marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:22 PM
Original message |
| Keith Olbermann just posed the question to Craig Crawford of CQ, re: Clinton and Obama, ....... |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 08:25 PM by marmar
are concerns about "lack of experience" really proxies for concerns about gender and race? He pointed out that by the time the two would run, they'd have more experience than any of the last few presidents.
Interesting question. Crawford didn't think that to extensively to be the case, and made the argument that in the states Dems need to win, it likely won't matter anyway.
|
| Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. ...and Craig's response was ? |
|
He and Keith are a great team....what a beautiful set-up. Go Keith :loveya:
|
| marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Crawford didn't think it was extensively so....and said that in the states the Dems need to win... |
|
It probably won't matter anyway.
|
| Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 8. Good safe Craig answer :) |
| BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. And, the corporate media is trying to trap one of them into saying something derogatory about the |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 08:28 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
other.
Sheesh, in the meantime Brownback and Rudy G, get minimal coverage that which they get is civil or neutral. I want to hear what each of them think about the other. MKJ
|
| lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
They've avoided the trap thus far. Good point about McCain and Giuliani, BTW.
|
| illinoisprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. when you concider that Edwards has less experience that the other two. |
|
you gotta wonder if it is. but, I personally know of quite a few dems who will not vote if hillary is the nominee so, she may not carry the states that kerry did.
Obama has 12 years when you remember he spent time in the state...
|
| Digit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. I would rather have Edwards than the other two, anyway. |
| Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Craig's blog leans Edwards.... |
|
though Crawford "tries" to stay bipartisan :evilgrin: http://www.crawfordslist.com/ |
| Dan
(595 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
| 9. I'd be willing to bet that the |
|
Democratic party will run Clinton & Obama (in that order for President & Vice president) in 2008. Watch....Bush has killed the GOP.
|
| Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. One nation, under Lockheed, with options and profits for some. n/t |
| KingofNewOrleans
(650 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
If I were a betting man, I'd bet Edwards/choose one Sebelius,Napolitano,Richardson.
|
| BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Edwards is running an interesting campaign. He is postioning himself very well. |
|
That would be a bet that I'd take, although if Gore throws in his hat, all bets are off, for me! MKJ
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed May 01st 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
