Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby: Rudy beats Hillary by 7%, loses to Obama by 6%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:26 PM
Original message
Zogby: Rudy beats Hillary by 7%, loses to Obama by 6%
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 03:26 PM by Alhena
A truly striking poll. It also shows Obama making great gains on Hillary for the nomination.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1252

Giuliani 47%, Clinton 40%
Giuliani 40%, Obama 46%
Giuliani 46%, Edwards 40%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hopefully, Hillary will just get out of the way
She, like Gore, is yesterday's news.
Obama is the new JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I knew JFK. JFK was a friend of mine. The senator from Illinois is no JFK.
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 03:36 PM by oasis
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Do you know the Senator from Illinois?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. And Obama is tomorrow's yesterday's news, and....
Come on, both will go through ups and downs over the next year and half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Gore is yesterday's news?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Gore Is Yesterday's News?
I suppose, only if you consider being part of a motion picture which won an Oscar YESTERDAY, being yesterday's news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yeah, we need presidents with Oscars
Shit, let's just elect Helen Mirren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Yes, I think she's just going to give up and go home now n/t
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. How's He Polling Against Leon Spinks?
And how is Spinks doing against Speed Racer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Zogby's great for creating new conventional wisdom.
These results are plausible to me, and I support Obama a lot more than the other two, but I know my Zogby history so I'm not getting too excited about it.

Though I think McCain's plunge in support is genuine and has been coming loud and clear since his decision to fully embrace the war, the surge, and stubbornly staying the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. re: mcCain
his plunge is real and growing. Watch for him to bow out within weeks. The local affairs in AZ politics last week pretty much took the wind out of his sails and shoved it up his pandering ass.

(he lost a local election, as did his entire group of supporters. When I find the article, I will cite it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm familiar with the case.
But at least before, he could claim to be more entrenched nationally than locally. Rudy's practically stationary honestly - it's just that McCain is sinking relative to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like Obama's the one then.
That's pretty cool. I like Obama for a number of reasons, and this is just another. (For however accurate this polling can be this early.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think the Obama smears are wearing off ....
a few weeks ago Obama was having to fend off right-wing attacks that he was a Muslim deep cover agent educated at a madrassa. Even though it was obviously BS, I think it had its effect. Now I think people are taking a fresh look at Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. I think Obama's quick retorts have something to do with it
he is quite good at fending off the attacks. I agree that it's too early, but I get this feeling his campaign is going to continue doing well. IF no one else enters the race, he's looking better and better to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other surveys have Hillary beating Giuliani. It's just too early. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. In a just world,
Every Democrat running would beat Giuliani.

I don't get the GOP appeal for this guy. Is it that think that he knows something about National Security? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They think he can beat Hillary - is the appeal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. It was a telephone survey. I posted this in the LBN thread but I'm going
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 03:50 PM by Pirate Smile
to put it here too.

My first thought was it was probably one of the e-mail surveys so it would be more tilted toward the on-line community which seems to be less favorably inclined toward Hillary but nope, it was a phone survey.


Hillary Holds On; Giuliani Expands Lead in National Primary Tests
Obama advances, but McCain fades in partisan contests; Obama, Giuliani do best in general election match-ups

New York Sen. Hillary Clinton clings to a shrinking lead over Illinois Senator Barack Obama in a national test of Democratic primary voter preference, while Republican Rudy Giuliani is expanding his edge over John McCain, the maverick senator from Arizona, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.

The survey was the first since last week’s very public spat between the Clinton and Obama campaigns over Hollywood fund–raising and the conduct of the first Clinton administration.
The telephone survey, which asked Democrats, Republicans, and non–aligned voters in which primary or caucus they planned to vote next year, was conducted Feb. 22–24, 2007, and included 1,078 likely voters (397 Republicans - MOE: +/- 5.0 percentage points, 439 Democrats - MOE: +/- 4.8 percentage points). The survey's overall margin of error was +/- 3.0 percentage points.

Among those who said they would vote in the Democratic primary or caucus for President, Clinton leads with 33% support, up 4% from our last telephone survey in early January. However, Obama has made dramatic gains in the last six weeks, moving from 14% support to 25% backing. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edward is a distant third, winning 12% support. One in five said they were undecided about which Democratic candidate to support.

-snip-
In the Democratic race, Clinton wins solid support among older voters, while Obama has the edge among younger counterparts. Clinton holds a 31% to 24% edge among white Democratic voters, while Obama leads among African–Americans, 36% to 27%. Progressives gave the nod to Obama, while moderates favored Clinton. The two were deadlocked at 30% support among male Democratic voters, but Clinton led among women, 34% to 22%.

In a measurement of how firm the support is for the candidates overall, Clinton’s support is just a bit weaker than that of Obama. A slight majority of Clinton supporters – 54% – said they are likely to change their minds before they actually cast a primary or caucus vote, while 48% of Obama supporters agreed. While his overall support lags, Edwards appears to have strong–minded backers: just 28% said they are likely to jump from the Edwards ship over the course of the next year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Too early, NNNEEEXXXXXTTTT n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's too early, but I'll take it
At the very least, it shows that Obama's had a good couple of weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Very true.
Let's see if he can keep it up though ;)

I think he might, Obama is VERY talented!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. And yet not a single one of them will be a nominee. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Nah, Hilary will be the nominee,
unless Gore comes in. I think it's already set, among the power circles to push her.

But Rudy would beat her in NY, and every other Dem except Gore. Obama will always poll high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm not sure that Rudy would beat Hillary.
New Yorkers from the city know all about him, and won't be fooled, and others in the state will learn all about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I really hope you are right.
Because if we lose NY and NJ, it is OVER. There is just no way to make up those 46 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. NY, NJ, CT, NH, PA would ALL be in play. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. I doubt Rudy would beat Hillary
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 07:36 PM by fujiyama
I think I saw polls of her winning the state. She did pretty damn well in November.

But can she win the electoral college anyways? That's doubtful. I don't see Hillary taking crucial states like PA, WI, OH, and FL...as well as NM, NV (no way in hell she would win NV against anyone).

And I agree that other bordering states may be in play. NH would be tougher. Maybe even make NJ competitive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. The problem would be that
we would be forced to spend enormous amounts of time and resources in Blue states, states that we should have in the bag. Rudy would force her or any Dem to do this, especially in NY and NJ. At the moment I am for Edwards, but more and more I am rethinking this, IF Rudy is their nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. ENOUGH SAID!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. YAHOO. Obama is my second choice after Gore.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Rudy would beat Hillary like a bad piece of meat;. He could actually
pick up northeastern states that Kerry and Gore won. Make no mistake about it, there is no love affair between Hillary and northeastern states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Rudy won't beat Hillary or anyone else because he won't get the Repuke nod
The conservative Republican base will never ever go for him, but if by some miracle he DID get the nod, ANY of our Democrats would mop up the floor with that arrogant jackoff of an over rated mayor.

BTW, it's amazing how someone on a Democratic board could express themselves like you have with such an outward showing of affection for "Rudy the Hillary Beater". Nice going!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. The numbers do not mean much at this point
The only point I wanted to make is that I hope Giuliani does not get the nomination, because I think he can be VERY dangerous. And this has nothing to do with these poll numbers. Many things will change in the year ahead, and I hope that enough will come out on Giuliani to topple him from the pedestal where many perceive him to be now, but I think that his general appeal can be significant to many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. And yet in the same poll...
Hillary still leads in the Democratic Primary among likely Democratic voters. WTF? So the Democrats WANT to nominate a loser? What will it take to get Hillary supporters to WAKE UP? Obama beats every single Republican candidate in this poll...and yet the likely Democratic voters favor Hillary. I give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's nice to see Obama doing well. I'm sure he'll match up well against any Republican
and kick their sorry asses if he gets past Hillary in our primary. Either way, Hillary or Obama, we'll likely kick the snot out of whoever they throw at us, although I think it's going to come down to Obama vs someone other than McCain or Giuliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. The dem nominee will NOT be selected on DU,
the nominee will be selected by real world democratic voters
in the primaries, which are what 10-12 months away? Way too
early for real world voters to take notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
35. Obama's one advantage over Hillary
is that he still has an opportunity to make the case with many people. Many don't know who he is and don't have many preconceived notions (unless they watch Fox - believe he went to a Madrassah, etc etc).

Hillary has already been defined. She's incredibly polarizing, even among Democrats. And her high negative numbers and people set to not vote for her, make her a difficult sell.

I wouldn't take these early polls too seriously. At this point it really shows how disinterested are in the '08 campaign.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. What about the Nader factor?
I took an online Zogby poll that asked me if I would consider voting for Nader, depending on who the nominees of each party were. They gave 6 or so different match-ups. I've been wanting to see those results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. watch this space
I consider polling this early in the game pretty meaningless (except when my guy is up - Gobama! - hee-hee).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. Obama
I hope the people wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. Is this one of those Zogby Online surveys?
Because those are completely unreliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. No, phone poll
and VIVA OBAMA!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
44. "Meaningless. Those polls are meaningless."
The only polls that are valid and authentic are those that show Senator Clinton in the lead. Because that's how real, mainstream Democrats outside of DU really feel.

:eyes:
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. Polls
All polls are showing her leading however, her lead is decreasing over time. It shows it in Zogby and Rasmussan polls. Overtime her lead will decrease as we get closer to the election. Only time will tell who will win. It is too early. Most people (those who do not follow politics) do not know who Obama is right now. On the other hand the Clinton name is a household word. Therefore, the closer we get to the election Obama and the other candidates will get to be known and the % will change. Plus Nadar is planning on getting into the race again if Clinton leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
45. I haven't decided on a candidate yet, but I'm liking Obama more all the time! n/t!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
46. Only 321 days until the Iowa caucus!
Right around the corner....

:sarcasm:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. GORE OBAMA 2008
Let's all find ways to show our support for Al Gore! :patriot:

Read Rolling Stone magazine: WHY GORE SHOULD RUN -- AND HOW HE CAN WIN
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13248532/why_gore_should_run__and_how_he_can_win

Get ready for Al Gore's next book - The Assault on Reason - out in May!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/16/AR2006091600877.html

Visit the following websites:
www.algore.com
www.algore.org
www.draftgore.com - Sign the petition! :)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
49. No surprise there!
I have been saying that Obama is much more electable than Hillary with all her baggage and her past contradictions. America is sick of political dynasties. It is bad for the county and it is un-Democratic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC