Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Clinton's Statement on Bush Veto of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 06:30 PM
Original message
Senator Clinton's Statement on Bush Veto of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill
May 1, 2007

"Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the President's Veto of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill"


Washington, DC - "With his veto today, President Bush has made it clear that he is standing in the way of ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home. The nation is ready for the President to stop disregarding the will of the American people and to work with Democrats on a funding bill that will enable us to begin redeploying our troops. He has a chance to do just that when he meets with the Democratic leadership tomorrow.

It has been four years since the President declared an end to major combat operations. It is my hope that the President will approach this next round of talks in good faith.

I am also disappointed that with his veto, the President has taken us back a step in meeting the homeland security needs of our high-threat cities like New York City and vetoed $35 million in additional funding under the Urban Area Security Initiative.

In addition, with his veto, the President has shirked his responsibility to address the growing health needs affecting those exposed to the toxic air around Ground Zero in the wake of 9/11 and vetoed $50 million in funding for 9/11 health, which would not only have helped provide treatment to those affected in the New York metro area, but also to responders from all over the country who are suffering from 9/11 health effects. This funding would have helped meet immediate health needs and allow 9/11 health programs to continue operating. Despite the President's actions today, I will continue to fight, along with my colleagues in the New York delegation, to secure the federal commitment and funding required to meet 9/11 health needs in the long-term.

The President has also chosen to veto critical legislation that would have ended the practice of giving Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contractors bonuses for incomplete or sub-par work, thereby saving taxpayers millions of dollars."

http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=273445&&

...thanks, Senator Clinton, for making note of the other programs cut by Bush's VETO Pen...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, would complete incompetence and recklessness be grounds enough
for the removal of the occupiers of the Executive Branch? This done as the present administration having proven themselves a danger and threat to the Security and Safety of the USA and it's citizenry...This done without going the Impeachment route?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Should be.........eom
Edited on Tue May-01-07 07:16 PM by Alamom
edsp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC