Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about troop funding bill: How long is the funding for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:41 AM
Original message
Question about troop funding bill: How long is the funding for?
Is it for a year? If so, the Dems should sent bush a bill that funds only until September, when Patreus says we will be seeing great improvements in the situation in Iraq. I do not believe there will be improvements, and if there are not, then all funding should be cut off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe this supplemental funding lasts until September 1st. Bush asked for $95 billion
for Iraq and Afghanistan--that's $11.875 BILLION a month--for the mess we have in Iraq and Afghanistan is teetering on the brink of being a failed state, as well.

Your tax dollars at work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. The democratic congress controls the purse strings, that is their
...power and they must not forfeit that power to Bush/Cheney and the neocon thugs running the war. So I agree with you on keeping a tight oversight on the progress of the war according to monthly benchmarks and 90 day reviews. July and August will be critical as the Iraqi Parliament will adjourn over the summer and may not reassemble in September as expected IMHO.

<snip>
New York Times
April 28, 2007

The White House Scales Back Talk of Iraq Progress
By DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON, April 27 — The Bush administration will not try to assess whether the troop increase in Iraq is producing signs of political progress or greater security until September, and many of Mr. Bush’s top advisers now anticipate that any gains by then will be limited, according to senior administration officials.

In interviews over the past week, the officials made clear that the White House is gradually scaling back its expectations for the government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki. The timelines they are now discussing suggest that the White House may maintain the increased numbers of American troops in Iraq well into next year.

That prospect would entail a dramatically longer commitment of frontline troops, patrolling the most dangerous neighborhoods of Baghdad, than the one envisioned in legislation that passed the House and Senate this week. That vote, largely symbolic because Democrats do not have the votes to override the promised presidential veto, set deadlines that would lead to the withdrawal of combat troops by the end of March 2008.

On Friday, during an appearance with Japan’s prime minister at Camp David, President Bush said that he would invite congressional leaders to the White House on Wednesday, immediately after his expected veto message, to talk about a “way forward.”
<MORE>

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/28/washington/28prexy.html?ex=1335412800&en=c70bf93efca9340b&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC