Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bill Richardson really Support the Sandinistas?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:00 AM
Original message
Did Bill Richardson really Support the Sandinistas?
I heard this repeated on Tucker or Hardball (one of those shows) and was wondering if it were true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. As long as it doesn't count that St. Ronnie
supported the contras...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Google is your friend.....
Edited on Fri May-11-07 12:46 AM by FrenchieCat
But if you heard it on the corporate media, If I were you.....I'd be highly doubtful, period. No matter if it appears to be a good thing or a not so good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would it Bother You if He Supported the Sandanistas?
It would make me think more highly of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hold on....
False alarm. I was getting the Sandinista's mixed up with the Contra's...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well damn,I hope so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. A better question would be: Why is that a bad thing?
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2078191664963171759&q=John+Pilger

Watch John Pilger's 1983 documentary "Nicaragua: A Nation's Right To Survive" and you'd be hard-pressed to think of an answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. False alarm...see two posts above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. As a Latin American
I have no respect for the Latin American left... at all, and I 'll leave it there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nothing in Googles that I could find regarding Richardson and the Sandinistas
Edited on Fri May-11-07 12:19 AM by FrenchieCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. I thought they were talking about Dodd
Edited on Fri May-11-07 12:23 AM by OHdem10
anyway, it should not matter whether he supported Sadinistas
or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. These days, if it is just said that a candidate is supporting a "group" with a
Foreign sounding name, it's a hit.

That's how simple the game is to play!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. I did...
and would hope he did also.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Here's some stuff
The spectacularly imprudent visit of President Daniel Ortega to Moscow is credited with changing marginal congressional minds. They must have been very marginal minds indeed to have been surprised that a Marxist-Leninist would pay a visit to his handlers.

Senator Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) made the point. "Where did many of my colleagues think he was going to go? Disney World?" Dodd, of course, does not mind Communoid regimes springing up south of the Rio Grande like toadstools, and he stayed in the pro-Sandinista camp. He was almost equaled in awfulness by one of the switchers, Representative William B. Richardson (D., N.M.). "I've been willing to give Daniel Ortega the benefit of the doubt, and that's produced nothing. So I'm willing to give the President a try." Glad to hear it, Bill. Meanwhile, back in Managua, Ortega's brother, the defense minister (wasn't nepotism one of the Somozas' sins?), puffed himself up like a big bullfrog and warned that if ever the United States intervened directly, "popular forces throughout Latin America will unleash their violence." Eeek!


Bold mine...because the word "Communoid" just makes me laugh.Actually the whole paragraph is hilarious.I love Freeper mentality in full meltdown mode.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_v37/ai_3853972

but the there's this,from a source only slightly less biased;

During the mid-1980s, Richardson was a leading opponent of aid to the contra rebels until he visited Nicaragua in 1985 and concluded that humanitarian assistance was needed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/keyplayers/rich121496.htm

But this stuff seems to be the where you really want to look;

H.RES.139
Title: A resolution condemning the violations of human rights committed by the Government of Nicaragua and by the Nicaraguan insurgent forces, including the so-called "Contras".

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d099:4:./temp/~bdCLpc::

42. H.AMDT.279 to H.R.1555 An amendment prohibiting the diversion of assistance for Nicaragua for acquisition of weapons or other materials that could be used to inflict serious bodily harm or death. The amendment also states the concerns of the U.S. about Nicaraguan foreign and domestic policies.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d099:42:./temp/~bdTjXp::


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC