Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXCLUSIVE: E-Mails Show Rove Role in U.S. Attorney Firings (all Rove's idea)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:05 PM
Original message
EXCLUSIVE: E-Mails Show Rove Role in U.S. Attorney Firings (all Rove's idea)
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 04:06 PM by babylonsister
Link from here:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2954988&page=1

EXCLUSIVE: E-Mails Show Rove Role in U.S. Attorney Firings

Unreleased E-Mails Directly Contradict White House Assertions that the Notion Originated with Harriet Miers

March 15, 2007 — New unreleased e-mails from top administration officials show the idea of firing all 93 U.S. attorneys was raised by White House adviser Karl Rove in early January 2005, indicating Rove was more involved in the plan than previously acknowledged by the White House.

The e-mails also show Attorney General Alberto Gonzales discussed the idea of firing the attorneys en masse while he was still White House counsel — weeks before he was confirmed as attorney general.

The e-mails directly contradict White House assertions that the notion originated with recently departed White House counsel Harriet Miers and was her idea alone.

Two independent sources in a position to know have described the contents of the e-mail exchange, which could be released as early as Friday. They put Rove at the epicenter of the imbroglio and raise questions about Gonzales' explanations of the matter.

The e-mail exchange is dated in early January 2005, more than a month before the White House acknowledged it was considering firing all the U.S. attorneys — and while Gonzales still was White House counsel. On its face, the plan is not improper, inappropriate or even unusual: The President has the right to fire U.S. attorneys at any time, and presidents have done so when they took office.

What has made the issue a political firestorm is the White House's insistence that the idea came from Harriet Miers and was swiftly rejected.

White House press secretary Tony Snow told reporters Tuesday that Miers had suggesting firing all 93 and that it was "her idea only." Snow said Miers' idea was quickly rejected by the Department of Justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. It wasn't illegal for Nixon to fire Archibald Cox either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just gets interestinger and interestinger, with apologies to Lewis Carroll.
The thick plottens. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope THIS warrants a subpoena! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Schumer just said it did!
:woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I forgot about those emails" "Clinton did the same thing"
Liar Liar pants on fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ya know what is funny...
If they had fired ALL 93, they probably wouldn't be in all this hot water. It is the fact that they cherry picked who to fire, based on who and what they were investigating, that is the meat of this issue.

Unless, somehow they planned to to try and ram all 93 past congress using the Patriot act?!?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ah yes... .the old cherry-picking gambit. And every time they do it,
it winds up being the absolute pits.

As they say... pass the popcorn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC