Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-01-07 01:12 PM
Original message |
Note there's no Wolfowitz defense of job performance... |
|
no one's claiming investment in the third world is improving under his guidance no one's claiming poverty in the third world is decreasing no one's claiming self-sufficiency in the third world is improving no one's claiming life expectancy in the third world is better no one's claiming infant mortality is down
His entire defense is 'I'm your run of the mill criminal'.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-01-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. His defense is that he's the man Bush wants on the job |
|
and it's a pretty good one, because Bush's vote is the only one that matters here, the way the World Bank is structured.
|
Igel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-01-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I haven't seen him attacked on that, however. |
|
I'd point out there's also no defense of his diet or blood cholesterol levels, nor is he defending his dental hygiene.
It's down to charges that the promotion and pay raise given to his girl were excessive, and the committee didn't know a thing about them.
But then there's the allegation that e-mails concerning precisely those points were circulated to the ethics committee and WB board members *prior* to the ethics committee's saying, in effect, that everything was fine and nothing more need be said on the matter.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |