Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How progressive is Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:43 PM
Original message
How progressive is Obama?
I like Obama.

When I come to accept that Kucinich and Dodd are long shots, Obama is my clear second choice after Edwards.

I welcome any Obama supporters to help me feel more comfortable with Obama's progressive credentials.

One of my biggest concerns has been Obama's soft support for middle class issues as assessed by the Drum Major Institute. Specifically, the Drum Major Institute evaluated the whole Senate based on 8 key votes to support the middle class, from protecting social security to fair trade to Medicare drug protections to the minimum wage:



Obama got just a "C" for throwing the middle class under the bus on two key votes. See http://www.drummajorinstitute.com/congress/outerenvelope_senate.htm

Obama voted in favor of corporate immunity from responsibility and against consumer protections when he voted in favor of the ironically named "The Class Action Fairness Act" which overturned almost 200 years of law protecting consumers in civil rights, worker protection, product liability and consumer fraud cases.

Likewise, Obama voted to water down safety and environmental protections like the Safe Drinking Water Act when he voted in favor of Bush's Energy Policy Act of 2005.

These votes cause me some concern.

Also, Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope, devotes must criticism to the progressive wing of the Democratic party, which is the wing of the party I identify with. Here are a few quotes I was uncomfortable with:

"I also think my party can be smug, detached, and dogmatic at times. I believe in the free market, competition, and entrepreneurship, and think no small number of government programs don’t work as advertised..."

"We Democrats are just, well, confused. There are those who still champion the old-time religion, defending every New Deal and Great Society program from Republican encroachment, achieving ratings of 100 percent from the liberal interest groups ..."

"Yet our debate on education seems stuck between those who want to dismantle the public school system and those who would defend an indefensible status quo, between those who say money makes no difference in education and those who want more money without any demonstration that it will be put to good use ..."

"That Reagan’s message found such a receptive audience spoke not only to his skills as a communicator; it also spoke to the failures of liberal government… Nevertheless, by promising to side with those who worked hard, obeyed the law, cared for their families, and loved their country, Reagan offered Americans a sense of a common purpose that liberals seemed no longer able to muster ..."


Also, the Nation magazine did a critical analysis of Obama which I found very persuasive in its criticism of his record as a progressive: http://www.thenation.com/docprem.mhtml?i=20060508&s=cockburn

Finally, I get a stronger idea of Edwards’s progressive priorities from the issue pages of his website as compared to Obama's:

http://johnedwards.com/about/issues/
http://origin.barackobama.com/issues/

I like Obama. He is one of four candidates I really hope for, and if you exclude two very long-shot candidates (Kucinich and Dodd), Obama is definitely my second favorite after Edwards.

I'm all ears if any Obama supporters want to convince me that Obama should be the progressive voters' choice.

P.S. One area where Obama is arguably more progressive than Edwards is gun control. Obama has written, "I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturer’s lobby." See The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama, p.215 Oct 1, 2006. Obama would ban the sale or transfer of all semi-automatic weapons, and would increase state restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms, and would require manufacturers to provide child-safety locks with firearms. Edwards favors background checks for gun show sales, but is otherwise less oriented toward gun control. Frankly, I can live with either candidate's position on this issue, and I can see how both positions have good support among progressive voters, but I do wonder if Obama's position is a very tough sell in parts of the country, and I applaud Obama's courage in standing by that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is also my first choice-I have always liked and supported him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. My impression is that, deep down, he's moderate--which is why I support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for this info neatly put together....it underscores my own
concerns about Obama. PS...I've thrown my support to Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. he isn't by DU standards. Thank God.
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 03:53 PM by wyldwolf
But as long as the left portrays him as such, it will be easier for the media and the right to portray him that way, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. hmm.. no thanks
I was here before you, back when the original stated purpose read, "Democratic Underground welcomes Democrats of all stripes, from centrist to liberal."

I suggest if you don't like hearing from centrist, go to "blog" where the viewpoint is decidedly more to your liking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I love to hear from everyone except the dark side. I just was trying to help.
You sounded so, so, annoyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll admit I know little about Obama
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 03:55 PM by mitchtv
what I have heard puts him , ironically,near Senator Clinton, in the center, I am drifting towards Edwards, and Richardson , also. The behavior of Obama supporters doesn't encourage me to support him ( a lot of talk about 'new" politics aprinkled with a lot of venom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:55 PM
Original message
Are you kidding me?
They are measuring someones support of the Middle-Class based on a measure of 8 votes which took place in a Republican Congress? Seems like a pretty flawed 'metric' to measure ones
stance. Especially considering the crap they put into these bills.

However, as far as being a 'progressive', I'm not sure the current flock of candidates, except perhaps Kucinich meet that.

Clinton got an 'A' on that same scorecard, yet she is not a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Those quotes you post from his book seem to be somewhat incomplete and without
context. Could you post them with more background?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Here's some more context:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow. He speaks for me.
From your link:

I suspect that some readers may find my presentation of these issues to be insufficiently balanced. To this accusation, I stand guilty as charged. I am a Democrat, after all; my views on most topics correspond more closely to the editorial pages of the New York Times than those of the Wall Street Journal. I am angry about policies that consistently favor the wealthy and powerful over average Americans, and insist that government has an important role in opening up opportunity to all. I believe in evolution, scientific inquiry, and global warming; I believe in free speech, whether politically correct or politically incorrect, and I am suspicious of using government to impose anybody’s religious beliefs — including my own — on nonbelievers. Furthermore, I am a prisoner of my own biography: I can’t help but view the American experience through the lens of a black man of mixed heritage, forever mindful of how generations of people who looked like me were subjugated and stigmatized, and the subtle and not so subtle ways that race and class continue to shape our lives.

But that is not all that I am. I also think my party can be smug, detached, and dogmatic at times. I believe in the free market, competition, and entrepreneurship, and think no small number of government programs don’t work as advertised. I wish the country had fewer lawyers and more engineers. I think America has more often been a force for good than for ill in the world; I carry few illusions about our enemies, and revere the courage and competence of our military. I reject a politics that is based solely on racial identity, gender identity, sexual orientation, or victimhood generally. I think much of what ails the inner city involves a breakdown in culture that will not be cured by money alone, and that our values and spiritual life matter at least as much as our GDP.

Undoubtedly, some of these views will get me in trouble. I am new enough on the national political scene that I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views. As such, I am bound to disappoint some, if not all, of them. Which perhaps indicates a second, more intimate theme to this book — namely, how I, or anybody in public office, can avoid the pitfalls of fame, the hunger to please, the fear of loss, and thereby retain that kernel of truth, that singular voice within each of us that reminds us of our deepest commitments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think he speaks for someone who's just a little to the right of me (which is OK)
If not Edwards, Obama looks good.

But I sure wish we had a system to better accomodate a candidate like Kucinich...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kucinich, Kucinich, Kucinich
Y'know, if we could motivate the progressives to vote purely on the issues, Dennis could announce his victory right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:03 PM
Original message
Take the test:
http://www.selectsmart.com/plus/select.php?url=08frontrunners

Interesting little test. Here's what happened when I took it a while back:
(100%) 1: Sen. Barack Obama (D)
(96%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D)
(96%) 3: Sen. Russ Feingold (D)
(90%) 4: Gov. Bill Richardson (D)
(82%) 5: Sen. John Kerry (D)
(81%) 6: Ex-VP Al Gore (D)
(79%) 7: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D)
(77%) 8: Retired Gen. Wesley Clark (D)
(76%) 9: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D)
(74%) 10: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D)
(70%) 11: Sen. Joseph Biden (D)
(68%) 12: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D)
(58%) 13: Sen. Evan Bayh (D)
(47%) 14: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R)
(44%) 15: Gov. Mitt Romney (R)
(43%) 16: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R)
(35%) 17: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R)
(35%) 18: Gov. George Pataki (R)
(29%) 19: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R)
(20%) 20: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R)
(20%) 21: Sen. John McCain (R)
(15%) 22: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R)
(10%) 23: Sen. George Allen (R)
(6%) 24: Sen. Sam Brownback (R)

Oddly, according to the political views I espoused, Obama was right up there with Kucinich and Feingold, in terms of the candidate that best matched my views :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyDiaper Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. A %100 for me too.
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 04:32 PM by NastyDiaper
Hmmz :tinfoilhat:

(100%) 1: Sen. Barack Obama (D) Information
(97%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(92%) 3: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(87%) 4: Ex-VP Al Gore (D)
...

Seemed odd that the last two questions kinda let you pick your candidate, so i didn't answer. Got the (R) and (D) right. Hard to read the margins after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Oddly, 100% for me too, which isn't accurate because of gun control and a few other issues which
should have separated me from Obama. I think the scoring feature must be broken so that everyone gets a 100% Obama score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Not broken
(100%) 1: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(100%) 2: Retired Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(93%) 3: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(92%) 4: Sen. Barack Obama (D) Information
(89%) 5: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(87%) 6: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(78%) 7: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(76%) 8: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Withdrew from race.
(73%) 9: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(66%) 10: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information

I don't think the Kuch should be my number one and Dodd should be higher up, but overall it's me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Had me as 100% Obama, 87% Kucinich
Which doesn't actually make any sense to me.
I wonder if it just labels EVERYBODY as 100% Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. 100% Obama !!!!
(100%) 1: Sen. Barack Obama (D)
(87%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D)
(84%) 3: Retired Gen. Wesley Clark (D)
(77%) 4: Gov. Bill Richardson (D)
(76%) 5: Ex-VP Al Gore (D)
(71%) 6: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D)
(71%) 7: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D)
(66%) 9: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D)
(60%) 10: Sen. Joseph Biden (D)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. "I also think my party can be smug, detached, and dogmatic at times."
I think this quote is pretty accurate. Too many Democrats, particularly Progressives (and I consider myself one) are not pragmatic. They want everything their way, do not want to compromise, and if they can't get their candidate, then they will pout (read that vote for Nader) in order to teach America a lesson. The reality is that a candidate who is too far to the left cannot get elected no matter how much we might wish it to be true. I would rather have a moderate Democratic candidate who can be elected and who embraces as many progressive ideals as possible and who is open to new ideas than to insist it must be my choice of a left wing Progressive who cannot be elected. I think many here do not share that opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Out of 100 senators he ranks 14th most progressive, just above Hillary who's 15th
Obama and Hillary are well above the likes of Feingold, Kerry, and Dodd when it comes to voting progressively on all the issues.
http://www.progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?member=HI1&search=selectScore&chamber=Senate&zip=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does this help??
Posted on Mon, Mar. 19, 2007
LETTER FROM WASHINGTON

Obama more liberal than Kucinich, analysis reveals

By Steven Thomma
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON _ The most liberal member of Congress running for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination isn't Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio.

It's Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

....
Unlike TV commercials that focus on a single vote, these rankings are based on comprehensive voting records. The 2006 scores, for example, were based on as many as 95 votes on such issues as federal spending, tax cuts, the war in Iraq, embryonic stem-cell research and border security.

On the Democratic side, the analysis of "lifetime" voting records shows Obama with the most liberal ranking with a score of 84.3 after two full years in the Senate. Under the National Journal's ratings formula, that means Obama's record was more liberal than 84.3 percent of his Senate colleagues. Kucinich's lifetime record, meanwhile, was more liberal than 79.2 percent of House of Representatives members.
......

On the Democratic side, the analysis of "lifetime" voting records shows Obama as the most liberal with a score of 84.3 after two full years in the Senate. The most liberal score possible was 99. The lifetime liberal scores for the other Democrats, in their respective chambers:

- Kucinich, 79.4

- Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, 79.2

- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, 78.8

- Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, 76.8

......

Their ideological purity also varies by issue areas. Obama, for example, is more liberal on economic and foreign policy issues and slightly less liberal on social policies. Clinton and Dodd are most liberal on social policy questions, less so on economic and foreign policy votes.

Biden is most liberal on economics, much less so foreign policy....

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16935220.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Analysis of "lifetime" voting records. Wouldn't years in office
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 07:04 PM by Alamom
have some bearing? In this case, the "top" progressive would have voted on the least number of issues......


On the Democratic side, the analysis of "lifetime" voting records

- Sen. Barack Obama 84.3 - 2 years

- Rep. Dennis Kucinich, 79.4 - 10 years

- Sen. Christopher Dodd - 79.2 -16 years

- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, - 78.8 - 6 years

- Sen. Joseph Biden - 76.8 34 years



The year-to-year scores can reveal consistency or change.

The rankings differ if you look only at their 2006 scores. That year Kucinich's House record edged Obama's Senate record by one point as the most liberal, and Clinton was the least liberal, as she sought re-election and prepared to launch her presidential campaign.

Their ideological purity also varies by issue areas. Obama, for example, is more liberal on economic and foreign policy issues and slightly less liberal on social policies. Clinton and Dodd are most liberal on social policy questions, less so on economic and foreign policy votes.

Biden is most liberal on economics, much less so foreign policy. The most conservative member of Congress seeking the Republican nomination - based on lifetime voting records - is Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, with a score of 82.5. The most conservative score possible was 99.

(same link as last post)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I also had Obama at 100% on that poll
with Kucinich #2. Which I don't get, especially if this is accurate:

"Obama, for example, is more liberal on economic and foreign policy issues and slightly less liberal on social policies."

I'm very socially liberal...so how that matches, I don't get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Co-sponsoring the war as Edwards did is pretty damn anti-progressive.
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 06:57 PM by Clarkie1
He's apologized, which is great, but is shows poor judgment. I want a President with a record of sound judgment on issues of war and peace. Obama has that. So for me it's either Clark, Obama, or Richardson.

I understand people grow from their experiences, and everyone makes mistakes. But for me that's just not enough...not for the Presidency and an issue of that magnitude. I believe in holding politicians accountable for that vote. I know others disagree, but that's where I stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Really? That's where you stand?
Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wish I could help you out. I haven't looked past Kucinich and
Edwards. Too busy on oversight, impeachment, and getting torture flights out of my state stopped. It appears you have checked him out on a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. His vote on the class action bill bothers me, I'd like to get an explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That one also bothers me particularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Your out of context quotations from the book are misleading.
When read in their proper context its easy to see that he is arguing from a progressive position. Either you don't know that because you haven't read Obama's book and picked those quotes from a website, or you're intentionally cherry picking sentences out of context to paint a misleading picture. Which is it?
If I'm wrong, then please quote full paragraphs that give a more accurate picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. I could live with Obama, in the same way it would be more difficult to live with HRC
But what bothers me about the junior senator from Illinois is that he seems to have a tendency to say "my position is progressive if I SAY it's progressive, and it's not your place to question me on that. Your lucky to have me, you whiny purist losers".

And OK, he never literally comes out and says it in those words, but that does seem to be the sense of a lot of what he says.

I do feel he's obligated to not move any FURTHER to the right. Can we all agree on that?

Can we all agree that it would be pointless to elect Obama(or any OTHER Dem)on Clinton's '92 or '96 platforms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. For a fuller picture on Obama's progressive record, check this out...
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 09:07 PM by zulchzulu
Abortion Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 2006.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2005.

2003  On the votes that the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2002  Based on information available in 2002, the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council chose to endorse Senator Obama.

2002  On the votes that the Illinois Federation for Right to Life considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 50 percent of the time.

2001  On the votes that the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1997-2000  On the votes that the Illinois Federation for Right to Life considered to be the most important in 1997-2000, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.

1997-1998  On the votes that the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council considered to be the most important in 1997-1998, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

Agriculture Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Association of Wheat Growers 67 percent in 2005.

Animal Rights and Wildlife Issues
2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the The Humane Society of the United States 60 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the The Humane Society of the United States 20 percent in 2005.

In 2004 Humane USA PAC endorsed Senator Obama.

Arts and Humanities
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Trust for Historic Preservation 100 percent in 2005.

Budget, Spending and Taxes
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Taxpayers Union 6 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the FreedomWorks 6 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Americans for Tax Reform 0 percent in 2005.

2001-2002  On the votes that the National Taxpayers United of Illinois considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 10 percent of the time.

1999  On the votes that the National Taxpayers United of Illinois considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.

Business and Consumers
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association 92 percent in 2006.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Federation of Independent Business 12 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Association of Government Contractors 0 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce 39 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Business-Industry Political Action Committee 15 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the International Sleep Products Association 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council 9 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Federation of Independent Business 17 percent in 2005.

In 2004 National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC endorsed Senator Obama.

On the votes that the Illinois Prosperity Project considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 12 percent of the time.

On the votes that the Illinois Chamber of Commerce considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 39 percent of the time.

2001-2002  On the votes that the Illinois Prosperity Project considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 67 percent of the time.

2001-2002  On the votes that the Illinois National Federation of Independent Business considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 29 percent of the time.

1999-Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association 100 percent in 1999-2006.

1999-2000  On the votes that the Illinois National Federation of Independent Business considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 40 percent of the time.

Civil Liberties
2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 83 percent in 2005-2006.

Civil Rights
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 94 percent in 2005.

Education
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Education Association 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Association for College Admission Counseling 100 percent in 2005.

Energy Issues
2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the Campaign for America's Future 100 percent in 2005-2006 on energy legislation.

Environmental Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Land Rights Association 11 percent in 2006.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the Comprehensive US Sustainable Population 69 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Wilderness Coalition 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund 88 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 95 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Land Rights Association 17 percent in 2005.

2003  On the votes that the Illinois Environmental Council considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1998  On the votes that the Illinois Environmental Council considered to be the most important in 1998, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 75 percent of the time.

1998  Based on information available in 1998, the Illinois Sierra Club chose to endorse Senator Obama.

Family and Children Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Children's Defense Fund 100 percent in 2005.

Foreign Aid and Policy Issues
In 2006 Citizens for Global Solutions gave Senator Obama a rating of A+.

In 2006, The Genocide Intervention Network--Darfur Scores assigned Senator Obama a grade of A+ based on voting records, bill sponsorship and other activities related to ending the genocide in Darfur.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the Friends Committee on National Legislation 92 percent in 2005-2006.

In 2005 Citizens for Global Solutions gave Senator Obama a rating of A-.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Peace Action 89 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Latin America Working Group 50 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the PeacePAC 100 percent in 2005.

Gender Issues
2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Association of University Women 90 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Association of University Women 83 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Organization for Women 100 percent in 2005.

2002  Based on information available in 2002, Illinois National Organization for Women chose to endorse Senator Obama.

Government Reform
Senator Obama supported the interests of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group 86 percent in 2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Citizens Against Government Waste 13 percent in 2005.

Gun Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Gun Owners of America 0 percent in 2005.

2004  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2004, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Obama a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2002  Based on voting records and a questionnaire sent out to all state legislative candidates by Illinois Citizens for Handgun Control, Senator Obama was assigned a grade of A (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2002  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2002, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Obama a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

Health Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Public Health Association 80 percent in 2005.

Immigration
Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Immigration Lawyers Association 88 percent in 2006.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the U.S. Border Control 8 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Federation for American Immigration Reform 0 percent in 2005.

2003-Senator Obama supported the interests of the Americans for Better Immigration 14 percent in 2003-2006.

Labor
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 94 percent in 2006.

2005-Senator Obama supported the interests of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 100 percent in 2005-2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 92 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 93 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 92 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 100 percent in 2005.

2003  Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois AFL-CIO 89 percent in 2003.

2001  On the votes that the Illinois AFL-CIO considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 89 percent of the time.

1999  On the votes that the Illinois AFL-CIO considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.

Liberal
Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Committee for an Effective Congress 95 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 100 percent in 2005.

National Journal
According to the National Journal - Composite Liberal Score's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more liberal on economic, defense and foreign policy issues than 83 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more liberal on social policy issues than 77 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Composite Conservative Score's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more conservative on economic, defense and foreign policy issues than 18 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more liberal on foreign policy issues than 76 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy calculations, in 2005 Senator Obama voted more conservative on economic policy issues than 12 percent of Senators.

According to the National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more conservative on foreign policy issues than 15 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more liberal on economic policy issues than 87 percent of the Senators.

According to the National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Obama voted more conservative on social policy issues than 18 percent of the Senators.

Senior and Social Security Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Alliance for Retired Americans 100 percent in 2005.

Social Issues
Senator Obama supported the interests of the Secular Coalition for America 90 percent in 2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Population Connection 100 percent in 2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Population Institute 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Mennonite Central Committee 90 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Population Connection 100 percent in 2005.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy 75 percent in 2005.

2003  Senator Obama supported the interests of the Citizen Action Illinois 96 percent in 2003.

2002  Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Family Institute 50 percent in 2002.

2001  In 2001 Citizen Action Illinois gave Senator Obama a rating of Excellent.

1998  Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Family Institute 80 percent in 1998.

1997-1998  On the votes that the National Association of Social Workers - Illinois Chapter considered to be the most important in 1997-1998, Senator Obama voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

Trade Issues
2005-In 2005-2006 USA Engage gave Senator Obama a rating of C.

Veterans Issues
In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator Obama a grade of B+.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 80 percent in 2006.

Senator Obama supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 92 percent in 2005.


http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS030017
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larsj Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. I will vote for him
or any candidate that stops pretending that Iran is a threat.

They are enabling Bush in his lies and it needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC