the heck to do. If we put forth something, it would be theirs if it worked and ours if it fell flat. The war is their mess, don't blame us if you can't get yourself out of this ungodly mess. Sorry, ***8 et co, you really screwed up at the expense of the world. Find your own way out and take your own blame like big boys.
|
OregonBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Agreed. The new * plan is not a plan. It is more of the same. It is an |
|
escalation plain and simple. Dems need to point out that the pukes have screwed the pooch so badly that there really is nothing that can be done other than bringing our guys and gals home. Murtha's plan is about as good as it's going to get. Move them to the borders, move them into Kuwait and surrounding areas. Hell, move them into Afghanistan where they can do some good and will be close enough to redeploy if necessary. Anything is better than "embedding" them for house to house searches in the streets and alleyways of Baghdad.
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And why should there be? It's simple enough to realize that the Iraq venture was a mistake from start to finish, so there can be no plan for success. It isn't rocket science. The only plan is to get out of Iraq and let the Iraqis dicide for themselves what's best for their country. It's their country, not ours.
Bush & his minions are the ones who need to be held responsible for their own mistakes. This "What's the Democrats' plan?" stuff is just their way of passing off their problems onto us.
|
Iwasthere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
9. But we DO have a plan... |
|
It is called REDEPLOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...Murtha's origional plan. But yes it does piss me off too. His plan is idiotic and will do nothing but get more killed. Get outa there and let them heal their country for Gods sake!
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Here's a plan: The chimp should resign.. |
|
Turn it over to someone with half a brain.
The founders had a plan too: The person who wins the election gets to be president. That plan was rejected by the U.S. Supreme W. Court. That's our real problem.
|
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
11. There are plenty of plans, but the voters already chose *NOT* BUSH'S. |
|
There's that Iraqi study group plan, the Biden plan, the Murtha plan, the Kennedy plan, the plans of all of the Generals the White House went through like tissues, etc etc etc etc.
But in the end the American people poll and voted and know what plan they REJECT - THIS ONE.
CHRIST, why doesn't THAT penetrate into the MSM???
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |