Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No decision on Rove testifying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:23 PM
Original message
No decision on Rove testifying
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070316/pl_nm/usa_prosecutors_dc;_ylt=Ahn_0dydImklaFsjTYprplnMWM0F

No decision on Rove testifying

By Tabassum Zakaria Fri Mar 16, 6:06 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House said on Friday no decision had been made on whether to let political strategist Karl Rove testify to Congress over the firing of U.S. prosecutors that is prompting calls for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to step down.

The Justice Department has released documents and e-mails related to the firing of eight U.S. attorneys after critics questioned whether it was politically motivated.

The controversy was the latest in a string of bad news to hit the White House, including allegations of substandard health care for wounded Iraq war veterans and the conviction of a former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney in the case involving the outing of former spy Valerie Plame.

White House counsel Fred Fielding, who was negotiating with Capitol Hill on the question of White House officials testifying, advised House Judiciary Committee staff he would not have a decision by Friday as he had expected, and that talks should resume on Tuesday, a White House spokesman said.

"Given the importance of the issues under consideration and the presidential principles:spray: involved, we need more time to resolve them," spokesman Tony Fratto said.

The House and Senate judiciary committees said they could vote next week to authorize subpoenas for Rove and others.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. There will be a decision this weekend or Waxman will send out the committee subpoena
...Monday early in AM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Go back to freeperville!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. they are out in dROVES tonight
omg :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Let's send him and his ilk a boquet of turd blossoms, since Bill C's got
a hard on for rove.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemeupwhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's my take:
gonzo is thrown under the bus. Maybe this weekend. The old 'more time with his lawyers'. Oops. 'More time with his family' line. Oops. Maybe they'll go with the 'he's becoming a distraction' BS. If the scandal persists (please God), then rove 'more turd than blossom' is next.

:praypraypraypraypray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since the shrub administration loves torture, I say do the same unto Karl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. no decision had been made on
whether to let political strategist Karl Rove testify....

WTF???? Since when does the WH get to decide if someone testifies or not? Did I read that correctly?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bill C. needs to be flamed, if the moderator won't remove him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC