Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Richardson: One Handshake At A Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:22 PM
Original message
Bill Richardson: One Handshake At A Time
CBS News' Jeff Greenfield Follows Presidential Hopeful Bill Richardson In His Search For Votes



"I want you to send a message: You're not gonna be swayed by Washington insiders. I'm not a rock star. I don't have a lot of money." --Bill Richardson

{snip}

Last Friday evening, Richardson crossed the Missouri River to speak to the national convention of the Young Democrats of America at the Omaha Marriott. A 17-piece band from Omaha North High School was belting out 12-bar blues . . .

He offered to the Young Democrats his core stump speech, which, as most every candidate does, he would repeat at stop after stop. ("I can recite it in my sleep," one of his aides later boasted, or confessed.) It's an account of what he would do in his first six days in office: Pull all the troops out of Iraq, organize an "all-Muslim peacekeeping force," move toward universal health care, launch a campaign for energy independence, make college more accessible, and reaffirm American values. (Realizing this may sound a bit ambitious, he jokes that he might want to take Day 4 off.) And toward the end, Richardson hit a theme that is likely to be one of his key messages to Democrats: I can win.

"I'm a governor," he says. "We elect governors." He's from the interior West, where Democrats need to stop conceding the 41 electoral votes of those eight states. And he's a centrist: pro-gun rights, pro-economic growth, anti-"redistributionist." One reason Gore lost in 2000, he says to me, is that he ran on populism and not the economic record of the Clinton-Gore administration.

The next day, Richardson takes his message to a series of small towns. It is here that the message merges with the strategy. In Red Oak, he spends an hour talking and answering questions with some 40 people gathered in Kate and Lainie's coffee house off the main square . . .

. . . as he says later on a lawn in Carter Lake, "I'm going to be here for the next eight months — I'm not going to give a speech and leave." It is a strategy right out of the playbook of Jimmy Carter, who made the Iowa caucuses his launching pad in 1976. Shake every hand; hit every town, large and small, and shock the political establishment with a surprise showing . . .

It's possible to question this strategy. For one thing, given the astonishingly early launch of this campaign — and the coverage — it's almost unimaginable that any candidate can "surprise" the establishment. Front-runner and long shot alike know the power of Iowa, and have for the last few decades. For another, with the big states weighing in a week or two after the caucuses, it's no longer possible to do well in Iowa, then raise the money over a month or so. Florida, New York, California, Illinois and Co. lurk right around the corner, and big money will be needed long before the small contingent of Iowa caucus-goers venture from their homes on a freezing January night.

But for Richardson, whose love of politics and campaigning is visceral and lifelong, it is the only strategy that makes sense. So he is up at dawn, stuffed into the front seat of a van or in the coach seat of a commercial jet, looking to shake every hand in the land.

Don't sell him short. Bill Richardson claims to hold the record for shaking more hands in a single day, more than 13,000 of them, than any other human being.

Only 299,987,000 to go.


article: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/21/notebook/main2833080.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's a good guy.. I think Richardson and Clark should team up..


~

A popular Southwestern Governor and a 4-Star General.. What more can you ask for?!?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I really like this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a shame more people haven't heard of him.
I've finally stopped "shopping," and decided to throw in my lot with BR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think they'll hear about him soon.
Once everyone gets tired of the media-anointed "big three", there's BR with that impressive resume. He makes the other candidates look green and inexperienced.

BR is the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. looks like someone at the top is looking to put him in the news
Jeff Greenfield isn't just spending his expensive time reviewing someone they think is a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Richardson should be Obama's VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or vice-versa?


~ and ~



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What is Clark doing these days?
He's not throwing his hat into the ring, is he? From reading DU, he sure seem to have quite a following, maybe enough to make him a good VP choice.

As for Obama/Richardson ~ how strange it would be to put the man with all the experience in the second seat and the rock star in the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think he's throwing his hat in the ring... but I think he's going to be a PRIME VP choice

For whoever our ultimate nominee is ~~~~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Richardson-Obama works too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. That would be an attractive ticket!
And potentially stir me from the 2008 presidential "I don't want any of them" doldrums.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. I liked most of Richardson's comments..
Edited on Thu May-24-07 12:27 AM by flaminbats
especially his comments in favor of pulling all the troops out of Iraq within six days and passing universal healthcare. but I didn't agree with his analysis of the 2000 election.

And he's a centrist: pro-gun rights, pro-economic growth, anti-"redistributionist." One reason Gore lost in 2000, he says to me, is that he ran on populism and not the economic record of the Clinton-Gore administration.

I don't think Gore lost in 2000 because he ran on populism, he lost because he thought that running on Clinton's economic record would be adequate. Kerry understood this mistake in 2004, but if Kerry had run only on the economic record of the Clinton adminstration..Bush would have been re-elected by a landslide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Gore and Clinton both say RKBA was a critical factor in Gore's loss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. this is probably true..
I remember more of my Republican friends supported the Brady Bill and assault weapons band than the Democrats I knew. many of those Democrats quickly became Republicans and big fans of Newt Gingrich. but none of the Republicans, who once told me those measures would curtail crime, even considered voting for Bill Clinton! They voted for Bob Dole in 1996 and still blindly support Bush today.

backing those gun support measures didn't win over any Republicans, who claimed to be concerned about crime and terrorism. but it scared away allot of independents and working class Democrats who backed Perot in the 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC