Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters: Howie Kurtz quotes conservative bloggers on Sebelius...without facts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:55 PM
Original message
Media Matters: Howie Kurtz quotes conservative bloggers on Sebelius...without facts.
Well, isn't that what Howie K. often does? This is inexcusable. Governor Sebelius is being made a target of the right wing bloggers.

Where are the left wing bloggers when a Democratic governor is being attacked?

Kurtz reprinted right-wing attacks on Sebelius, omitted evidence in her favor

Summary: In his "Media Notes" column, Howard Kurtz uncritically reprinted responses by conservative bloggers to Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' (D) assertion that the Kansas National Guard was not able to respond quickly to the Greensburg tornado because much of its equipment is deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Kurtz did not cite statistics reported in a New York Times article that support Sebelius' claim -- an article he had previously mentioned -- much less try to sort out the merits of the competing claims.

...."In his May 10 Washington Post "Media Notes" column, Howard Kurtz uncritically reprinted responses by conservative bloggers to Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' (D) assertion, reported in a May 9 New York Times article, that the state was not able to respond quickly to a tornado that leveled the town of Greensburg because much of the Kansas National Guard's equipment had been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Kurtz said the Times article "gave heavy weight to the argument of Democratic governors," and then quoted conservative bloggers asserting that the facts refuted Sebelius' claims. However, the Times article itself included statistics that back up Sebelius' position -- but Kurtz did not report those in his column, much less try to sort out the merits of the competing claims.


Howie, it is called lazy journalism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Goddammit.
This was something that started on that bastion of raving lunacy, FweePeeVille. Has Howie sunk this low? Is that what he is now using for source material?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sebelius is their target.
They are not going to let up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is worst than that
Howard Dean's lawyers have sent a cease and decease letter to the originators of the post. Since Kurtz re-printed it without verification I think they should do the same to him and make him print a retraction or they will sue him and the Post also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kinda makes me sick to hear people call him "Howie"

It's just WAY too chummy for a lowlife like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Especially since Brownback has said it's not true. Bad Reporter, Bad! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Howie, it is called lazy journalism
No it is called Propaganda....There was no journalism involved at all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "No it is called Propaganda"...
...right you are, and the sooner we all realize it and call it by its true name, the better. While Americans continue to congratulate themselves on their "free press", and point to the many articles critical of the rich and powerful to prove that it is so, the facts say otherwise. The facts say that agendas are pushed through the media, and that in some cases our government has paid so-called "journalists" specifically to promote some position or other, and since this is technically the definition of propaganda, and since propaganda as such is actually illegal in the USA -- then why, oh why, in this land where the "rule of law" reigns supreme, have we not seen a single charge brought against the propagandists? Then of course there is the unpaid-for propaganda, which is even more pervasive, and that we here all rail against: the slanted coverage, the shared narrative based on Republican talking points sprayed out in fax blasts to news organizations around the country and used uncritically -- adoringly, even -- to promote outright falsehoods.

Sorry, pet peeve, propaganda. Either there's a lot more of it right now than when I was younger, or I'm just better at spotting it these days. Probably both.

We need as a people to get to the point where we recognize our Pravda-ized media for what it has become.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, you are right.
And I noticed that the radio show and Free Republic...have not taken their stuff down at all. Not even after Brownback's campaign spoke out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC