Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeLay's PAC closes shop after decade-long run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 01:54 PM
Original message
DeLay's PAC closes shop after decade-long run
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/05/delays_pac_closes_shop.html

By Paul Kane

The political action committee for former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was quietly closed last week after a decade-long run as one of the most influential - and infamous - PACs run by members of Congress.

With a final $1,400 payment to the Federal Election Commission last month settling an audit dispute, Americans for a Republican Majority then filed its termination papers with the commission April 24.

Thus ends one more chapter in the storied political rise and fall of DeLay.

Unlike congressional re-election committees - used solely for campaign efforts back in members' districts - so-called leadership PACs are designed almost purely for lawmakers to gain influence inside the Capitol. These PACs take in cash in larger chunks ($5,000 per year) and are used to make contributions (up to $10,000 per election cycle) to other lawmakers.

And, in an 11-year run among GOP leadership ranks, no one in Congress used political money to maximize his own influence more than DeLay. From 2001 through 2005, as DeLay's power reached its apex, his PAC dished out more than $2.6 million in donations to other House and Senate candidates as well as national political party committees.

more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh huh. Why isn't DeLay in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He hasn't had his trial yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Shame he can't await his trial from a cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Uh, right
I guess waiting until people are actually convicted before locking them in prison is pre-9/11 thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I said it was a shame, not that we should change our legal process.
The fact is that not everyone makes bail and some suspects do get stuck in prison waiting for trial (particularly those considered a flight risk).

In any case, I'm not asking for the removal of due process, it's just a shame that fucker is still free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rev. Mother Ramallo Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought he was in jail...
Good Lord, how long does a trial take?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand this -
many gangsters continue to run their organizations from prison. What a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC