madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-26-07 01:05 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 01:06 PM by madinmaryland
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-26-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I actually thought the WSJ was subscription only. I guess not. Not that I would ever subscribe to the WSJ.
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-26-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Once you go beyond their editorial pages, the actual news reporting & news coverage by the WSJ is very good.
Of course, that's like saying that once you get beyond Vietnam, LBJ was a pretty good president... it's true, but Vietnam was such a huge issue that it's an albatross on any president's neck.
And, i was in the process of cutting & pasting the link and hitting "post message" when i saw you deleted your original request.
|
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-26-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. When I used to commute into NYC, I would grab a leftover |
|
WSJ on the train for the evening ride home. If you could get passed the bias, there was a lot of info in there that couldn't be found anywhere else.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message |